Identification and verification of location errors of rotary axes on five-axis machine tools by using a touch-trigger probe and a sphere
- 30 Downloads
As a foundation to enhance the machining accuracy of five-axis machine tools, a robust, efficient, and precise method to measure the location errors of rotary axes on five-axis machine tools has been proposed in this study. This precise identification and calibration methodology for on-machine measurement of location errors of rotary axes is achieved by using a touch-trigger probe and a precise sphere installed on a tilting rotary table. Compared to commercially available devices, such as the double ball bar and R-test, the proposed measurement method has the advantages of efficient and automated calibration procedures in each periodical measurement. This proposed calibration algorithm builds a kinematic error model and measurement equations by using a forward and inverse kinematic approach and estimates the location errors by applying the least squares method. Moreover, the proposed calibration algorithm defines the location errors of the two rotary axes so they can be estimated and separated individually to avoid coupling effects. All the location errors of the rotary axes measured using the proposed measurement method were identified after compensation to improve the accuracy of the five-axis machine tool. A simulation was implemented to inspect the influence of uncertainties on the identified location errors of the rotary axes. Finally, an experimental demonstration on a five-axis machine tool with a tilting rotary table validates the feasibility of the proposed measurement method.
KeywordsLocation errors Rotary axis Five-axis machine tool Touch-trigger probe Error identification
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support provided to this study by the Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan under Grant Nos. MOST 106-2218-E-194-011, 106-3114-8-194-001, and 107-2218-E-194-002.
- 6.Li B, Zhang H, Ye P (2018) Error constraint optimization for corner smoothing algorithms in high-speed CNC machine tools. In: Int J Adv Manuf Technol, vol 99, pp 635–646Google Scholar
- 10.Sun G, He G, Zhang D, Sang Y, Zhang X, Ding B (2018) Effects of geometrical errors of guideways on the repeatability of positioning of linear axes of machine tools. In: Int J Adv Manuf Technol, vol 98, pp 2319–2333Google Scholar
- 13.ISO 230-7: 2006 (2006) Test code for machine tools-part 7: geometric accuracy of axes of rotationGoogle Scholar
- 14.Gąska P, Gąska A, Gruza M (2017) Challenges for modeling of five-axis coordinate measuring systems. Appl Sci Basel 7(8):803Google Scholar
- 20.Liu H, Xiang H, Chen J, Yang R (2018) Measurement and compensation of machine tool geometry error based on Abbe principle, Int J Adv Manuf Technol. published onlineGoogle Scholar
- 27.ISO 230-10: 2011 (2011) Test code for machine tools–part 10: determination of measuring performance of probing systems of numerically controlled machine toolsGoogle Scholar
- 28.Tongtai website, http://www.tongtai.com.tw/tw/product-detail.php?id=37
- 29.Inasaki I, Kishinami K, Sakamoto S (1997) Shaper generation theory of machine tools—its basis and applications. Yokendo, 95–103. (in Japanese)Google Scholar
- 30.Siemens AG (2008) SINUMERIK 840D sl/840D/840Di sl cycles programming manualGoogle Scholar
- 31.JCGM/WG 1 (2008) Evaluation of measurement data—guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement. JCGMGoogle Scholar