Optimum curved die profile for tube drawing process with fixed conical plug

  • Nima Dabiri Farahani
  • Ali Parvizi
  • Ali Barooni
  • Sina Anvari Naeini
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • 9 Downloads

Abstract

Wide applications of tube drawing process with using a fixed conical plug in manufacturing of thin-walled tubes have convinced the researchers to investigate and optimize this process in the past years. Current study deals with presenting an optimum curved die profile utilized in tube drawing process with fixed conical plug. Minimizing the required tensile stress in the process as well as reducing the stress which is applied to the die and plug has been considered as objectives of this study. Considering work-hardening behavior of material, the drawing stress of the process is analyzed based on incremental slab method theory. In addition to, plain strain condition is applied through the thin-walled tube. Furthermore, the obtained optimum die profile has also been simulated using ANSYS Workbench 18.0 and the results were compared with those of analytical method. It is found that the die profile could be determined based on the mechanical properties of the workpiece, reduction of cross section area, plug angle, and coefficients of friction. Results demonstrate that by applying an optimum die profile, the required tension stress in tube drawing process could considerably be reduced comparing to the same process with conical die profile.

Keywords

Tube drawing Curved die profile Slab method Optimization FEM 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful for the research support of the Iran National Science Foundation (INSF).

References

  1. 1.
    Avitzur B (1968) Metal forming processes and analysis. McGraw-Hill Education, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Parvizi A, Abrinia K, Salimi M (2011) Slab analysis of ring rolling assuming constant shear friction. J Mater Eng Perform 20:1505–1511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Parvizi A, Pasoodeh B, Abrinia K (2015) An analytical approach to asymmetrical wire rolling process with finite element verification. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 85(1–4):381–389Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wang HY, Li X, Sun J, Zhang DH (2015) Analysis of sandwich rolling with two different thicknesses outer layers based on slab method. Int J Mech Sci 106:194–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Afrouz F, Parvizi A (2015) An analytical model of asymmetric rolling of unbounded clad sheets with shear effects. J Manuf Process 20:162–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Parvizi A, Afrouz F (2016) Slab analysis of asymmetrical clad sheet bounded before rolling process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 87:137–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Afrasiab H (2016) Numerical and analytical approaches for improving die design in the radial forging process of tubes without a mandrel. Sci Iran 23(1):167–173Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Parvizi A, Rezapour O, Safari MA (2016) Theoretical modeling, simulation and experimental studies of al/cu clad sheet forging. Int J Interact Des Manuf 11(3):525–533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Swiatkowski K, Hatalak R (2004) Study of the new floating-plug drawing process of thin-walled tubes. J Mater Process Technol 151(1):105–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Palengat M, Changon G, Favier D, Louche H, Linardon C, Plaideau C (2013) Cold drawing of 3161 stainless steel thin-walled tubes: Experiment and finite element analysis. Int J Mech Sci 70:69–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rubio EM, Gonzalez C, Marcos M, Sebastian MA (2006) Energetic analysis of tube drawing processes with fixed plug by upper bound method. J Mater Process Technol 177(1):175–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rubio EM (2006) Analytical methods application to the study of tube drawing processes with fixed conical inner plug: Slab and upper bound methods. J Achieve Mater Manuf Eng 14(1–2):119–130Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Orhan S (2016) Effects of the semi die/plug angles on cold tube drawing with a fixed plug by FEM for AISI 1010 steel tube. 2015 4th Int Symp on Inno Technol in Eng and Sci, pp. 1065–1074Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wifi AS, Shalta MN, Abdel-Hamid A (1998) An optimum curved die profile for the hot forward rod extrusion process. J Mater Process Technol 73:97–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Noorani-Azad M, Bakhshi-Jooybari M, Hosseinipour SJ, Gorji A (2005) Experimental and numerical study of optimal die profile in cold forward rod extrusion of aluminum. J Mater Process Technol 164-165:1572–1577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lee SK, Jeong MS, Kim BM, Lee SB (2013) Die shape design of tube drawing process using FE analysis and optimization method. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 66(1–4):381–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Salehi M, Hosseinzadeh M, Elyasi M (2016) A study on optimal Design of Process Parameters in tube drawing process of rectangular parts by combining box–Behnken Design of Experiment, response surface methodology and artificial bee Colony algorithm. Trans Indian Inst Metals 69(6):1223–1235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sheu JJ, Lin SY, Yu CH (2014) Optimum die Design for Single Pass Steel Tube Drawing with large strain deformation. Procedia Eng 81:688–693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hosford WF, Caddell RM (2007) Metal forming: Mechanics and metallurgy. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Workbench 18.0, ANSYS, Inc., Canonsburg, PennsylvaniaGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lin Z, Shen B, Sun F, Zhang Z, Guo S (2015) Numerical and experimental investigation of trapezoidal wire cold drawing through a series of shaped dies. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 76:1383–1391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lee IK, Lee SK, Lee CJ, Jeong MS, Lee JW (2016) A new method for predicting drawing load of shape drawing process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 84:1747–1755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gattmah J, Ozturk F, Orhan S (2017) Experimental and finite element analysis of residual stresses in cold tube drawing process with a fixed mandrel for AISI 1010 steel tube. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 93:1229–1241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Foadian F, Carrado A, Pirling T, Palkowski H (2016) Residual stresses evolution in cu tubes, cold drawn with tilted dies - neutron diffraction measurements and finite element simulation. J Mater Des 107:163–170Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ahn S, Park J, Won J, Kim H, Kang I, Cho Y, Shin S (2017) An analytical FEM-based study of the drawing process of an ultra-high-pressure common-rail fuel tube. J Mech Sci Technol 31:3389–3396CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nima Dabiri Farahani
    • 1
  • Ali Parvizi
    • 1
  • Ali Barooni
    • 1
  • Sina Anvari Naeini
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Mechanical Engineering, College of EngineeringUniversity of TehranTehranIran

Personalised recommendations