Skip to main content

Cutting force and surface roughness depend on the tool path used in side milling: an experimental investigation

Abstract

This paper proposes a method, based on the driven and self-propelled rotary tool cutting processes, using tool path strategies on side milling with a solid end mill to change the process kinematics. The main objective of this work is to evaluate the path’s influence on the cutting forces and surface roughness, and simultaneously the impact of milling parameters (cutting speed—v c , feed—f, and path period—T). A randomized experiment and a Taguchi Method were applied, and as a result of the experiments, the sinusoidal and triangular paths imply lower net forces (45–70%) and can improve surface quality with similar cutting times to the linear path method, as demonstrated by simulations. Mainly, the triangular and sinusoidal paths could increase the effective feed in the perpendicular direction of the programed feed; however, the maximum material thickness removed remains constant. Thus, this increase in feed causes a specific cutting force reduction, and consequently, forces become smaller than those on the linear path. It is possible to improve the surface roughness in comparison to the linear path, a 20–30% reduction, using the alternative paths (sinusoidal and triangular). Minimal cutting forces and surface roughness can be achieved with triangular path (also easier to program), path period T = 60 mm, cutting speed v c  = 120 m/min, and feed f = 0.1 mm/rev.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Kilic ZM, Altintas Y (2012) Stability of peripheral milling operations with long end mills. Procedia CIRP 4:103–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2012.10.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wang F, Zhao J, Li A, Zhao J (2014) Experimental study on cutting forces and surface integrity in high-speed side milling of Ti-6Al-4V titanium alloy. Mach Sci Technol 18(3):448–463. https://doi.org/10.1080/10910344.2014.926690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Buj-Corral I, Vivancos-Calvet J, González-Rojas H (2013) Roughness variation caused by grinding errors of cutting edges in side milling. Mach Sci Technol 17(4):575–592. https://doi.org/10.1080/10910344.2013.837350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Yang D, Liu Z (2015) Surface plastic deformation and surface topography prediction in peripheral milling with variable pitch end mill. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 91:43–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2014.11.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Budak E, Altintas Y (1995) Modeling and avoidance of static form errors in peripheral milling of plates. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 35(3):459–476. https://doi.org/10.1016/0890-6955(94)P2628-S

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Rodrigues MA, Hassui A, Lopes da Silva RH, Loureiro D (2016) Tool life and wear mechanisms during alloy 625 face milling. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 85(5-8):1439–1448. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-8056-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Nieslony P, Krolczyk GM, Wojciechowski S, Chudy R, Zak K, Maruda RW (2018) Surface quality and topographic inspection of variable compliance part after precise turning. Appl Surf Sci 434:91–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.10.158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Budak E, Altintas Y (1994) Peripheral milling conditions for improved dimensional accuracy. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 34(7):907–918. https://doi.org/10.1016/0890-6955(94)90024-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ramos a M, Relvas C, J a S (2003) The influence of finishing milling strategies on texture, roughness and dimensional deviations on the machining of complex surfaces. J Mater Process Technol 136(1-3):209–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(03)00160-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Perez H, Diez E, Perez J, Vizan a. (2013) Analysis of machining strategies for peripheral milling. Procedia Eng 63:573–581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2013.08.193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Monreal M, Rodriguez CA (2003) Influence of tool path strategy on the cycle time of high-speed milling. Comput Des 35(4):395–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-4485(02)00060-X

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wojciechowski S, Maruda RW, Krolczyk GM, Niesłony P (2017) Application of signal to noise ratio and grey relational analysis to minimize forces and vibrations during precise ball end milling. Precis Eng 51:582–596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precisioneng.2017.10.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. De Souza AF, Machado A, Beckert SF, Diniz AE (2014) Evaluating the roughness according to the tool path strategy when milling free form surfaces for mold application. Procedia CIRP 14:188–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2014.03.089

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wojciechowski S, Maruda RW, Barrans S, Nieslony P, Krolczyk GM (2017) Optimisation of machining parameters during ball end milling of hardened steel with various surface inclinations. Meas J Int Meas Confed 111:18–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2017.07.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. López de Lacalle LN, Lamikiz A, Sánchez JA, Salgado MA (2007) Toolpath selection based on the minimum deflection cutting forces in the programming of complex surfaces milling. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 47(2):388–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2006.03.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang SJ, To S, Cheung CF (2013) An investigation into material-induced surface roughness in ultra-precision milling. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 68(1-4):607–616. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-013-4781-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Armarego EJA, Karri V, Smith AJR (1994) Fundamental studies of driven and self-propelled rotary tool cutting processes—II. Experimental investigation. Int J Mach tools Manuf 34:803–815. https://doi.org/10.1016/0890-6955(94)90060-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. EJA A, Karri V, Smith AJR (1994) Fundamental studies of driven and self-propelled rotary tool cutting processes—I. Theoretical investigation. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 34(6):785–801. https://doi.org/10.1016/0890-6955(94)90059-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Olgun U, Budak E (2013) Machining of difficult-to-cut-alloys using rotary turning tools. Procedia CIRP 8:81–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2013.06.069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Suzuki N, Suzuki T, An R, Ukai K, Shamoto E, Hasegawa Y, Horiike N (2014) Force prediction in cutting operations with self-propelled rotary tools considering bearing friction. Procedia CIRP 14:125–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2014.03.033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sasahara H, Kato A, Nakajima H, Yamamoto H, Muraki T, Tsutsumi M (2008) High-speed rotary cutting of difficult-to-cut materials on multitasking lathe. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 48(7-8):841–850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2007.12.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kossakowska J, Jemielniak K (2012) Application of self-propelled rotary tools for turning of difficult-tomachine materials. Procedia CIRP 1:425–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2012.04.076

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kishawy HA, Pang L, Balazinski M (2011) Modeling of tool wear during hard turning with self-propelled rotary tools. Int J Mech Sci 53(11):1015–1021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2011.08.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Iyer NR, Koenigsberger F (1968) Experiments with self-propelled rotary cutting tools Int J Mach Tool Des Res 945:

  25. Trent EM, Wright PK (2000) Metal Cutting, 4th edn. Butterworth Heinemann, Woburn

    Google Scholar 

  26. Childs T, Maekawa K, Obikawa T, Yamane Y (2000) Metal machining: theory and applications, 1st edn. Arnold, London

    Google Scholar 

  27. Klocke F (2011) Manufacturing processes 1: cutting, 1st edn. Springer, Berlin. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-11979-8

    Book  Google Scholar 

  28. Groover MP (2007) Fundamentals of modern manufacturing: materials, processes , and systems, 3rd edn. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  29. Tschätsch H (2009) Applied machining technology. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01007-1

  30. Thiele JD, Melkote SN (1999) Effect of cutting edge geometry and workpiece hardness on surface generation in the finish hard turning of AISI 52100 steel. J Mater Process Technol 94(2-3):216–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(99)00111-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Denkena B, Biermann D (2014) Cutting edge geometries. CIRP Ann - Manuf Technol 63(2):631–653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2014.05.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. de Oliveira FB, Rodrigues AR, Coelho RT, de Souza AF (2015) Size effect and minimum chip thickness in micromilling. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 89:39–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2014.11.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Ramos AC, Autenrieth H, Strauß T, Deuchert M, Hoffmeister J, Schulze V (2012) Characterization of the transition from ploughing to cutting in micro machining and evaluation of the minimum thickness of cut. J Mater Process Technol 212(3):594–600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2011.07.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge professor I. S. Jawahir for advice during our period at the University of Kentucky. Also, the Brazilian research funding agencies Fundação Araucária [13/2014 - 4697.452.46755.29082014], CNPq (National Council for Scientific and Technological Development), CAPES (Federal Agency for the Support and Improvement of Higher Education), and FAPESP (São Paulo Research Foundation) for their financial support of this work. We would like to thank SENAI at Mogi Guaçu, represented by Ricardo Henrique Inácio for preparing the workpieces and making some equipment available and finally to Espaço da Escrita (Unicamp) that provided the English review.

Nomenclature

a p axial depth of cut (mm)

a e radial depth of cut (mm)

CAM computer-aided manufacturing

HSS high-speed steel

LN linear path

SIN sinusoidal path

TRIA triangular path

DST descending sawtooth path

AST ascending sawtooth path

RMS root mean square

F x direction “x” force

F y direction “y” force

F z direction “z” force

F net net force

Ra average of roughness profile (μm) v c – cutting speed (m/min)

f feed (mm/rev)

fz feed per tooth (mm/tooth)

p path

T period (mm)

ANOVA analysis of variance

S/N ratio signal to noise ratio

k s specific cutting force

θ helix angle

b undeformed chip width

l fz feed length per tooth

h undeformed cutting thickness

r e tool edge radius

SPRT self-propelled rotary tool

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rodrigo Henriques Lopes da Silva.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lopes da Silva, R.H., Hassui, A. Cutting force and surface roughness depend on the tool path used in side milling: an experimental investigation. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 96, 1445–1455 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-1680-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-1680-z

Keywords

  • Surface roughness
  • Size effect
  • Plowing
  • Cutting force
  • Design of experiment
  • Taguchi method