A new multi-source and dynamic energy modeling method for machine tools

  • Yan Wei
  • Zhang Hua
  • Jiang Zhi-gang
  • K. K. B. Hon
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • 71 Downloads

Abstract

Energy is a core part for the sustainable development of machine tool industry; its intensity and utilization has become increasingly important with the concern over global climate change. Machine tools, as a vital part of energy consumption, have major significance for energy savings and carbon emissions. To achieve such energy savings, a precise energy model of a machine tool is a primary register to provide decision support for energy efficiency evaluation and optimization. As there are numerous machine tool components and each with its own characteristic energy signature, the energy consumption of a machine tool has a complex multi-source and dynamic characteristic. To describe such characteristic, a new methodology of energy modeling is proposed with the components working states of machine tools. Firstly, the components of a machine tool are divided into two classifications according to their energy characteristics, i.e., time-varying units (TVUs) and non-time-varying units (NTVUs). Secondly, the working states and coupling relationship of TVUs and NTVUs are studied, and a segmented energy modeling method of TVUs and NTVUs is proposed. Thirdly, the work state execution and coupling relationship of TVUs and NTVUs are combined into a description model of machine tools based on the Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN), and the energy data association of the model is also studied. Finally, a case study of computer numerical control (CNC) milling machine is given to verify the effectiveness of the proposed model.

Keywords

Machine tool Time-varying and non-time-varying units Multi-source and dynamic characteristics Coupling relationship Business Process Model and Notation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful for the research support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 51775392 and 51675388), the National Hi-Tech Research and Development Program of China (No. 2014AA041504), and the Foundation of Wuhan University of Science & Technology (2015X2049).

References

  1. 1.
    Kone AC, Buke T (2010) Forecasting of CO2 emissions from fuel combustion using trend analysis. Renew Sust Energ Rev 14(9):2906–2915.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2010.06.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Parry ML, Canziani OF, Palutikof JP, Vander PJ, Hanson CE (2007) Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability, contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zhu S, Jiang ZG, Zhang H (2017) A carbon efficiency evaluation method for manufacturing process chain decision-making. J Clean Prod 148:665–680.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.159 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    National Bureau of Statistics of the People’s Republic of China (NBSC) (2010) China statistical yearbook 2010. China Statistics Press, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    International Energy Agency (IEA) (2007) Tracking industrial energy efficiency and CO2 emission. OECD/IEA, ParisGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Electronic Industries Association (EIA) (2008) U.S. carbon dioxide emissions from energy sources 2008 flash estimateGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jiang ZG, Zhou TT, Zhang H, Yan W, Cao HJ, Tian GD (2016) Reliability and cost optimization for remanufacturing process planning. J Clean Prod 135:1602–1610.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.11.037 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Li CB, Tang Y, Cui LG, Li PY (2015) A quantitative approach to analyze carbon emissions of CNC-based machining systems. J Intell Manuf 26(5):911–922.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-013-0812-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mori M, Fujishima M, Namasu YI, Oda Y (2011) A study on energy efficiency improvement for machine tools. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 60(1):145–148.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2011.03.099 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Vincent AB, Paul TM (2013) Modeling of direct energy requirements in mechanical machining processes. J Clean Prod 41:179–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dietmair A, Verl A (2009) Energy consumption forecasting and optimization for tool machines. J Mod Mach Sci 3:62–67Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Herrmann C, Thiede S (2009) Process chain simulation to foster energy efficiency in manufacturing. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol 1(4):221–229.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2009.06.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Liu F, Liu S (2012a) Multi-period energy model of electro-mechanical main driving system during the service process of machine tools. J Mech Eng 48(21):132–140.  https://doi.org/10.3901/JME.2012.21.132 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Liu S, Liu F, Wang QL (2012b) Energy efficiency acquisition method for electro-mechanical main driving system during the service process of machine tools. J Mech Eng 48(23):111–117.  https://doi.org/10.3901/JME.2012.23.111 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wang QL, Liu F, Wang XL (2014) Multi-objective optimization of machining parameters considering energy consumption. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 71(5-8):1133–1142.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-013-5547-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    He Y, Liu F, Wu T, Zhong FP, Peng B (2012) Analysis and estimation of energy consumption for numerical control machining. J Eng Manuf 226(2):255–266.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0954405411417673 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hu SH, Liu F, He Y, Hu T (2012) An on-line approach for energy efficiency monitoring of machine tools. J Clean Prod 27:133–140.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.01.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lv JX, Tang RZ, Jia S (2014) Therblig-based energy supply modeling of computer numerical control machine tools. J Clean Prod 65:168–177.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.09.055 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gong YQ, Lv M, Wang G, Zhou K (2007) Research on process knowledge management based on ontology. IEEE Int Conf Commun Serv Knowl Eng 5385–5388Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (2014) Machine tools—environmental evaluation of machine tools—Part1: design methodology for energy-saving machine tools. ISO 14955–1Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Michele C, Alberto T (2012) BPMN: an introduction to the standard. Comput Stand Interfaces (34):124–134Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cai ZL, Yi SP (2010) Business process integration modeling method based on business modeling notation. Comput Integr Manuf Syst 16(3):551–557Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Object Management Group (OMG) (2012) Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN) Version 2.0 [EB/OL]. [2010–07-14]. http://www.omg.org/spec/BPMN/2.0/Bata2. OMG Document Number: dtc/2010–05-03
  24. 24.
    Shi JL, Liu F, Xu DJ, Xie D (2010) Power balance equation about the numerical control machine tool’s main driver system driven by variable voltage variable frequency. J Mech Eng 46(3):118–124.  https://doi.org/10.3901/JME.2010.03.118 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gu SG (2007) Fundamentals of electrical machines and drives. China Machine Press, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Chen RY (2002) Metal-cutting principles. China Machine Press, BeijingGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yan Wei
    • 1
    • 2
  • Zhang Hua
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jiang Zhi-gang
    • 1
    • 2
  • K. K. B. Hon
    • 3
  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Metallurgical Equipment and Control Technology, Wuhan University of Science and TechnologyMinistry of EducationWuhanChina
  2. 2.Hubei Key Laboratory of Mechanical Transmission and Manufacturing EngineeringWuhan University of Science and TechnologyWuhanChina
  3. 3.School of EngineeringUniversity of LiverpoolLiverpoolUK

Personalised recommendations