Influence of mandrel on the forming quality of bending L-shaped hollow parts

  • Qun Guo
  • Fuye Ma
  • Xunzhong Guo
  • Jie Tao


In order to investigate the influence of mandrel on the forming quality of bending L-shaped hollow parts, three types of mandrels, which are polyurethane rubber mandrel, low-melting-point mandrel, and ball bearing mandrel. Polyurethane rubber mandrel and low-melting-point mandrel, which supposed as elastic–plastic deformable part in the numerical simulation. The effect of different forms of mandrel on the forming quality of L-shaped hollow parts, such as section deformation and wall thickness variation, were compared with push bending without a mandrel. The results show that the low-melting-alloy mandrel leads to a better formability and a more uniform tube thickness distribution compared with the polyurethane rubber mandrel and ball bearing mandrel, for the low-point-melting mandrel brings about smaller stress in the bending process. Cold push-bending trials of rectangular cross-section tubes were conducted successfully based on the finite element simulation results. The experimental results showed that the formability and quality of L-shaped tubes greatly improved compared to no mandrel, ball bearing mandrel, and rubber mandrel when the low-melting-point-alloy mandrel was used as the flexible mandrel.


L-shaped hollow parts Cold push-bending Low-melting-point-alloy mandrel Numerical simulation 


Funding information

The authors greatly acknowledge the financial support from the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (grant No. BK20151469), the Research Fund of Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics (grant No. YAH17019), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (grant No. NJ20150023, No. NJ20160035, and No. NJ20160036), and the Project funded by the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions.


  1. 1.
    Ku TW, Cha JH, Kim YB, Kwak OG, Kim WS, Kang BS (2013) A study on process parameters for cold U-bending of SUS304L heat transfer tube using rotary draw bending [J]. J Mech Sci Technol 27(10):3053–3061. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Li H, Yan H, Zhan M, Gu RJ (2007) The interactive effects of wrinkling and other defects in thin-walled tube NC bending process [J]. J Mater Process Technol 87–188(3):502–507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lima RJDS, Thome JR (2012) Two-phase flow patterns in U-bends and their contiguous straight tubes for different orientations, tube and bend diameters [J]. Int J Refrig 35(5):1439–1454. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Daxin E, Liu Y, Feng H (2010) Deformation analysis for the rotary draw bending process of circular tubes: stress distribution and wall thinning [J]. Steel Research International 81(12):1084–1088. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zhu YX, Liu YL, Yang H (2015) Effect of mandrel-cores on springback and sectional deformation of rectangular H96 tube NC bending [J]. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 78(1–4):351–360. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Shi SC, Yang LF, Guo C (2011) Deformation behaviors of tube rotary-draw bending filled with steel balls [J]. Adv Mater Res 328–330:1403–1407. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Liu K, Liu Y, Yang H (2015) A study on mandrel role in rotary draw bending of rectangular tube [J]. Int J Mater Prod Technol 50(1):65. MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zhao GY, Liu YL, Yang H, Lu CH, Gu RJ (2009) Three-dimensional finite-elements modeling and simulation of rotary-draw bending process for thin-walled rectangular tube [J]. Mater Sci Eng 499(1):257–261. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Guo X, Tao J, Yuan Z (2011) Effects of rigid mandrel and lubrication on the process of elbow parts by cold push-bending [J]. J Comput Theor Nanosci 4(8):2618–2622Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zhu YX, Liu YL, Li HP, Yang H (2013) Comparison between the effects of PVC mandrel and mandrel-cores die on the forming quality of bending rectangular H96 tube [J]. Int J Mech Sci 76(6):132–143. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    ASME code book Specification for seamless ferrite and austenitic alloy-steel boiler, super-heater and heat-exchanger tubes, Section II Part AGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    S Baudin, P Ray, BJM Donald, MSJ Hashmi (2004) Development of a novel method of tube bending using finite element simulation [J]. J Mater Process Technol. s (22): 153–154Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zhao GY, Liu YL, Yang H, Cai-Hong LU (2010) Cross-sectional distortion behaviors of thin-walled rectangular tube in rotary-draw bending process. Trans Nonferrous Metals Soc China 20(3):484–489. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yang H, Li H, Zhan M (2010) Friction role in bending behaviors of thin-walled tube in rotary-draw-bending under small bending radii [J]. J Mater Process Technol 210(15):2273–2284. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zeng Y, Li Z (2002) Experimental research on the tube push-bending process [J]. J Mater Process Technol 122(2–3):237–240. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Qun Guo
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Fuye Ma
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Xunzhong Guo
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Jie Tao
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Institute of Advanced Materials and Forming TechnologyNUAANanjingPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Nuclear Energy Equipment Materials EngineeringNanjingPeople’s Republic of China
  3. 3.College of Material Science and TechnologyNanjing University of Aeronautics and AstronauticsNanjingPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations