Direct metal laser-sintered stainless steel: comparison of microstructure and hardness between different planes
Microstructural analysis and micro-hardness measurements were performed on different planes of 316L stainless steel fabricated by direct metal laser sintering (DMLS) technique. A fine cellular network was observed within the steel microstructure, where morphology of most cells changed from columnar on XZ-plane (vertical section) to equiaxed on XY-plane (horizontal section). Correspondingly, morphology of most grains was found to alter from columnar for the XZ-plane to equiaxed in the case of the XY-plane. Moreover, X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis revealed a fully austenitic structure for both the planes. The average micro-hardness value for the XZ-plane and XY-plane was insignificantly (≈ 3%) different, which was attributed to the random grain orientation observed on both the planes. However, the average micro-hardness of the DMLS-fabricated 316L stainless steel in this contribution was approximately 25% higher than that of the as-cast one.
KeywordsAdditive manufacturing Stainless steel Microstructure Hardness DMLS
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
This effort was performed through the National Center for Defense Manufacturing and Machining under the America Makes Program entitled “Parametric Design of Functional Support Structures for Metal Alloy Feedstocks (Project 4047)” and is based on research sponsored by Air Force Research Laboratory under agreement number FA8650-12-2-7230. The US Government is authorized to reproduce and distribute reprints for Governmental purposes notwithstanding any copyright notation thereon. The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as necessarily representing the official policies, either expressed or implied, of the Government.
Distribution authorized to US Government Agencies and America Makes Members; Critical Technology. Other request for this document shall be referred to AFRL/RXMS, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH 45433–7750.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 4.Huang SH, Liu P, Mokasdar A, Hou L (2013) Additive manufacturing and its societal impact: a literature review. Int J Adv Manuf Technol:1–13Google Scholar
- 6.Aversa A, Lorusso M, Trevisan F, Ambrosio EP, Calignano F, Manfredi D, Biamino S, Fino P, Lombardi M, Pavese M (2017) Effect of process and post-process conditions on the mechanical properties of an A357 alloy produced via laser powder bed fusion. Metals 7(2):68. https://doi.org/10.3390/met7020068 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Criales LE, Arısoy YM, Lane B, Moylan S, Donmez A, Özel T (2017) Laser powder bed fusion of nickel alloy 625: experimental investigations of effects of process parameters on melt pool size and shape with spatter analysis. Int J Mach Tools ManufGoogle Scholar
- 9.Kazantseva N, Krakhmalev P, Yadroitsev I, Fefelov A, Merkushev A, Ilyinikh M, Vinogradova N, Ezhov I, Kurennykh T (2017) Oxygen and nitrogen concentrations in the Ti-6Al-4V alloy manufactured by direct metal laser sintering (dmls) process. Mater LettGoogle Scholar
- 10.AlMangour B, Yang J-M (2017) Understanding the deformation behavior of 17-4 precipitate hardenable stainless steel produced by direct metal laser sintering using micropillar compression and TEM. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 90(1–4):119–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9367-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Ghasri-Khouzani M, Peng H, Rogge R, Attardo R, Ostiguy P, Neidig J, Billo R, Hoelzle D, Shankar M (2017) Experimental measurement of residual stress and distortion in additively manufactured stainless steel components with various dimensions. Mater Sci Eng A 707:689-700. https://doi.org/10.1016/0956-7151(95)00110-H
- 13.Gratton A (2012) Comparison of mechanical, metallurgical properties of 17-4ph stainless steel between direct metal laser sintering (DMLS) and traditional manufacturing methods. 2012 NCURGoogle Scholar
- 14.Choi J-P, Shin G-H, Brochu M, Kim Y-J, Yang S-S, Kim K-T, Yang D-Y, Lee C-W, Yu J-H (2016) Densification behavior of 316L stainless steel parts fabricated by selective laser melting by variation in laser energy density. Mater Trans 57(11):1952–1959. https://doi.org/10.2320/matertrans.M2016284 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Delgado J, Ciurana J, Serenó L (2011) Comparison of forming manufacturing processes and selective laser melting technology based on the mechanical properties of products: in this work, the superior property of the selective laser melting technology is presented by comparing four real parts manufactured using forming processes and selective laser melting technology and analysed for tension, compression and flexural. Virtual Phys Prototyp 6(3):167–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Zietala M, Durejko T, Polanski M, Kunce I, Plocinski T, Zielinski W, Lazinska M, Stepniowski W, Czujko T, Kurzydlowski KJ (2016) The microstructure, mechanical properties and corrosion resistance of 316 L stainless steel fabricated using laser engineered net shaping. Materials science and engineering a—structural materials properties microstructure and processing 677 (EPFL-ARTICLE-225036):1-10Google Scholar
- 23.Manvatkar V, Gokhale A, Reddy GJ, Venkataramana A, De A (2011) Estimation of melt pool dimensions, thermal cycle, and hardness distribution in the laser-engineered net shaping process of austenitic stainless steel. Metall Mater Trans A 42(13):4080–4087. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-011-0787-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.Guo P, Zou B, Huang C, Gao H (2017) Study on microstructure, mechanical properties and machinability of efficiently additive manufactured AISI 316L stainless steel by high-power direct laser deposition. J Mater Process Technol 240:12–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2016.09.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar