The influence of electrode tip radius on dynamic resistance in spot welding

ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • 50 Downloads

Abstract

Electrode wear has a major impact on the quality of the spot welding joint. It is important to evaluate the electrode tip condition based on a simple method. In this paper, the dynamic resistance is analyzed, and the relationship between the dynamic resistance and the radius of electrode tip is investigated. It is difficult to obtain the relationship between the electrode tip radius and real-time dynamic resistance. The dynamic resistance is represented by the sum of the squares of the real-time resistances in every half cycle. It is virtually impossible to research the electrode tip radius based on only one dynamic resistance of spot welding joint. The average value of dozens of dynamic resistances should be analyzed, and the means of 20 dynamic resistances are analyzed in this study. The average value of dynamic resistances from the first to seventh cycle during the nugget-growth stage has a strong corresponding relation to the electrode tip radius, which can be used to evaluate the electrode wear.

Keywords

Spot welding Dynamic resistance Electrode tip radius 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research work was financially supported by The Province-University Joint Construction Plan of Jilin Province

References

  1. 1.
    Martín Ó, López M, Martín F (2007) Artificial neural networks for quality control by ultrasonic testing in resistance spot welding. J Mater Process Technol 183(2–3):226–233.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.10.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chen Z, Shi Y, Jiao B, Zhao H (2009) Ultrasonic nondestructive evaluation of spot welds for zinc-coated high strength steel sheet based on wavelet packet analysis. J Mater Process Technol 209(5):2329–2337.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.05.030 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hess WF, Wyant RA, Muller A (1940) The measurement of spot-welding current. Electr Eng 59(6):6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hao M, Osman KA, Boomer DR, Newton CJ (1996) Developments in characterization of resistance spot welding of aluminum. Weld J Incl Weld Res Suppl 75(1):S1–S8Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Podrzaj P, Polajnar I, Diaci J, Kariz Z (2004) Expulsion detection system for resistance spot welding based on a neural network. Meas Sci Technol 15(3):592–598.  https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/15/3/011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cho Y, Rhee S (2002) Primary circuit dynamic resistance monitoring and its application to quality estimation during resistance spot welding. Weld J 81(6):104s–111sGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zhou K, Cai L (2013) Online nugget diameter control system for resistance spot welding. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 68(9–12):2571–2588.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-013-4886-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gong L, Xi Y, Liu C (2013) Embedded artificial neuval network-based real-time half-wave dynamic resistance estimation during the A.C. Resistance spot welding process. Math Probl Eng 2013:1–7Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tseng KH, Chuang KJ (2012) Monitoring nugget size of micro resistance spot welding (Micro RSW) using electrode displacement-time curve. Adv Mater Res 463–464:107–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zhang H, Wang F, Xi T, Zhao J, Wang L, Gao W (2015) A novel quality evaluation method for resistance spot welding based on the electrode displacement signal and the Chernoff faces technique. Mech Syst Signal Process 62-63:431–443.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2015.03.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chen S, Sun T, Jiang X, Qi J, Zeng R (2016) Online monitoring and evaluation of the weld quality of resistance spot welded titanium alloy. J Manuf Process 23:183–191.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2016.06.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bhattacharya D.R.A.A.S. (1974) Quality control for production. The Production Engineer. p. 297–303Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dickinson D, Franklin J, Stanya A (1980) Characterization of spot welding behavior by dynamic electrical parameter monitoring. Weld J 59(6):170Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cho Y, Rhee S (2000) New technology for measuring dynamic resistance and estimating strength in resistance spot welding. Meas Sci Technol 11(8):1173–1178.  https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/11/8/311 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kaars J, Mayr P, Koppe K (2016) Generalized dynamic transition resistance in spot welding of aluminized 22MnB5. Mater Des 106:139–145.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2016.05.097 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Xing B, Xiao Y, Qin QH, Cui H (2017) Quality assessment of resistance spot welding process based on dynamic resistance signal and random forest based[J]. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 1–13Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Branco HLO, Okimoto PC (2012) Assessment of spot welding electrodes wearing and their influence on the quality of welded automotive galvanized sheets. Soldagem & Inspecao 17(4):347–355.  https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-92242012000400009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zou J, Zhao Q, Chen Z (2009) Surface modified long-life electrode for resistance spot welding of Zn-coated steel. J Mater Process Technol 209(8):4141–4146.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.10.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Association JS 2008 Railway rolling stock-spot welded joints of mild steel-design methods, JIS E4048, Tokyo, JapanGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wen J, Wang CS, Xu GC, Zhang XQ (2009) Real time monitoring weld quality of resistance spot welding for stainless steel. ISIJ Int 49(4):553–556.  https://doi.org/10.2355/isijinternational.49.553 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Materials Science and EngineeringJilin UniversityChangchunChina

Personalised recommendations