CFD research on particle movement and nozzle wear in the abrasive water jet cutting head
- 61 Downloads
Particle velocity and movement in the high-pressure abrasive water jet (AWJ) heading are significant jet properties which deserve a better understanding for improving AWJ machining performance. In this paper, particle acceleration and movement trajectory in the jet field within AWJ cutting head were conducted based on the Euler-Lagrange approach and the discrete particle model (DPM) from a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation study. The particle inlet position, particle inlet angle, and converge angle of focus tube were taken into consideration in the physical model. The models were then assessed qualitatively and quantitatively by previous experiment data. The results indicated that a particle inlet located at a high position could increase particles’ exiting velocity and decrease nozzle wear. A steeper abrasive feed angle would improve the particle acceleration process and reduce radial velocity, resulting in less nozzle weight loss. The effects of converging part angle were analyzed as well. The obtained results would improve the machine efficiency of the workpiece, extend nozzle lifetime, and guide the future design of AWJ nozzle.
KeywordsHigh-pressure abrasive water jet (AWJ) Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) Particle velocity and movement Nozzle wear
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
The authors thank Dr. Sawhney for his assistance in giving advice on conducting the simulation experiments.
- 5.Axinte DA, Karpuschewski B, Kong MC, Beaucamp AT, Anwar S, Miller D, Petzel M (2014) High energy fluid jet machining (HEFJet-Mach): from scientific and technological advances to niche industrial applications. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 63(1):751–771. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-8506(07)60430-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Liu D, Huang C, Wang J, Zhu H, Yao P, Liu Z (2014) Modeling and optimization of operating parameters for abrasive waterjet turning alumina ceramics using response surface methodology combined with Box–Behnken design. Ceram Int 40(6):7899–7908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2013.12.137 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Li Z, Geskin E, Tismenetskiy L (1994) Improvement of water-particles mixing in the course of abrasive waterjet formation. ASME-PUBLICATIONS-PED 68:405–405Google Scholar
- 10.Osman, A., Buisine, D., Thery, B. and Houssaye, G (1996) Measure of air flow rate according to the mixing chamber designs. In BHR Group Conference Series Publication 21:223-236. Mechanical Engineering Publications LimitedGoogle Scholar
- 17.Osman AH, Mabrouki T, Thery B, Buisine D (2004) Experimental analysis of high-speed air–water jet flow in an abrasive water jet mixing tube. Flow Meas Instrum 15(1):37–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2003.08.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Balz R, Heiniger KC (2011) Determination of spatial velocity distributions of abrasive particles in abrasive water jets using laser-induced fluorescence under real conditions. In Proceedings of 16th WJTA-IMCA Conference and ExpoGoogle Scholar
- 22.Miller D (2004) Fluid dynamics of abrasive waterjet cutting heads. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Water Jetting, Cranfield, Mainz, Germany, BHR Group Limited, pp 107–121Google Scholar
- 23.Ansys AF. 14.0 (2011) Theory guide. ANSYS Inc, Canonsburg, pp 218–221Google Scholar
- 25.Hashish M (2003) Inside AWJ nozzles. In Proc. of the WJTA American Waterjet Conference, pp 243-260Google Scholar
- 26.Sou A, Hosokawa S, Tomiyama A (2007) Effects of cavitation in a nozzle on liquid jet atomization. Int J Heat Mass Transf 50(17-18):3575–3582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2006.12.033 CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar