Experimental study of chemical mechanical polishing of the final surfaces of cemented carbide inserts for effective cutting austenitic stainless steel

  • Zihua Hu
  • Changjiang Qin
  • Zezhong C. Chen
  • Zhiping Yang
  • Tao Fang
  • Meijiao Mao


Defects of the final surfaces of cemented carbide inserts by means of conventional grinding method include grinding burn, crack, and thermal deformation, causing low cutting efficiency. To address the problems of the conventional way in grinding the insert surfaces, the chemical mechanical polishing (CMP) process is adopted in finish machining rake faces. First, the CMP process parameters are optimized with orthogonal experiments and Taguchi’s method, and the cemented carbide insert surfaces are made with 14.399 nm Ra of its rake face. Second, the inserts made with the conventional grinding and the CMP methods are used to lathe 1Cr18Ni9Ti austenitic stainless steel. Under the same cutting conditions, the cutting forces of the polished insert is less than those of the grinding insert, the cutting time of the polished insert is longer than that of the grinding insert, and the average life of the polished insert is 32.3% longer than that of the grinding insert. Finally, the scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and the energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) analysis have shown that the polished insert rake face has less adhesive wear , abrasive wear, and minor oxidation wear compared to the wear of the grinding insert rake face. This study demonstrates that the CMP is a potential way of processing the insert surfaces in the tooling industry.


Cemented carbide inserts Chemical mechanical polishing (CMP) Austenitic stainless steel Cutting performance 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.



The work is carried out using the unique facilities of the Zhuzhou Cemented Carbide Cutting Tools Co. Ltd. of China, which the authors greatly appreciate.

Funding information

This work is supported by the key programs of Hunan Provincial Department of science and technology of China (No. 2016GK2014), Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 2017JJ4055), and Hunan Provincial Innovation Foundation for Postgraduate of China (No. CX2016B231), which the authors greatly appreciate.


  1. 1.
    Sugihara T, Enomoto T (2015) High speed machining of Inconel 718 focusing on tool surface topography of CBN tool. Procedia Manuf 1:675–682. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Luo SY, Liu YC, Chou CC, Chen JP (2001) Performance of power filled resin-bonded diamond wheels in the vertical dry grinding of tungsten carbide. J Mater Process Technol 118(1–3):329–336. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hegeman JBJW, Hosson JTMD, With G (2001) Grinding of WC–Co hardmetals. Wear 248(1–2):187–196. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Koshy P, Jain VK, Lal GK (1997) Grinding of cemented carbide with electrical spark assistance. J Mater Process Technol 72(1):61–68. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kim JD, Lee ES (1999) A study of the mirror-like grinding of sintered carbide with optimum in-process electrolytic dressing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 15(9):615–623. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yin L, Spowage AC, Ramesh K, Huang H, Pickering JP, Vancoille EYJ (2004) Influence of microstructure on ultraprecision grinding of cemented carbides. Int J Mach Tool Manu 44(5):533–543. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ali I, Roy SR, Shinn G (1994) Chemical-mechanical polishing of interlayer dielectric: a review. Solid State Technol 37(10):63–70Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Malik F, Hasan M (1995) Manufacturability of the CMP process. Thin Solid Films 270(1–2):612–615. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Shi X, Rock SE, Turk MC, Roy D (2012) Minimizing the effects of galvanic corrosion during chemical mechanical planarization of aluminum in moderately acidic slurry solutions. Mater Chem Phys 136(2–3):1027–1037. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Luan X, Liu Y, Wang C, Niu X, Wang J, Zhang W (2016) A study on exploring the alkaline copper CMP slurry without inhibitors to achieve high planarization efficiency. Microelectron Eng 160:5–11. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Seo J, Kim JH, Lee M, You K, Moon J, Lee DH, Pailk U (2017) Multi-objective optimization of tungsten CMP slurry for advanced semiconductor manufacturing using a response surface methodology. Mater Des 117:131–138. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ozdemir Z, Ozdemir A, Basim GB (2016) Application of chemical and mechanical polishing process on titanium based implants. Mater Sci Eng 68:383–396. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Arsecularatne JA, Zhang LC, Montross C (2006) Wear and tool life of tungsten carbide, PCBN and PCD cutting tools. Int J Mach Tool Manu 46(5):482–491. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Astakhov VP (2004) The assessment of cutting tool wear. Int J Mach Tool Manu 44(6):637–647. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Mechanical EngineeringXiangtan UniversityXiangtanPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical and Industrial EngineeringConcordia UniversityMontrealCanada
  3. 3.Zhuzhou Cemented Carbide Cutting Tools Co. Ltd.ZhuzhouPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations