Instant detection of porosity in gas metal arc welding by using probability density distribution and control chart
- 42 Downloads
A novel porosity detection technique from the voltage and current transients is introduced in this paper. An online weld monitoring that detects the porosity at an earlier stage is much demanding in the industry due to their adverse effects on structural integrity. In this research work, control chart and probability density distribution have been employed as tools to detect arc instability and weld porosity. The results showed that the pattern of probability density distribution changes for the defect and defect-free welds significantly. The mean and standard deviation control charts plotted with voltage clearly distinguished the quality of the weld based on sample points spread within or outside the control limits. For minute internal porosities, the sample points at the corresponding region in the standard deviation control chart were outside the limits whereas it is well within the control limits in the mean control chart. Inspector can predict the presence and near location of porosity using these tools by simple mathematical calculations easily and instantly. The results proved that the developed approach is successful and promising for the weld inspection.
KeywordsGas metal arc welding Structural integrity Probability density distribution Control chart Porosity Online monitoring
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 6.Bouzid AH, Mourad AHI, El Domiaty A (2015) Impact of material behaviour modeling on the residual contact pressure in hydraulically expanded tube-to-tubesheet joints. In: Proc. ICPVT-14, Shanghai, China, pp. 1–10Google Scholar
- 8.Praveen P, Kang MJ, Yarlagadda KDVP (2006) Characterization of dynamic behaviour of short circuit in pulsed gas metal arc welding of aluminum. J Achiev Mater Manuf Eng 14:75–82Google Scholar
- 10.Rehfeldt D, Polte T (1999) Three systems for process monitoring, process analysis and quality determination in arc welding. In: Int. Conf. Join. Mater., Denmark, pp. 277–283Google Scholar
- 11.Rehfeldt D, Rehfeldt MD (2015) Statistical evaluation of GMAW process disturbances with signature analysis through ANALYSATOR HANNOVER. J Chem Pharm Sci (2015):274–279Google Scholar
- 12.Wu CS, Polte T, Rehfeldt D (2001) A fuzzy logic system for process monitoring and quality evaluation in GMAW. Weld J 80(2):33s–38sGoogle Scholar
- 16.Luksa K, Rymarski Z (2006) Collection of arc welding process data. J Achiev Mater Manuf Eng 17:377–380Google Scholar
- 20.Sumesh A, Thekkuden DT, Nair BB, Rameshkumar K, Mohandas K (2015) Acoustic signature based weld quality monitoring for SMAW process using data mining algorithms. Appl Mech Mater 813–814:1104–1113. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.813-814.1104 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.Rehfeldt D, Schmitz T (1997) Process monitoring and quality assurance for electric welding. Weld Surf Rev 8:187–199Google Scholar