Advertisement

Developing nanocomposite 3D printing filaments for enhanced integrated device fabrication

  • Daniel J. Thomas
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Abstract

In this research, an enhanced carbon nanotube-based filament has been formulated. Three concentrations of 0.5, 0.75 and 1% (wt) graphitized multiwalled carbon nanotubes have been dispersed into an acrylonitrile butadiene styrene polymer matrix under high sheer mixing. This formulation was extruded to form a 1.75-mm-diameter filament that was used to 3D print custom test components that were later tested and displayed both electrical conductivity and mechanical strength enhancement. These nanostructured 3D printing filament formulations were 3D printed to form a series of complex and sophisticated structures. I show how these novel formulations can be used to produce custom and high-performance devices. This advance in nanostructured 3D printing filaments offers a paradigm shift in the 3D printing domain for the fabrication of printed sensors which incorporate nanomaterials and reinforcement in the polymer matrix.

Keywords

Nanostructured polymers 3D printing Integrated electronics Printed electronics Nanotubes 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Reboul J-P, Moussalli G (1976) About some DC conduction processes in carbon black filled polymers. Int J Polym Mater 5(1–2):133–146.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00914037608072394 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Foulger SH (1999) Electrical properties of composites in the vicinity of the percolation threshold. J Appl Polym Sci 72(12):1573–1582.  https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19990620)72:12<1573::AID-APP10>3.0.CO;2-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lu J-R, Weng W-G, Chen X-F, Wu D-J, Wu C-L et al (2005) Piezoresistive materials from directed shear-induced assembly of graphite nanosheets in polyethylene. Adv Funct Mater 15:1358–1363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mosser V, Suski J, Goss J (1991) Piezoresistive pressure sensors based on polycrystalline silicon. Sensor Actuat A Phys 28(2):113–132.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0924-4247(91)85020-O CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yamada T, Hayamizu Y, Yamamoto Y, Yomogida Y, Izadi-Najafabadi A, Futaba DN, Hata K (2011) A stretchable carbon nanotube strain sensor for human-motion detection. Nat Nanotechnol 6(5):296–301.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2011.36 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zhenhai C, Luo RC (1998) Design and implementation of capacitive proximity sensor using microelectromechanical systems technology. IEEE T Ind Electron 45(6):886–894.  https://doi.org/10.1109/41.735332 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Avramov-Zamurovic S, Dagalakis NG, Lee RD, Yoo JM, Kim YS (2011) Embedded capacitive displacement sensor for nanopositioning applications. IEEE T Instrum Meas 60(7):2730–2737.  https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2011.2126150 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Postiglione G, Natale G, Griffini G, Levi M, Turri S (2015) Conductive 3D microstructures by direct 3D printing of polymer/carbon nanotube nanocomposites via liquid deposition modelling. Compos A: Appl Sci Manuf 76:110–114.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.05.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Czyżewski J, Burzyński P, Gaweł K (2009) Rapid prototyping of electrically conductive components using 3D printing technology. Compos Sci Technol 69(10):1486–1498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bauhofer W, Kovacs JZ (2006) A review and analysis of electrical percolation in carbon nanotube polymer composites. Carbon 44(9):1624–1652CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Engineering and Applied ScienceYale UniversityNew HavenUSA

Personalised recommendations