Advertisement

Experimental study of tool degradation in EDM processes: electrode material loss at the border and central zones

  • C. Mascaraque-Ramírez
  • P. Franco
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Abstract

The analysis and optimization of tool life is an essential key to enhance the performance of EDM processes as a manufacturing technology for naval, aerospace, automotive, and other different industrial sectors. For this reason, the study of electrode degradation as a consequence of the thermal effects originated on the tool surface is of great interest to improve these material removal processes. In the present work, the degradation of electrode geometry is analyzed as a function of some process parameters such as the current intensity selected for this material removal technology and the overall depth covered by the electrode during the machining of workpiece material. This study is focused on the analysis of the mechanisms that provoke the formation of a tool groove on the frontal surface of the electrode and the average worn depth evidenced on the electrode central zone. The topology of the worn surface of the cutting tool during die-sinking EDM is analyzed, and the current intensity and penetration depth were probed to present a great influence on the tool wear. According to the results of this work, the groove depth can be adopted to describe the tool groove from the selected cutting conditions and the material profile ratio can serve to characterize the surface texture on the central zone of the electrode active surface.

Keywords

Electro-discharge machining (EDM) Experimental analysis Surface morphology Tool wear 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Ho KH, Newman ST (2003) State of the art electrical discharge machining (EDM). Int J Mach Tools Manuf 43(13):1287–1300.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0890-6955(03)00162-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Joudivand Sarand MH, Shabgard MR (2015) Investigation of the effect of thermal diffusivity coefficient of tool material on electrode-tool wear in the EDM process. Arch Civil Mech Eng 15(4):806–821.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acme.2015.06.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mascaraque-Ramírez C, Franco P (2015) Experimental study of surface finish during electro-discharge machining of stainless steel. Proc Eng 132:679–685.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.12.547 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kiyak M, Aldemir BE, Altan E (2015) Effects of discharge energy density on wear rate and surface roughness in EDM. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 79(1):513–518.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-6840-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Puthumana G, Bissacco G, Hansen HN (2017) Modeling of the effect of tool wear per discharge estimation error on the depth of machined cavities in micro-EDM milling. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 92(9):3253–3264.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0371-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Malhotra P, Ambashta H, Mehndiratta C, Sachdeva L (2017) Effect of tool geometry on the performance of EDM. Int Res J Eng Technol (IRJET) 4(10):82–86 https://www.irjet.net/archives/V4/i10/IRJET-V4I1018.pdf Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Venugopal T, Rao AKMR (2017) Fabrication of differently shaped tool electrodes for micro-EDM. J Mater Sci Surf Eng 5(6):641–646 https://www.jmsse.in/files/561_Venugopal_T.R._et_al.PDF Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Torres A, Luis CJ, Puertas I (2015) Analysis of the influence of EDM parameters on surface finish, material removal rate, and electrode wear of an INCONEL 600 alloy. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 80(1):123–140.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-6974-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    D’Urso G, Merla C (2014) Workpiece and electrode influence on micro-EDM drilling performance. Prec Eng 38(4):903–914.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precisioneng.2014.05.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ekmekci B, Sayar A (2013) Debris and consequences in micro electric discharge machining of micro-holes. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 65(0):58–67.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2012.10.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kumar S, Dave HK, Desai KP (2016) Experimental investigation on performance of different tool movement strategies in EDM process for boring operation. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 87(5):1609–1620.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-8443-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Torres A, Luis CJ, Puertas I (2017) EDM machinability and surface roughness analysis of TiB2 using copper electrodes. J Alloys Comp 690:337–347.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.08.110 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yin Q, Wang B, Zhang Y, Ji F, Liu G (2014) Research of lower tool electrode wear in simultaneous EDM and ECM. J Mater Proc Technol 214(8):1759–1768.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2014.03.025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kuo C, Kao H, Wang H (2017) Novel design and characterisation of surface modification in wire electrical discharge machining using assisting electrodes. J Mater Proc Technol 244:136–149.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.01.025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kumar SV, Kumar MP (2015) Experimental investigation of the process parameters in cryogenic cooled electrode in EDM. J Mech Sci Technol 29(9):3865–3871.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-015-0832-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Steuer P, Weber O, Bähre D (2015) Structuring of wear-affected copper electrodes for electrical discharge machining using pulse electrochemical machining. Int J Refractory Met Hard Mater 52:85–89.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2015.05.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lin Y-C, Hung J-C, Chow H-M, Wang AC, Chen J-T (2016) Machining characteristics of a hybrid process of EDM in gas combined with ultrasonic vibration and AJM. Procedia CIRP 42:167–172.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.02.213 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Uhlmann E, Domingos DC (2016) Automated dressing of graphite electrodes for electrical discharge machining (EDM) of seal slots in turbine components. Proc Manuf 6:45–52.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2016.11.007 Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Habib MA, Rahman M (2016) Performance of electrodes fabricated by localized electrochemical deposition (LECD) in micro-EDM operation on different workpiece materials. J Manuf Proc 24(Part 1):78–89.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2016.08.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Trych-Wildner A, Wildner K (2017) Multifilament carbon fibre tool electrodes in micro EDM—evaluation of process performance based on influence of input parameters. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 91(9):3737–3747.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0041-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Li H, Wang Z, Wang Y, Liu H, Bai Y (2017) Micro-EDM drilling of ZrB2-SiC-graphite composite using micro sheet-cylinder tool electrode. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 92(5):2033–2041.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0296-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lee C-S, Heo E-Y, Kim J-M, Choi I-H, Kim D-W (2015) Electrode wear estimation model for EDM drilling. Robotics Comp-Integr Manuf 36:70–75.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2015.02.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Pei J, Zhang L, Du J, Zhuang X, Zhou Z, Wu S, Zhu Y (2017) A model of tool wear in electrical discharge machining process based on electromagnetic theory. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 117:31–41.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2017.03.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Barenji RV, Pourasl HH, Khojastehnezhad VM (2016) Electrical discharge machining of the AISI D6 tool steel: prediction and modeling of the material removal rate and tool wear ratio. Prec Eng 45:435–444.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precisioneng.2016.01.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Nirala CK, Saha P (2017) Precise μEDM-drilling using real-time indirect tool wear compensation. J Mater Proc Technol 240:176–189.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2016.09.024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Moghanizadeh A (2017) Reducing side overcut in EDM process by changing electrical field between tool and work piece. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 90(1):1035–1042.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9427-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Departamento de Tecnologia NavalUniversidad Politecnica de CartagenaCartagenaSpain
  2. 2.Departamento de Ingenieria de Materiales y FabricacionUniversidad Politecnica de CartagenaCartagenaSpain

Personalised recommendations