Numerical and experimental study on the layer arrangement in the incremental forming process of explosive-welded low-carbon steel/CP-titanium bimetal sheet

  • M. R. Sakhtemanian
  • M. HonarpishehEmail author
  • S. Amini


In this paper, the effect of layers’ arrangement of explosively welded low-carbon steel/commercially pure titanium (St/CP-Ti) bimetal sheet has been investigated in the single point incremental forming process (SPIF) experimentally and numerically. The main reason to carry out such a process is taking the advantages of materials with different properties, such as high strength, low density, low price, and corrosion resistibility, at the same time and in a single component. The composite sheet behavior in a forming process differs from single-layer sheets and depends on the layers’ arrangement and thicknesses. In this regard, the effect of layers’ arrangement on the forming behavior of (St/CP-Ti) bimetal sheet is of particular interest in the present study. Therefore, several tests were conducted to investigate the influences of some variables, such as layers’ arrangement and different vertical steps down on the variations of force versus time diagram. Based on the obtained results, the arrangement of Ti–St showed a higher forming force than St–Ti, and the force difference between two arrangements increased with an increase in vertical steps down; as for vertical steps down of 0.1, 0.2, and 0.3, the force difference for the two arrangements was about 8, 15, and 25%, respectively, which showed good agreement with the FEM results. Also, microstructural studies showed that the twin density in the structure would differ, such that the twinning density of titanium layer in Ti–St mode was increased more than twice as much as the St–Ti mode and therefore would show more work hardening during the deformation, which was considered as a factor for the force difference in both types of arrangements. Also, the scanning electron microscope studies of the formed specimen’s surfaces showed a better surface quality in the samples with the St–Ti arrangement, which is due to the titanium sticking friction with the forming tool that causes in the samples with the Ti–St arrangement.


Incremental forming Layer arrangement Explosive-welded bimetals Low-carbon steel/CP-titanium 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Gatea S, Hengan O, McCartney G (2016) Review on the influence of process parameters in incremental sheet forming. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 87(1-4):479–499. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Li Y, Liu Z, Lu H, Daniel WJT(B), Liu S, Meehan PA (2014) Efficient force prediction for incremental sheet forming and experimental validation. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 73:571–587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bahloul R, Arfa H, BelHadjSalah H (2014) A study on optimal design of process parameters in single point incremental forming of sheet metal by combining Box–Behnken design of experiments, response surface methods and genetic algorithms. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 74(1-4):163–185. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Li J, Li S, Xie Z, Wang W (2015) Numerical simulation of incremental sheet forming based on GTN damage model. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 81(9-12):2053–2065. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Silva MB, Skjødt M, Martins PA, Bay N (2008) Revisiting the fundamentals of single point incremental forming by means of membrane analysis. Int J Mach Tool Manu 48(1): 73-83.
  6. 6.
    Smith J, Rajiv M, Liu WK, Cao J (2013) Deformation mechanics in single-point and accumulative double-sided incremental forming. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 69:1185–1201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Liu Z, Li Y, Meehan PA (2014) Tool path strategies and deformation analysis in multi-pass incremental sheet forming process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 75(1-4):395–409. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Liu Z, Li Y, Meehan PA (2013) Experimental investigation of mechanical properties, formability and force measurement for AA7075-O aluminum alloy sheets formed by incremental forming. Int J Precis Eng Manuf 14:1891–1899CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ben Hmida R, Thibaud S, Gilbin A, Richard F (2013) Influence of the initial grain size in single point incremental forming process for thin sheets metal and microparts: experimental investigations. Mater Des 45:155–165. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zhen C, Cedric Xia Z, Ren F, VijithaKiridena LG (2013) Modeling and validation of deformation process for incremental sheet forming. J Manuf Process 15:236–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ambrogio G, Gagliardi F, Bruschi S, Filice L (2013) On the high-speed single point incremental forming of titanium alloys. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 62(1):243–246. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fanga Y, Lua B, Chena J, Xua DK, Oub H (2014) Analytical and experimental investigations on deformation mechanism and fracture behavior in single point incremental forming. J Mater Process Technol 214(8):1503–1515. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Li Y, Daniel WJT, Liu Z, Lu H, Meehan PA (2015) Deformation mechanics and efficient force prediction in single point incremental forming. J Mater Process Technol 221:100–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Honarpisheh M, Abdolhoseini MJ, Amini S (2016) Experimental and numerical investigation of the hot incremental forming of Ti-6Al-4V sheet using electrical current. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 83:2027–2037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Findik F (2011) Recent developments in explosive welding. Mater Des 32(3):1081–1093. MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kapinski S (1996) Analytical and experimental analysis of deep drawing process for bimetal elements. J Mater Process Technol 60(1-4):197–200. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chen C-Y, Kuo J-C, Chen H-L, Hwang W-S (2006) Experimental investigation on earing behavior of aluminum/copper bimetal sheet. Mater Trans 47(9):2434–2443. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Atrian A, Fereshteh-Saniee F (2013) Deep drawing process of steel/brass laminated sheets. Compos Part B 47:75–81. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tao S, Shengdun Z, Guanhai Y, Hongbao L (2013) Plastic forming behavior of axisymmetric bimetal products with rotary swaging. Eng Sci 11:44–47Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Essa K, Kacmarcik I, Hartley P, Plancak M, Vilotic D (2012) Upsetting of bi-metallic ring billets. J Mater Process Technol 212(4):817–824. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Haghighat H, Mahdavi MM (2013) Upper bound analysis of bimetallic rod extrusion process through rotating conical dies. J Theor Appl Mech 51:627–637Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Asemabadi M, Sedighi M, Honarpisheh M (2012) Investigation of cold rolling influence on the mechanical properties of explosive-welded Al/Cu bimetal. Mater Sci Eng A 558:144–149. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Honarpisheh M, Niksokhan J, Nazari F (2016) Investigation of the effects of cold rolling on the mechanical properties of explosively-welded Al/St/Al multilayer sheet. Metallur Res Technol 113(1):105. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sedighi M, Honarpisheh M (2012) Investigation of cold rolling influence on near surface residual stress distribution in explosive welded multilayer. Strength Mater 44(6):693–698. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Durante M, Formisano A, Langella A, MemolaCapeceMinutolo F (2009) The influence of tool rotation on an incremental forming process. J Mater Process Technol 209(9):4621–4626. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Petek A, Kuzman K, Suhač BA (2009) On-line system for fracture identification at incremental sheet forming. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 58(1):283–286. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ambrogio G, Filice L, Micari F (2006) A force measuring based strategy for failure prevention in incremental forming. J Mater Process Technol 177(1-3):413–416. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Duflou J, Tunçkol Y, Szekeres A, Vanherck P (2007) Experimental study on force measurements for single point incremental forming. J Mater Process Technol 189(1-3):65–72. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Arfa H, Bahloul R, BelHadjSalah H (2013) Finite element modelling and experimental investigation of single point incremental forming process of aluminum sheets: influence of process parameters on punch force monitoring and on mechanical and geometrical quality of parts. Int J Mater Form 6(4):483–510. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Xu-hu Z, Bin T, Xia-lu Z, Hong-chao K, Jin-shan L, Lian Z (2012) Microstructure and texture of commercially pure titanium in cold deep drawing. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc Chin 22:496–502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Chuna YB, Yu SH, Semiatin SL, Hwang SK (2005) Effect of deformation twinning on microstructure and texture evolution during cold rolling of CP-titanium. Mater Sci Eng A 398(1-2):209–219. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Chun XU, Wen-feng ZHU (2012) Comparison of microstructures and mechanical properties between forging and rolling processes for commercially pure titanium. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China 22:1939–1946CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Wyatt ZW, Joost WJ, Zhu D, Ankem S (2012) Deformation mechanisms and kinetics of time-dependent twinning in an α-titanium alloy. Int J Plast 39:119–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hussaina G, Gaoa L, Hayatb N, Cuia Z, Pangc YC, Dard NU (2008) Tool and lubrication for negative incremental forming of a commercially pure titanium sheet. J Mater Process Technol 203(1-3):193–201. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of KashanKashanIran

Personalised recommendations