Advertisement

Effect of nano-filler graphene on nano-composite system of polystyrene-graphene

  • Tauseef Aized
  • Muhammad Imran
  • Hassan Raza
  • Muhammad Rafi Raza
  • Ghulam Abbas Gohar
  • Ammar Iqbal
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • 114 Downloads

Abstract

By using N-methyl-2-pyrolidone (NMP) and tetrahydrofuran (THF) solvents, the yield of two-dimensional material graphene as carried out via a technique called liquid exfoliation, phases including dispersal of preponderant material (graphite), sonicating the elevated surface tension solvents and decontamination for the eradication of impurities and remnant were implied in this yield. Now, these progressions were implemented by the use of bath Sonicator, ultracentrifuge, and probe Sonicator. Few-layer graphene (FLG) was originated which fused into intricate architecture (polymer matrix) in order to yield nano-composites of polystyrene and graphene via the technique of solution forming at contrasting filler loadings. The study of the upshot of graphene nano-filler, at divergent wt% ages of graphene’s exfoliation at scanty percolation, i.e., (EG) (i = 0, 0.1, 0.3, 0.5, 0.7, 0.9) on mechanical, microstructural, thermal, and electrical properties of polystyrene matrix, was carried out. This was done with the help of atomic force microscopy (AFM), four-probe method, X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and universal testing machine (UTM). The 1-μm occurrence of two-dimensional sheets of graphene was marked by the SEM outcomes, whereas the composite system that contains polystyrene crests and graphene planes was ascertained via XRD testing. The 0.757-nm thickness which clearly specified the two-dimensional sheets was reckoned by AFM. The maximum increase, in mechanical properties including ultimate tensile strength (UTS), modulus of elasticity (E), and percentage elongation at break point, was 74.75, 150, and 68.65% respectively as related to the pure sample of polystyrene that was accounted in this research at scanty percolation (EG = 0.9 wt%). These properties are the function of filler loading. Electrical conductivity and electrical resistivity were evaluated; an intensification of 121.26% at 0.9% in electrical conductivity of filler loading as related to pure polystyrene was accounted whereas the electrical resistivity was diminished up to 121.19% at the identical filler loading. The ultimate increase in the thermal conductivity was 123.71% at concentration 0.9 wt% of the filler as confirmed by thermal conductivity outcomes. The better dispersion of the filler in the matrix and higher interfacial contact between the filler and polymer create these increasing trends.

Keywords

Liquid exfoliation method Mechanical properties Graphene Electrical properties Thermal properties Nano-filler 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Castellanos-Gomez A (2016) Why all the fuss about 2D semiconductors? arXiv preprint arXiv 1604:06425Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    G. Qin and M. Hu, Diverse thermal transport properties of two-dimensional materials: a comparative review, in Two-dimensional materials-synthesis, characterization and potential applications: InTech, 2016Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kim H, Abdala AA, Macosko CW (2010) Graphene/polymer nanocomposites. Macromolecules 43(16):6515–6530.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ma100572e CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Novoselov K, Geim A (2007) The rise of graphene. Nat. Mater 6:183–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Li D, Muller MB, Gilje S, Kaner RB, Wallace GG (2008) Processable aqueous dispersions of graphene nanosheets. Nat Nanotechnol, Research Support, Non-U S Gov't 3(2):101–105Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wang X, Song L, Pornwannchai W, Hu Y, Kandola B (2013) The effect of graphene presence in flame retarded epoxy resin matrix on the mechanical and flammability properties of glass fiber-reinforced composites. Compos A: Appl Sci Manuf 53:88–96.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2013.05.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rafiee MA, Rafiee J, Wang Z, Song H, Yu Z-Z, Koratkar N (2009) Enhanced mechanical properties of nanocomposites at low graphene content. ACS Nano 3(12):3884–3890.  https://doi.org/10.1021/nn9010472 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Liem H, Choy H (2013) Superior thermal conductivity of polymer nanocomposites by using graphene and boron nitride as fillers. Solid State Commun 163:41–45.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssc.2013.03.024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yasmin A, Luo J-J, Daniel IM (2006) Processing of expanded graphite reinforced polymer nanocomposites. Compos Sci Technol 66(9):1182–1189.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.10.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kuilla T, Bhadra S, Yao D, Kim NH, Bose S, Lee JH (2010) Recent advances in graphene based polymer composites. Prog Polym Sci 35(11):1350–1375.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2010.07.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Alexandre M, Dubois P (2000) Polymer-layered silicate nanocomposites: preparation, properties and uses of a new class of materials. Materials Science and Engineering: R: Reports 28(1):1–63.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0927-796X(00)00012-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Liang J, Huang Y, Zhang L, Wang Y, Ma Y, Guo T, Chen Y (2009) Molecular-level dispersion of graphene into poly (vinyl alcohol) and effective reinforcement of their nanocomposites. Adv Funct Mater 19(14):2297–2302.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.200801776 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hwang S-H, Kang D, Ruoff RS, Shin HS, Park Y-B (2014) Poly (vinyl alcohol) reinforced and toughened with poly (dopamine)-treated graphene oxide, and its use for humidity sensing. ACS Nano 8(7):6739–6747.  https://doi.org/10.1021/nn500504s CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lee YR, Raghu AV, Jeong HM, Kim BK (2009) Properties of waterborne polyurethane/functionalized graphene sheet nanocomposites prepared by an in situ method. Macromol Chem Phys 210(15):1247–1254.  https://doi.org/10.1002/macp.200900157 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Novoselov KS, Neto AHC (2012) Two-dimensional crystals-based heterostructures: materials with tailored properties. Physica Scripta 2012(T146):014006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Li X, Magnuson CW, Venugopal A, Tromp RM, Hannon JB, Vogel EM, Colombo L, Ruoff RS (2011) Large-area graphene single crystals grown by low-pressure chemical vapor deposition of methane on copper. J Am Chem Soc 133(9):2816–2819.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ja109793s CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nicolosi V, Chhowalla M, Kanatzidis MG, Strano MS, Coleman JN (2013) Liquid exfoliation of layered materials. Science 340(6139):1226419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bonaccorso F, Lombardo A, Hasan T, Sun Z, Colombo L, Ferrari AC (2012) Production and processing of graphene and 2d crystals. Mater Today 15(12):564–589.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-7021(13)70014-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hernandez Y, Nicolosi V, Lotya M, Blighe FM, Sun Z, De S, McGovern IT, Holland B, Byrne M, Gun'Ko YK, Boland JJ, Niraj P, Duesberg G, Krishnamurthy S, Goodhue R, Hutchison J, Scardaci V, Ferrari AC, Coleman JN (2008) High-yield production of graphene by liquid-phase exfoliation of graphite. Nat Nanotechnol 3(9):563–568.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2008.215 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Coleman JN, Lotya M, O'Neill A, Bergin SD, King PJ, Khan U, Young K, Gaucher A, De S, Smith RJ, Shvets IV, Arora SK, Stanton G, Kim HY, Lee K, Kim GT, Duesberg GS, Hallam T, Boland JJ, Wang JJ, Donegan JF, Grunlan JC, Moriarty G, Shmeliov A, Nicholls RJ, Perkins JM, Grieveson EM, Theuwissen K, McComb DW, Nellist PD, Nicolosi V (2011) Two-dimensional nanosheets produced by liquid exfoliation of layered materials. Science 331(6017):568–571.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1194975 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Durge R, Kshirsagar R, Tambe P (2014) Effect of sonication energy on the yield of graphene nanosheets by liquid-phase exfoliation of graphite. Procedia Engineering 97:1457–1465.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2014.12.429 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Behrens M (1939) Über die Verteilung: der Lipase und Arginase zwischen Zellkern und Protoplasma der Leber. Mit 1 Figur im Text, Hoppe-Seyler´ s. Z Physiol Chem 258(1):27–32.  https://doi.org/10.1515/bchm2.1939.258.1.27 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lu L, Zhu Y, Shi C, Pei YT (2016) Large-scale synthesis of defect-selective graphene quantum dots by ultrasonic-assisted liquid-phase exfoliation. Carbon 109:373–383.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2016.08.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Güler Ö, Güler SH (2016) Production of graphene–boron nitride hybrid nanosheets by liquid-phase exfoliation. Optik - International Journal for Light and Electron Optics 127(11):4630–4634.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2016.02.033 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tauseef Aized
    • 1
  • Muhammad Imran
    • 2
  • Hassan Raza
    • 2
  • Muhammad Rafi Raza
    • 2
  • Ghulam Abbas Gohar
    • 2
  • Ammar Iqbal
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of Engineering and TechnologyLahorePakistan
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical EngineeringCOMSATS Institute of Information TechnologySahiwalPakistan

Personalised recommendations