Advertisement

A bi-objective model for a multi-echelon supply chain design considering efficiency and customer satisfaction: a case study in plastic parts industry

  • Seyed Babak Ebrahimi
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Abstract

One of the fundamental challenges of today’s manufacturing systems is the contradiction between cost efficiency and customer satisfaction. Finding a good balance between good customer satisfaction and supply chain efficiency is a critical problem in the supply chain management. To achieve this goal, a bi-objective mathematical model is suggested in this paper to maximize the efficiency of network and also customer satisfaction. This multi-period and multi-product supply chain network design model consists of suppliers, factories, distribution centers (DCs), and customers. The proposed bi-objective mixed-integer non-linear programming (MINLP) model is a member of the NP-hard class of optimization problems. Hence, two well-known multi-objective metaheuristic algorithms namely, Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II) and Non-dominated Ranked Genetic Algorithm (NRGA) are employed to solve the proposed model. The author uses Taguchi method for tuning the parameters of algorithms in order to achieve better performances. Moreover, a case study in the plastic industry is performed to collect data from the north region of Iran. Some well-known multi-objective metrics such as analysis of variance (ANOVA) is used to measure the performance of the proposed framework. Finally, results demonstrate the efficiency of the proposed framework.

Keywords

Supply chain network design Customer satisfaction Multi-objective metaheuristic algorithm Plastic industry Taguchi method 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Pham T, Yenradee P (2017) Optimal supply chain network design with process network and BOM under uncertainties: a case study in toothbrush industry. Comput Ind Eng 108:177–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cheraghalipour A, Paydar MM, Hajiaghaei-keshteli M (2017) An integrated approach for collection center selection in reverse logistics. Int J Eng Trans A Basics 30(7):1005–1016Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sarrafha K, Rahmati SHA, Niaki STA, Zaretalab A (2015) A bi-objective integrated procurement, production, and distribution problem of a multi-echelon supply chain network design: a new tuned MOEA. Comput Oper Res 54:35–51MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Randall TR, Morgan RM, Morton AR (2003) Efficient versus responsive supply chain choice: an empirical examination of influential factors. J Prod Innov Manag 20(6):430–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Altiparmak F, Gen M, Lin L, Paksoy T (2006) A genetic algorithm approach for multi-objective optimization of supply chain networks. Comput Ind Eng 51(1):196–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Xu J, Liu Q, Wang R (2008) A class of multi-objective supply chain networks optimal model under random fuzzy environment and its application to the industry of Chinese liquor. Inf Sci 178(8):2022–2043CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Azaron A, Brown KN, Tarim SA, Modarres M (2008) A multi-objective stochastic programming approach for supply chain design considering risk. Int J Prod Econ 116(1):129–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wang F, Lai X, Shi N (2011) A multi-objective optimization for green supply chain network design. Decis Support Syst 51(2):262–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Almaktoom AT, Krishnan KK, Wang P, Alsobhi S (2014) Assurance of system service level robustness in complex supply chain networks. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 74(1–4):445–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Almaktoom AT, Krishnan KK, Wang P, Alsobhi S (2016) Cost efficient robust global supply chain system design under uncertainty. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 85(1–4):853–868CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Farahani RZ, Rezapour S, Drezner T, Fallah S (2014) Competitive supply chain network design: an overview of classifications, models, solution techniques and applications. Omega 45:92–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Eskandarpour M, Dejax P, Miemczyk J, Péton O (2015) Sustainable supply chain network design: an optimization-oriented review. Omega 54:11–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ghaderi H, Pishvaee MS, Moini A (2016) Biomass supply chain network design: an optimization-oriented review and analysis. Ind Crop Prod 94:972–1000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ghomi-Avili M, Jalali Naini SG, Tavakkoli-Moghaddam R, Jabbarzadeh A (2017) A network design model for a resilient closed-loop supply chain with lateral transshipment. Int J Eng 30(3):374–383Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Karabakal N, Günal A, Ritchie W (2000) Supply-chain analysis at Volkswagen of America. Interfaces (Providence) 30(4):46–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Verter V, Dasci A (2002) The plant location and flexible technology acquisition problem. Eur J Oper Res 136(2):366–382CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yeh W-C (2005) A hybrid heuristic algorithm for the multistage supply chain network problem. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 26(5–6):675–685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Choi J, Lee H, Heo S, Lee J (2006) A mathematical programming for supply chain network design, in 2006 SICE-ICASE International Joint Conference, pp 170–174Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lee J-H, Moon I-K, Park J-H (2010) Multi-level supply chain network design with routing. Int J Prod Res 48(13):3957–3976CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jabbarzadeh A, Fahimnia B, Seuring S (2014) Dynamic supply chain network design for the supply of blood in disasters: a robust model with real world application. Transport Res E Log Transport Rev 70:225–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Anne KR, Chedjou JC, Kyamakya K (2009) Bifurcation analysis and synchronisation issues in a three-echelon supply chain. Int J Log Res Appl 12(5):347–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ramezani M, Bashiri M, Tavakkoli-Moghaddam R (2013) A robust design for a closed-loop supply chain network under an uncertain environment. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 66(5–8):825–843CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Khalili-Damghani K, Tavana M, Amirkhan M (2014) A fuzzy bi-objective mixed-integer programming method for solving supply chain network design problems under ambiguous and vague conditions. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 73(9–12):1567–1595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Dubey R, Gunasekaran A, Childe SJ (2015) The design of a responsive sustainable supply chain network under uncertainty. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 80(1–4):427–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Varsei M, Polyakovskiy S (2017) Sustainable supply chain network design: a case of the wine industry in Australia. Omega 66:236–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Özceylan E, Demirel N, Çetinkaya C, Demirel E (2016) A closed-loop supply chain network design for automotive industry in Turkey. Comput Ind Eng 113:727–745  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2016.12.022
  27. 27.
    de Keizer M, Groot JJ, Bloemhof J, van der Vorst JGAJ (2014) Logistics orchestration scenarios in a potted plant supply chain network. Int J Log Res Appl 17(2):156–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Benyoucef L, Xie X, Tanonkou GA (2013) Supply chain network design with unreliable suppliers: a Lagrangian relaxation-based approach. Int J Prod Res 51(21):6435–6454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Yi P, Huang M, Guo L, Shi T (2016) A retailer oriented closed-loop supply chain network design for end of life construction machinery remanufacturing. J Clean Prod 124:191–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Dubey R, Gunasekaran A (2015) Retracted article: Sustainable supply chain network design: a case of Indian company. Int J Log Res Appl 18(5):1–23Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Zhang L, Zhou Y (2012) A new approach to supply chain network equilibrium models. Comput Ind Eng 63(1):82–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Taxakis K, Papadopoulos C (2016) A design model and a production–distribution and inventory planning model in multi-product supply chain networks. Int J Prod Res 54(21):6436–6457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Farrokh M, Azar A, Jandaghi G, Ahmadi E (2017) A novel robust fuzzy stochastic programming for closed loop supply chain network design under hybrid uncertainty. Fuzzy Sets Syst (in press  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2017.03.019)
  34. 34.
    Deb K, Pratap A, Agarwal S, Meyarivan T (2002) A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 6(2):182–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Al Jadaan O, Rao CR, Rajamani L (2008) Non-dominated ranked genetic algorithm for solving multi-objective optimization problems: NRGA. J Theor Appl Inf Technol 4(1):60–67Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Rahmati SHA, Hajipour V, Niaki STA (2013) A soft-computing Pareto-based meta-heuristic algorithm for a multi-objective multi-server facility location problem. Appl Soft Comput J 13(4):1728–1740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Karimi N, Zandieh M, Karamooz HR (2010) Bi-objective group scheduling in hybrid flexible flowshop: a multi-phase approach. Expert Syst Appl 37(6):4024–4032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Taguchi G (1986) Introduction to quality engineering: designing quality into products and processes, Illustrate. The Organization, White PlainsGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Maghsoudlou H, Kahag MR, Niaki STA, Pourvaziri H (2016) Bi-objective optimization of a three-echelon multi-server supply-chain problem in congested systems: modeling and solution. Comput Ind Eng 99:41–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Industrial EngineeringK. N. Toosi University of TechnologyTehranIran

Personalised recommendations