Advertisement

RCM implementation on plastic injection molding machine considering correlated failure modes and small size sample

  • Marco A. Fuentes-Huerta
  • David S. González-González
  • Mario Cantú-Sifuentes
  • Rolando J. Praga-Alejo
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Abstract

Maintenance has become an important support for ensuring equipment availability, on-time deliveries and quality of products. In that sense, reliability-centered maintenance (RCM) could be used due to its basic characteristics like cost-effectiveness and accuracy. The RCM methodology is based on equipment reliability, which is estimated assuming that all failure modes are independent. However, in some cases, this assumption is not always satisfied. This paper seeks to show the effect of considering dependence for different failure modes; a comparison between traditional reliability models and copulas model is made. An injection molding process is considered for application in order to assess the proposed model and define a maintenance activities’ program. Including dependence between failure modes in reliability estimation allowed 75% savings in the annual maintenance costs, which represent a direct benefit for company.

Keywords

Reliability-centered maintenance Copulas Small size sample Plastic injection molding 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Deshpande VS, Mahant PM (2013) Application of reliability centered maintenance methodology to develop maintenance program for a heavy duty hydraulic stretching machine. Aust J Multi-Discipl Eng 9(2):177–184Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    McKenna T, Oliverson R (1997) Glossary of reliability and maintenance terms. Gulf Professional PublishingGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Moubray J (1997) Reliability-centered maintenance. Industrial Press Inc.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Yildirim MB, Nezami FG (2014) Integrated maintenance and production planning with energy consumption and minimal repair. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 74(9–12):1419–1430.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-5834-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Greenough RM, Grubic T (2011) Modelling condition-based maintenance to deliver a service to machine tool users. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 52(9):1117–1132.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-010-2760-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kandukuri ST, Robbersmyr KG, Karimi HR (2016) Towards farm-level health management of offshore wind farms for maintenance improvements. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 83(9–12):1557–1567.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7616-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Niu G, Yang BS, Pecht M (2010) Development of an optimized condition-based maintenance system by data fusion and reliability-centered maintenance. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 95(7):786–796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Johnston DC (2002) Plausible reasoning theory in reliability-centered maintenance analysis. In Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, 2002. Proceedings. Annual. IEEE, pp 367-371Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nahmias S, Cheng Y (1993) Production and operations analysis, vol 2. Irwin, HomewoodGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mann NR, Schafer RE, Singpurwalla ND (1997) Methods for statistical analysis of reliability and life data.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Modarres M, Kaminskiy MP, Krivtsov V (2009) Reliability engineering and risk analysis: a practical guide. CRC pressGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wang KH, Ke JB, Lee WC (2007) Reliability and sensitivity analysis of a repairable system with warm standbys and R unreliable service stations. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 31(11):1223–1232.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-005-0298-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dodson B, Nolan D (1999) Reliability engineering handbook. Marcel Dekker, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gertsbakh I (2002) Reliability theory with applications to preventive maintenance. IIE Transactions 34(12):1111–1114Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dodson B (1994) Weibull analysis. Asq PressGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kotz K, Nadarajah S (2000) Extreme value distributions: Theory and applications. Imperial college press, LondonCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nelsen RB (2007) An introduction to copulas. Springer Science & Business MediaGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Antonitsin AP (2012) Statistical methods in reliability testingGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Abernethy RB (2008) The new Weibull handbook: Reliability & statistical analysis for predicting life, safety, survivability, risk, cost and warranty claims. R.B. Abernethy, North Palm BeachGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Efron B, Tibshirani RJ (1994) An introduction to the bootstrap. CRC pressGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Krishnamoorthy K, Peng J (2011) Improved closed-form prediction intervals for binomial and Poisson distributions. J Stat Plan Inf 141(5):1709–1718.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspi.2010.11.021 MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marco A. Fuentes-Huerta
    • 1
  • David S. González-González
    • 1
    • 2
  • Mario Cantú-Sifuentes
    • 3
  • Rolando J. Praga-Alejo
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.COMIMSA (Corporación Mexicana de Investigación en Materiales)SaltilloMexico
  2. 2.Facultad de SistemasUniversidad Autónoma de Coahuila Ciudad UniversitariaArteagaMexico
  3. 3.Universidad Autónoma Agraria Antonio NarroSaltilloMexico

Personalised recommendations