Effects of material properties on warpage in fused deposition modeling parts
Fused deposition modeling (FDM) offers many advantages over conventional manufacturing methods, but it is limited by the number of materials available. Extending FDM technology to semicrystalline polymers has been challenging due to the crystallization that occurs during cooling which results in FDM part warpage. Previous work used process simulation models to study the effects of material parameters and FDM process variables on the part warpage seen using polypropylene (PP). In this work, the process simulation models were adapted to investigate warpage of FDM parts made with a high-performance semicrystalline polymer, polyphenylene sulfide (PPS). Material parameters in the PPS process simulation models were individually changed to the PP values to investigate which material parameters cause PP to exhibit higher warpage than PPS. Material parameters of interest included coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE), thermal conductivity, heat capacity, and Young’s modulus. Additional material parameters based on material property modification through the addition of fillers were investigated in order to establish the relationship between material parameters and warpage values. The simulation models suggested that the CTE has the largest impact on FDM part warpage. Decreasing the CTE in the simulation model resulted in a decrease in the FDM part warpage by the same factor.
KeywordsAdditive manufacturing Fused deposition modeling Polyphenylene sulfide Coefficient of thermal expansion Shrinkage
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
The authors gratefully acknowledge funding from Kimberly-Clark Corporation and donation of PPS from Technical Polymers for the capillary rheology experiments.
This study was funded by Kimberly-Clark Corporation.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 6.Ziemian C, Sharma M, Ziemian S (2012) Anisotropic mechanical properties of ABS parts fabricated by fused deposition modelling. In: Gokcek M (ed) Mechanical Engineering. INTECH. https://doi.org/10.5772/34233
- 7.Rubinstein M, Colby RH (2003) Polymer physics. Oxford, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 8.Painter PC, Coleman MM (2008) Essentials of polymer science and engineering. DEStech Publications, Inc, LancasterGoogle Scholar
- 21.DeNardo NM (2016) Additive manufacturing of carbon fiber-reinforced thermoplastic composites. Dissertation, Purdue UniversityGoogle Scholar
- 23.Watanabe N, Shofner M, Treat N, Rosen D (2016) A model for residual stress and part warpage prediction in material extrusion with application to polypropylene. In: 2016 Annual International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, AustinGoogle Scholar
- 28.Dynisco (2016) Capillary rheometer (LCR7000 series). http://wwwdyniscocom/capillary-rheometer--lcr-7000-series. Accessed 8 May 2017
- 29.Quadrantplasics.com Techtron PPS - Quadrant. http://www.quadrantplastics.com/na-en/products/engineering-plastics/advanced-325-425-f/techtron-R-pps.html. Accessed 8 May 2017
- 30.Critical surface tension and contact angle with water for various polymers. https://www.accudynetest.com/polytable_03.html. Accessed 14 Oct 2017
- 31.HYREL system 30. http://www.hyrel3d.com/. Accessed 8 May 2017
- 32.Repetier homepage. http://www.repetier.com/. Accessed 8 May 2017
- 33.Hodgson G Slic3r manual. http//www.manual.slic3r.org/intro/overview. Accessed 8 May 2017
- 34.Tsou A, Waddell W (2002) Fillers. Encyclopedia of polymer science and technology. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 37.Han ZD, Fina A (2011) Thermal conductivity of carbon nanotubes and their polymer nanocomposites: a review. Prog Polym Sci 36(7):914–944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2010.11.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar