Forming behavior and microstructural evolution during single point incremental forming process of AA-6061 aluminum alloy sheet
- 63 Downloads
AA-6061 aluminum alloy is extensively used in automobile and aerospace industries due to its high strength-to-weight ratio. However, this material shows limited formability in age-hardened condition at room temperature. Therefore, a new forming method known as single point incremental forming (SPIF) to deform the sheet was adopted. The SPIF experiments and finite element method (FEM) simulation were performed to form the sheet into the desired conical shape. Digital image correlation (DIC) method was used to measure the major and minor strains post deformation experimentally, and results were compared with FEM results. Detailed microstructural study was performed to understand the deformation behavior of AA-6061 aluminum alloy sheets during SPIF. It is observed that plastic anisotropy has strong effect on microstructure and texture development in different directions of AA-6061 alloy sheet during SPIF. It is also observed that volume fraction of goss and S texture components remains stable, whereas volume fraction of cube and brass texture changes significantly.
KeywordsSingle point incremental forming Digital image correlation Finite element methods Deformation mechanism Microstructure Crystallographic texture
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support provided for this work by the National Centre for Aerospace Innovation and Research, IIT Bombay, Powai, Mumbai, India.
- 2.Davies ER (2008) Introduction to texture analysis. Handbook of Texture Analysis Imperial College PressGoogle Scholar
- 5.Raju P, Venkateswarlu G, Davidson MJ (2012) Formability studies on AA 6061 sheet metal for automotive body structures using deform-2D. Int J Adv Sci Tech Res 4:638–644Google Scholar
- 21.Bambach S, Hirt MG (2003) Modelling and experimental evaluation of the incremental CNC sheet metal forming process. In: Proceedings 7th COMPLASGoogle Scholar
- 22.Pandivelan C, Jeevanantham AK (2015) Formability evaluation of AA 6061 alloy sheets on single point incremental forming using CNC vertical milling Machin. J Mater Environ Sci 6:1343–1353Google Scholar
- 26.Skrotzki W, Hünsche I, Hüttenrauch J, Oertel CG, Brokmeier HG, Höppel HW, Topic I (2008) Texture and mechanical anisotropy of ultrafine-grained aluminum alloy AA6016 produced by accumulative roll bonding. Texture Stress Microstruct 2008:1–8Google Scholar
- 28.Dumoulin OGLS, Engler O (2012) Description of plastic anisotropy in AA6063-T6 using the crystal plasticity finite element method. Model Simul Mater Sci Eng 055008:1–20Google Scholar
- 30.ASTM E8 (2010) ASTM E8/E8M standard test methods for tension testing of metallic materials 1. Annu B ASTM Stand 4:1–27Google Scholar
- 31.Conshohocken W (1998) Standard test method for plastic strain ratio r for sheet metal 1. Methods 03:1–8Google Scholar
- 32.Bijker S, (2006) How to perform adequate optical strain measurements on a sheet metal truck bumper. Report MT06.56Google Scholar
- 38.Chakrabarty J (2006) Theory of plasticity: third edition. Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
- 41.Dieter GE (2014) Mechanical metallurgy. CreateSpace Independent Publishing PlatformGoogle Scholar
- 42.Verlinden B, Driver J, Samajdar I, Doherty RD (2014) Thermo-mechanical processing of metallic materials. Pergamon materials series. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
- 44.Wen XY, Long ZD, Yin WM, Zhai T, Li Z, Das SK (2006) Texture evolution in continuous casting AA5052 aluminum alloy hot band during equi-biaxial stretching. TMS 99–107Google Scholar