Assessment of the effect of cutting parameters on roughness in flexible honed cylinders

  • Leandro Carvalho Pereira
  • Rosenda Valdés Arencibia
  • Cristiano Rafael Schramm
  • Luciano José Arantes


This study aims to investigate the effect of the three cutting parameters (rotation, feed rate, and number of tool strokes) on the values of roughness (Rk, Rpk, Rvk, Mr1, Mr2, Rp/Rt ratio, and Vo) in flexible honed crankcase cylinder of hermetic compressors. The study was based on a full factorial design 2 × 2 × 3, where the rotation and the feed rate were investigated in two levels and the number of tool strokes in three levels. The cylinders were initially honed using a multi-spindle honing machine, Gehring model. A set of three honing tools was used each with two strokes, the first for roughing (120 mesh), the second for semi-finishing (270 mesh), and the third for finishing (600 mesh). For conventional honing (CH), the depth of the cut and the feed rate were kept constant. The flexible honing process was carried out after conventional honing (C+FH) in a CNC milling machine using a Silicon Carbide flex hone tool 800 mesh and 24.2 mm nominal diameter considering 12 different cutting conditions. An electromechanical surface roughness tester was used to carry out roughness measurements. The measurement uncertainty was assessed following the recommendations of the GUM-JCGM 101. The analysis of variance (ANOVA) technique was applied, and it was observed that the number of the tool strokes was the factor that contributed the most to the improvement of the surface finish of the cylinders.


Honing Silicon carbide ANOVA 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.



The authors would like to thank the Brazilian financing agencies Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES), Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), and Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG) for supporting the development of this research and EMBRACO for providing the workpieces.


  1. 1.
    Miller ML (1993) Flexible honing. A study of cylinder wall microstructure. Proceedings understanding. Basics honing, SME - Soc Mech Eng 9Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barton G, Haasis K (1993) Characteristics of honing in: understanding the basics of honing. Soc Manuf Eng 37Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    BRM. Brush Research Manufacturing (2017) The flex-hone tool. Flex-Hone® for cylinder surface finishing, Cross hole deburring, deglazing, edge blending and cleaning.
  4. 4.
    Etsion I (2005) State of the art in laser surface texturing. ASME J Tribol 127:248–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yussefian NZ, Koshy P (2013) Application of foil electrodes for electro-erosion edge honing of complex-shaped carbide inserts. J Mater Process Technol 213:434–443. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Buj Corral I, Calvet JV, Salcedo MC (2010) Use of roughness probability parameters to quantify the material removed in plateau-honing. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 50:621–629. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pawlus P, Cieslak T, Mathia T (2009) The study of cylinder liner plateau honing process. J Mater Process Technol 209:6078–6086. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Haasis G, Weigmann UP (1999) New honing technique reduces oil consumption. Ind Diam Rev 3:205–211Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Malburg MC, Raja J (1993) Characterization of surface texture generated by plateau-honing process. CIRP Ann 42:637–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dimkovski Z, Cabanettes F, Lofgren H et al (2012) Optimization of cylinder liner surface finish by slide honing. Proc Inst Mech Eng B J Eng Manuf 226:575–584. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Anderberg C, Pawlus P, Rosén B-G, Thomas TR (2009) Alternative descriptions of roughness for cylinder liner production. J Mater Process Technol 209:1936–1942. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dynarowski R, Nowicki B (2001) Investigation on non-conventional honing of sculptured surfaces for parts made of alloy steel. J Mater Process Technol 109:270–276. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Buj-Corral I, Vivancos-Calvet J (2011) Roughness variability in the honing process of steel cylinders with CBN metal bonded tools. Precis Eng 35:289–293. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Vrac D, Sidjanin L, Balos S, Kovac P (2014) The influence of tool kinematics on surface texture, productivity, power and torque of normal honing. Ind Lubr Tribol 66:215–222. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Buj-Corral I, Vivancos-Calvet J, Coba-Salcedo M (2014) Modelling of surface finish and material removal rate in rough honing. Precis Eng 38:100–108. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Shaikh JH, Jain NK (2014) Modeling of material removal rate and surface roughness in finishing of bevel gears by electrochemical honing process. J Mater Process Technol 214:200–209. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Saljé E, von See M (1987) Process-optimization in honing. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 36:235–239. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    ISO (1996) ISO 13565-2:1996 Geometrical product specifications (GPS)—surface texture: profile method; surfaces having stratified functional properties—part 2: height characterization using the linear material ratio curve. 6Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Arantes LJ, Fernandes KA, Schramm CR et al (2017) The roughness characterization in cylinders obtained by conventional and flexible honing processes. Int J Adv Manuf Technol:1–14.
  20. 20.
    Grabón W, Pawlus P (2016) Distinguishing the plateau and valley components of profiles from various types of two-process textures. Metrol Meas Syst 23:593–602. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Clark JR, Grant MB (1992) The effect of surface finish on component performance. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 32:37–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zipin RB (1990) Analysis of the surface roughness parameter proposals. Precis Eng 12:106–108. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Pawlus P (1994) Study on the functional properties of honed cylinders surface during running-in. Wear 176:247–254. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Pawlus P (1997) Change of cylinder surface topography in the initial stage of engine life. Wear 209:69–83. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bipm, Iec, Ifcc et al (2008) Evaluation of measurement data—supplement 1 to the “guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement”—propagation of distributions using a Monte Carlo method. Eval JCGM 101(2):90Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    ISO (2013) ISO 12085:1996 - Geometrical product specifications (GPS)—surface texture: profile method—motif parameters. 17Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Leach RK (2014) The measurement of surface texture using stylus instruments. Meas Good Pract Guid No 37 100Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Haitjema H (1998) Uncertainty analysis of roughness standard calibration using stylus instruments. Precis Eng 22:110–119. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Paulo Davim J (2012) Computacional methods for optimizing manufacturing technology. Models and techniques, 1st edn. IGI Publishing Hershey, PACrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Stout K, Sullivan P, Dong W, et al (1993) The development of methods for the characterisation of roughness in three dimensionsGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Schmitt C, Bähre D (2013) An approach to the calculation of process forces during the precision honing of small bores. Procedia CIRP 7:282–287. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Leandro Carvalho Pereira
    • 1
  • Rosenda Valdés Arencibia
    • 1
  • Cristiano Rafael Schramm
    • 2
  • Luciano José Arantes
    • 1
  1. 1.Federal University of UberlândiaUberlândiaBrazil
  2. 2.Whirlpool S.A–EmbracoJoinvilleBrazil

Personalised recommendations