Skip to main content

A method for optimal reduction of locating error with the minimum adjustments of locators based on the geometric capability ratio of process

Abstract

Imprecise productions with low quality are produced by the incapable manufacturing processes. Prediction of the process capability in the design stage plays a key role to improve the product quality. In this paper, a new method is proposed to optimally reduce the locating error by allocating the minimum adjustments of locators. To quantify the precision of the manufacturing process, a proper tool that is called the geometric capability ratio (GCR) of the manufacturing process is introduced. First, based on a part fixture model, the relationship between the locating error and its sources is developed. Then, using the proposed geometric capability ratio, the manufacturing process capability is evaluated to achieve a specific desired level. If the process is incapable, the locating error should be essentially reduced. To improve the precision and accuracy of the final product, the error reduction procedure is developed as an optimal design problem. The formulated optimization problem can be efficiently solved by an evolutionary algorithm for constrained global optimization such as genetic algorithm method. The method is developed for the uncertainty analysis based on three approaches: the direct method, the worst case, and the statistical approaches. The proposed method is illustrated using a case study, and the computational results are compared to the obtained results from Monte Carlo and CAD simulations.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. 1.

    Nee AYC, Tao ZJ, Kumar A (2004) An advanced treatise on fixture design and planning. World Scientific, USA

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Kane VE (1986) Process capability indices. J Qual Technol 18(1):41–52

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Asada H, By AB (1985) Kinematic analysis of workpart fixturing for flexible assembly with automatically reconfigurable fixtures. IEEE Trans Robot Autom 1(1):86–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Rong Y, Bai Y (1996) Machining accuracy analysis for computer-aided fixture design verification. J Manuf Sci Eng 118:289–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Choudhuri SA, DeMeter EC (1996) Tolerance analysis of machining fixture locators. J Manuf Sci Eng 121(2):273–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Sangnui S, Peters F (2001) The impact of surface error on the location and orientation of a cylindrical workpiece in a fixture. J Manuf Sci Eng Trans ASME 123:325–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Kang Y, Rong Y, Yang JC (2003) Computer-aided fixture design verification. Part 2. tolerance analysis. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 21:836–841

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Xiong CH, Li YF, Rong Y, Xiong YL (2002) Qualitative analysis and quantitative evaluation of fixturing. Rob Comput Integr Manuf 18(5):335–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Xiong CH, Ding H, Xiong YL (2003) Fundamentals of robotic grasping and fixturing, series on manufacturing systems and technology, vol 3. World Scientific Publishing, USA

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Deng H, Melkote SN (2006) Determination of minimum clamping forces for dynamically stable fixturing. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 46(7–8):847–857

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Qin GH, Zhang WH, Wan M (2006) A mathematical approach to analysis and optimal design of a fixture locating scheme. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 29:349–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Chaiprapat S (2008) Rujikietgumjorn S (2008) Modeling of positional variability of a fixture workpiece due to locating errors. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 36:724–731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Abe G, Aritoshi M, Tomita T, Shirase K (2008) Machining error compensation based on 3D surface model modified by measured accuracy. J Adv Mech Des Syst Manuf Spec Issue Adva Manuf Technol 2(4):792–799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Armillotta A, Moroni G, Polini W, Semeraro Q (2010) A unified approach to kinematic and tolerance analysis of locating fixtures. J Comput Inf Sci Eng 10(021009):1–11

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Jeang A (2010) Optimal process capability analysis for process design. Int J Prod Res 48(4):957–989

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Vishnupriyan S, Majumder MC, Ramachandran KP (2011) Optimal fixture parameters considering locator errors. Int J Prod Res 49(21):6343–6341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Chen KS, Huang ML, Li RK (2001) Process capability analysis for an entire product. Int J Prod Res 39(17):4077–4087

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Zhu SW, Ding GF, Ma SW, Yan KY, Qin SF (2013) Workpiece locating error prediction and compensation in fixtures. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 67:1423–1432 2013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Khodaygan S (2013) A method for locator errors compensation in the fixture-workpiece system. SAE Int J Mater Manf 6(3):494–501. https://doi.org/10.4271/2013-01-1382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Khodaygan S (2014) Manufacturing error compensation based on cutting tool location correction in machining processes. Int J Comput Integr Manuf 27(11):969–978

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Khodaygan S, Movahhedy MR (2014) Functional process capability analysis in mechanical systems. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 73(5–8):899–912

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Greenwood WH, Chase KW (1988) Worst case tolerance analysis with nonlinear problems. J Eng Ind Trans ASME 110:232–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Greenwood WH, Chase KW (1990) Root sum squares tolerance analysis with nonlinear problems. J Eng Ind Trans ASME 112:382–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Sobol IM, (1994) A primer for the Monte Carlo method, First edition. CRC Press, Boca Raton, p 128

  25. 25.

    Relyea DB, (2011) The Practical Application of the Process Capability Study: Evolving From Product Control to Process Control, First edition. CRC Press, Hoboken, p 163

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Khodaygan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khodaygan, S. A method for optimal reduction of locating error with the minimum adjustments of locators based on the geometric capability ratio of process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 94, 3963–3978 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-1054-y

Download citation

Keywords

  • Geometric process capability
  • Error reduction
  • Uncertainty analysis
  • Locating error
  • Optimal design