Advertisement

Experimental and numerical study of chip formation in orthogonal cutting of Ti-5553 alloy: the influence of cryogenic, MQL, and high pressure coolant supply

  • Yusuf Kaynak
  • Armin Gharibi
  • Melih Ozkutuk
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Abstract

This study presents investigation of chip formation process of Ti-5553 alloy that is a next generation near beta titanium alloy and has potential to be replaced with commonly used Ti-6Al-4V due to its superior properties such as high corrosion and fatigue resistance. Experimental part of this study includes orthogonal cutting process of Ti-5553 alloy under dry, cryogenic, minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) and high pressure coolant (HPC) conditions. Various cutting speeds were taken into account to observe chip-tool contact length, forces, temperature, chip morphology resulting from various machining conditions. Experimental study demonstrates that HPC and cryogenic help to improve chip formation process of this alloy. By implementing Johnson–Cook model, orthogonal cutting process of this alloy in dry and cryogenic conditions is simulated utilizing Deform 2D commercial software. Predicted force, temperature, and chip morphology show good agreement with experimentally measured data.

Keywords

Ti-5553 alloy Orthogonal cutting Cooling/lubrication Cutting forces Finite element method 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Leyens C, Peters M (2003) Titanium and titanium alloys: fundamentals and applications. Weinheim John Wiley & SonsGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kar SK, Ghosh A, Fulzele N, Bhattacharjee A (2013) Quantitative microstructural characterization of a near beta Ti alloy, Ti-5553 under different processing conditions. Mater Charact 81:37–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hua K, Xue X, Kou H, Fan J, Tang B, Li J (2014) Characterization of hot deformation microstructure of a near beta titanium alloy Ti-5553. J Alloys Compd 615:531–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Arrazola P-J, Garay A, Iriarte L-M, Armendia M, Marya S, Le Maitre F (2009) Machinability of titanium alloys (Ti6Al4V and Ti555. 3). J Mater Process Technol 209(5):2223–2230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ugarte A, M'Saoubi R, Garay A, Arrazola P (2012) Machining behaviour of Ti-6Al-4V and Ti-5553 All0oys in interrupted cutting with PVD coated cemented carbide. Procedia CIRP 1:202–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wagner V, Baili M, Dessein G, Lallement D (2010) Experimental characterization of behavior laws for titanium alloys: application to Ti5553. In: Key Engineering Materials. Trans Tech Publ 446:147-155. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.446.147
  7. 7.
    Wagner V, Baili M, Dessein G (2015) The relationship between the cutting speed, tool wear, and chip formation during Ti-5553 dry cutting. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 76(5–8):893–912CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Baili M, Wagner V, Dessein G,Sallaberry J, Lallement D (2011) An experimental investigation of hot machining with induction to improve Ti-5553 machinability. In: Applied mechanics and Materials. Trans Tech Publ 62:67-76. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.62.67
  9. 9.
    Germain G, Morel A, Braham-Bouchnak T (2013) Identification of material constitutive laws representative of machining conditions for two titanium alloys: Ti6Al4V and Ti555-3. J Eng Mater Technol 135(3):031002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sun Y, Huang B, Puleo D, Jawahir I (2015) Enhanced machinability of Ti-5553 alloy from cryogenic machining: comparison with MQL and flood-cooled machining and modeling. Procedia CIRP 31:477–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zheng Y, Williams RE, Sosa JM, Wang Y, Banerjee R, Fraser HL (2016) The role of the ω phase on the non-classical precipitation of the α phase in metastable β-titanium alloys. Scr Mater 111:81–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wang S, Nates R, Pasang T, Ramezani M ( 2015) Modelling of gas tungsten arc welding pool under Marangoni convection. Univ J Mech Eng.3(5):185-201. doi: 10.13189/ujme.2015.030504
  13. 13.
    Ezugwu E (2005) Key improvements in the machining of difficult-to-cut aerospace superalloys. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 45(12):1353–1367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Matsumoto H, Kitamura M, Li Y, Koizumi Y, Chiba A (2014) Hot forging characteristic of Ti–5Al–5V–5Mo–3Cr alloy with single metastable β microstructure. Mater Sci Eng A 611:337–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Komanduri R (1982) Some clarifications on the mechanics of chip formation when machining titanium alloys. Wear 76(1):15–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Özel T, Zeren E (2007) Finite element modeling the influence of edge roundness on the stress and temperature fields induced by high-speed machining. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 35(3–4):255–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sima M, Özel T (2010) Modified material constitutive models for serrated chip formation simulations and experimental validation in machining of titanium alloy Ti–6Al–4V. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 50(11):943–960CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pu Z, Umbrello D, Dillon O, Lu T, Puleo D, Jawahir I (2014) Finite element modeling of microstructural changes in dry and cryogenic machining of AZ31B magnesium alloy. J Manuf Process 16(2):335–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Manual D (2015) User manual SFTC- Deform V11. Scientific Forming Technologies Corporation Ed, ColumbusGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Johnson GR, Cook WH (1983) A constitutive model and data for metals subjected to large strains, high strain rates and high temperatures. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Ballistics, vol 1983. The Hague, The Netherlands, pp 541–547Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nemat-Nasser S, Guo W-G, Nesterenko VF, Indrakanti S, Gu Y-B (2001) Dynamic response of conventional and hot isostatically pressed Ti–6Al–4V alloys: experiments and modeling. Mech Mater 33(8):425–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Khan AS, Suh YS, Kazmi R (2004) Quasi-static and dynamic loading responses and constitutive modeling of titanium alloys. Int J Plast 20(12):2233–2248CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Yen Y-C, Jain A, Chigurupati P, Wu W-T, Altan T (2004) Computer simulation of orthogonal cutting using a tool with multiple coatings. Mach Sci Technol 8(2):305–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Cockcroft M, Latham D (1968) Ductility and the workability of metals. J Inst Met 96(1):33–39Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Loewen E, Shaw M (1954) On the analysis of cutting tool temperatures. Trans ASME 76(2):217–225Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of TechnologyMarmara UniversityIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations