Improvement of overall equipment efficiency of ring frame through total productive maintenance: a textile case

Abstract

This paper focuses on the application of Kaizen, one of the pillars of total productive maintenance (TPM), for improvement of overall equipment efficiency (OEE) of a ring frame section in a spinning plant. The ring frame is considered as one of the critical sections since rope-like fiber strands become a fine yarn through a high amount of attenuation. Here, Kaizen was applied in the ring frame section to enhance overall performance and increase the productivity. Six major stoppage losses, namely breakdown or equipment failure, setup and adjustment, idling and minor stoppage, reduced speed, defects in the process, and reduced yield in the first place, were examined with the help of Pareto analysis, why why because logical analysis (WWBLA), and cause-and-effect analysis. A well-organized training program was conducted to make the operators educated about these losses and possible ways of improving the condition. Because of Kaizen, losses in the ring frame section were reduced significantly, and the OEE of the equipment was increased from 75.09 to 86.02%, productivity was improved by 23.93%, and production of defective items was reduced by 49.50%. The findings from this work revealed the benefit of application of TPM in real-world manufacturing environments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. 1.

    Ahmed M, Ahmad N (2011) An application of Pareto analysis and cause-and-effect diagram (CED) for minimizing rejection of raw materials in lamp production process. Manag Sci Eng 5(3):87–95

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Ahmed T, Ali SM, Allama MM, Parvez MS (2010) A total productive maintenance (TPM) approach to improve production efficiency and development of loss structure in a pharmaceutical industry. Glob J Manag Bus Res 10(2):186–190

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Ahmed S, Syduzzaman M, Mahmud MS, Ashique SM, Rahman MM (2015) Comparative study on ring, rotor and air-jet spun yarn. Eur Sci J 11(3):411–424

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Ahuja IPS, Kumar P (2009) A case study of total productive maintenance implementation at precision tube mills. J Qual Maint Eng 15(3):241–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Al-Hassan K, Chan JFL, Metcalfe AV (2000) The role of total productive maintenance in business excellence. Total Qual Manag 11(4–6)

  6. 6.

    Almeanazel OTR (2010) Total productive maintenance review and overall equipment effectiveness measurement. Jordan J Mech Indust Eng 4(4):517–522

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Al-Najjar B, Hansson MO, Sunnegårdh P (2004) Benchmarking of maintenance performance: a case study in two manufacturers of furniture. IMA J Manag Math 15(3):253–270

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Amer Y, Luong L, Lee SH (2010) Case study: optimizing order fulfillment in a global retail supply chain. Int J Prod Econ 127(2):278–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Anjukumar VN, Gandhi OP (2013) Evaluation of green maintenance initiatives in design and development of mechanical systems using an integrated approach. J Clean Prod 51:34–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Annapoorani SJ (2016) Social sustainability in textile industry. Textile Science and Clothing Technology, Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd., 57–78

  11. 11.

    Aziz I, Karim S, Hossain M (2012) Effective implementation of total productive maintenance and impacts on breakdown time and repair & maintenance—a case study of a printing industry in Bangladesh. In: Proceedings of the Global Engineering, Science and Technology Conference 2012. Dhaka, Bangladesh, pp 1–9

  12. 12.

    Azizi A (2015) Evaluation improvement of production productivity performance using statistical process control, overall equipment efficiency, and autonomous maintenance. Procedia Manuf 2:186–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Bamford D, Greatbanks RW (2005) The use of quality management tools and techniques: a study of application in everyday situations. Int J Qual Reliab Manag 22(4):376–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Benjamin SJ, Marathamuthu MS, Murugaiah U (2015) The use of 5-WHYs technique to eliminate OEE’s speed loss in a manufacturing firm. J Qual Maint Eng 21(4):29–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Bhadury B (2000) Management of productivity through TPM. Productivity 41(2):240–251

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Bhoi JA, Desai DA, Patel RM (2014) The concept & methodology of Kaizen. Int J Eng Dev Res 2(1):812–820

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Braglia M, Frosolini M, Gallo M (2016) SMED enhanced with 5-whys analysis to improve set-upreduction programs: the SWAN approach. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 1–11

  18. 18.

    Cakmakci M, Karasu MK (2007) Set-up time reduction process and integrated predetermined time system MTM-UAS: a study of application in a large size company of automobile industry. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 33(3):334–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Carannante T, Haigh RH, Morris DS (1996) Implementing total productive maintenance: a comparative study of the UK and Japanese foundry industries. Total Qual Manag 7(6):605–611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Chan FTS, Lau HCW, Ip RWL, Chan HK, Kong S (2005) Implementation of total productive maintenance: a case study. Int J Prod Econ 95(1):71–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Chand G, Shirvani B (2000) Implementation of TPM in cellular manufacture. J Mater Process Technol 103(1):149–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Chlebus E, Helman J, Olejarczyk M, Rosienkiewicz M (2015) A new approach on implementing TPM in a mine—a case study. Arch Civ Mech Eng 15:873–884

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Eti MC, Ogaji SOT, Probert SD (2004) Implementing total productive maintenance in Nigerian manufacturing industries. Appl Energy 79(4):385–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Ezey MD-E (2013) What we really need is TPQM. Int J Prod Econ 52(1–2):5–13

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Farris JA, Van Aken EM, Doolen TL, Worley J (2009) Critical success factors for human resource outcomes in Kaizen events: an empirical study. Int J Prod Econ 117(1):42–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Fernandez-Stark K, Frederick S, Gereffi G (2011) The apparel global value chain-economic upgrading and workforce development. Center on Globalization, Governance & Competitiveness, Duke University

  27. 27.

    Fore S, Zuze L (2010) Improvement of overall equipment effectiveness through total productive maintenance. Int Sci Index 4(1):320–328

    Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    García JL, Rivera DG, Iniesta AA (2013) Critical success factors for Kaizen implementation in manufacturing industries in Mexico. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 68(1):537–545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    García JL, Maldonado AA, Alvarado A, River DG (2014) Human critical success factors for Kaizen and its impacts in industrial performance. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 70(9):2187–2198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Gereffi G, Frederick S (2010) The global apparel value chain, trade and the crisis: challenges and opportunities for developing countries. Global value chains in a postcrisis world: a development perspective. World Bank Press, Washington, pp 157–208

    Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Ghalayini AM, Noble JS (1996) The changing basis of performance measurement. Int J Oper Prod Manag 16(8):63–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Glover WJ, Farris JA, Van Aken EM, Doolen TL (2011) Critical success factors for the sustainability of Kaizen event human resource outcomes: an empirical study. Int J Prod Econ 132(2):197–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Gosavi A (2006) A risk-sensitive approach to total productive maintenance. Automatica 42(8):1321–1330

    MathSciNet  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Graisa M, Al-Habaibeh A (2011) An investigation into current ptoduction challenges facing the Libyan cement industry and the need for innovative total productive maintenance (TPM) strategy. J Manuf Technol Manag 22(4):541–558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Grip AD, Sauermann J (2013) The effect of training on productivity: the transfer of on-the-job training from the perspective of economics. Educ Res Rev 8:28–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Gunasekaran A, Korukonda AR, Virtanen I, Yli-Olli P (1994) Improving productivity and quality in manufacturing organisations. Int J Prod Econ 36(2):169–183

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Gupta N (2013) Analysis on the defects in yarn manufacturing process & its prevention in textile industry. Int J Eng Invent 2(7):45–67

    Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Habib J, Kang W (2008) Implementation of total productive maintenance on Haldex assembly line. Department of Production Engineering, Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden

    Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Hasin AA (2011) Quality control management. Bangladesh Business Solutions, Dhaka

    Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Herron C, Braiden PM (2006) A methodology for developing sustainable quantifiable productivity improvement in manufacturing companies. Int J Prod Econ 104(1):143–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Hicks C, McGovern T, Prior G, Smith I (2015) Applying lean principles to the design of healthcare facilities. Int J Prod Econ 170:677–686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Hossen J, Ahmad N, Ali, SM (2017) An application of Pareto analysis and cause-and-effect diagram (CED) to examine stoppage losses: a textile case from Bangladesh, J Text Inst, doi:10.1080/00405000.2017.1308786

  43. 43.

    Ishtiaque SM, Rengasamy RS, Ghosh A (2004) Optimization of ring frame process parameters for better yarn quality and production. Indian J Fiber Text Res 190–195

  44. 44.

    Islam MM, Khan AM, Islam MM (2013) Textile industries in Bangladesh and challenges of growth. Res J Eng Sci 2(2):31–37

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    James J, Ikuma LH, Nahmens I, Aghazadeh F (2014) The impact of Kaizen on safety in modular home manufacturing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 70(1):725–734

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Jasiulewicz-Kaczmarek M (2016) SWOT analysis for planned maintenance strategy—a case study. IFAC-PapersOnLine 49(12):674–679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Jonsson P, Lesshammar M (2005) Of manufacturing performance measurement systems—the role of OEE. Int J Oper Prod Manag 19(1):55–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Joshi A, Kadam P (2014) An application of Pareto analysis and cause effect diagram for minimization of defects in manual casting process. Int J Mech Prod Eng 2(2):31–35

    Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Juhl HJ, Sohal AS (1998) Quality management practices: a comparative study between East and West. Int J Qual Reliab Manag 15(8):812–826

    Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Karkoszka T, Honorowicz J (2009) Kaizen philosophy a manner of continuous improvement of processses and products. J Achiev Mater Manuf Eng 35(2):197–203

    Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Karupannan KP, Arularasu M, Devadasan SR (2016) Modern safety and training method implementation in different textile sectors. Int J Appl Bus Econ Res 14(14):799–816

    Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Karuppusami G, Gandhinathan R (2006) Pareto analysis of critical success factors of total quality management: a literature review and analysis. TQM Mag 18(4):372–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Keane J, Velde DW (2008) The role of textile and clothing industries in growth and development strategies. Technical paper. Overseas Development Institute, London

    Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Khare AR (1999) Elements of ring frame and doubling. Sai Book Centre, Mumbai

    Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Kiran M, Mathew C, Kuriakose J (2013) Root cause analysis for reducing breakdowns in a manufacturing industry. Int J Emerg Technol Adv Eng 3(1):211–216

    Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Klein W (1995) Manual of textile technology: a practical guide to ring spinning. Textile Institute, Manchester

    Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Klein W (2012) The technology of short staple spinning. The Textile Institute, Manchester

    Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Konecny PA, Thun JH (2011) Do it separately or simultaneously—an empirical analysis of a conjoint implementation of TQM and TPM on plant performance. Int J Prod Econ 133(2):496–507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Kumar V, Koehl L, Zeng X, Ekwall D (2016a) Coded yarn based tag for tracking textile supply chain. J Manuf Syst 42:124–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Kumar V, Koehl L, Zeng X (2016b) A fully yarn integrated tag for tracking the international textile supply chain. J Manuf Syst 40(1):76–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Lalkiya M, Kushwaha DK (2015) Optimizing and analyzing OEE through approach: a case study in cement industry. Int J Adv Eng Res Dev 2(5):807–811

    Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Lazim HM, Ramayah T (2010) Maintenance strategy in Malaysian manufacturing companies: a total productive maintenance (TPM) approach. Bus Strateg Ser 11(6):387–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Lazim HM, Salleh MN, Subramaniam C, Othman SN (2013) Total productive maintenance and manufacturing performance: does technical complexity in the production process matter? Int J Trade Econ Financ 4(6):380–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Lewandowski RG (2009) The ultimate strategic weapon. iUniverse, Inc., New York

    Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Ljungberg Õ (1998) Measurement of overall equipment effectiveness as a basis for TPM activities. Int J Oper Prod Manag 18(5):495–507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Lord PR (2003) Handbook of yarn production. J Text Inst. Woodhead and CRC, Cambridge, England.

  67. 67.

    Masri HA, Jaaron AAM (2017) Assessing green human resources management practices in Palestinian manufacturing context: an empirical study. J Clean Prod 143:474–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Masud A, Al-Khaled A, Jannat S, Khan ASA, Islam KJ (2007) Total productive maintenance in RMG sector a case: Burlingtons Limited, Bangladesh. J Mech Eng 37:62–66

    Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Muchiri P, Pintelon L (2008) Performance measurement using overall equipment effectiveness (OEE): literature review and practical application discussion. Int J Prod Res 46(13):3517–3535

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Murugan R, Vigneswaran C, Ghosh A (2011) Novel technique for improving yarn quality and reducing hairiness in conventional ring frame. Indian J Fiber Text Res 36:211–214

    Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Muthiah KMN, Huang SH, Mahadevan S (2008) Automating factory performance diagnostics using overall throughput effectiveness (OTE) metric. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 36(7):811–824

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Nakajima, S (1988) Introduction to TPM: Total Productive Maintenance (Preventative Maintenance Series). Productivity Press, Cambridge. MA.

  73. 73.

    Niijjaawan N, Niijjaawan R (2010) Modern approach to maintenance in spinning. Woodhead Publishing India PVT, LTD, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Ohunakin OS, Leramo RO (2012) TPM implementation in a beverage industry. J Eng Appl Sci 7(2):128–133

    Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Ozsoz E (2014) Exploitation or empowerment? The impact of textile and apparel manufacturing on the education of woman in developing countries(No. 5812). University Library of Munich, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Pan J, Chu C, Zhao X, Cui Y, Voituriez T (2008) Global cotton and textile product chains: identifying challenges and opportunities for China through a global commodity chain sustainability analysis. International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD), Manitoba

  77. 77.

    Parikh Y, Mahamuni P (2015) Total productive maintenance: need & framework. Int J Innov Res Adv Eng 2(2):126–130

    Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Paropate R, Sambhe R (2013) The implementation and evaluation of total productive maintenance—a case study of mid-sized Indian enterprise. Int J Appl Innov Eng Manag 2(10):120–125

    Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Patel VB, Thakkar HR (2014) Review study on improvement of overall equipment effectiveness through total productive maintenance. J Emerg Technol Innov Res 1(7):720–726

    Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Perry P, Wood S, Fernie J (2014) Corporate social responsibility in garment sourcing networks: factory management perspectives on ethical trade in Sri Lanka. J Bus Ethics 130(3):737–752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Proma FA, Yesmin T, Hasin MAA (2010) Measurement of TPM losses due to skill level difference of workers: case study of a pharmaceutical company. In: Proceedings of the 2010 International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management. Dhaka, Bangladesh, pp 316–320

  82. 82.

    Raheja K (2015) Methods training and development. Innov J Bus Manag 4(2):35–41

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Rajput HS, Jayaswal P (2012) A total productive maintenance (TPM) approach to improve overall equipment efficiency. Int J Mod Eng Res (IJMER) 2(6):4383–4386

    Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Rehman MA, Seth D, Shrivastava RL (2016) Impact of green manufacturing practices on organisational performance in Indian context: an empirical study. J Clean Prod 137:427–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    Schippers WAJ (2001) An integrated approach to process control. Int J Prod Econ 69(1):93–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    Sen A (2008) The US fashion industry: a supply chain review. Int J Prod Econ 114(2):571–593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    Son NT, Rashid SHA, Nguyen ND, Nakano M (2011) Using the value stream mapping and overall equipment effectiveness to improve productivity: a literature review. In: Proceedings of the 4th Regional Conference on Manufacturing. Yogyakarta, Indonesia, pp 1–9

  88. 88.

    Sun H, Yam R, Wai-Keung N (2003) The implementation and evaluation of total productive maintenance (TPM)—an action case study in a Hong Kong manufacturing company. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 22(3):224–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. 89.

    Swanson L (2001) Linking maintenance strategies to performance. Int J Prod Econ 70:237–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. 90.

    Tomar S, Bhuneriya AK (2016) Analysis of OEE for TPM implementation: case study. Int J Bus Quant Econ Appl Manag Res 2(8):89–99

    Google Scholar 

  91. 91.

    Tsarouhas P (2007) Implementation of total productive maintenance in food industry: a case study. J Qual Maint Eng 13(1):5–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. 92.

    Tsarouhas PH (2013) Evaluation of overall equipment effectiveness in the beverage industry: a case study. Int J Prod Res 51(2):515–523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. 93.

    Tu PYL, Yam R, Tse P, Sun AOW (2001) An integrated maintenance management system for an advanced manufacturing company. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 17:692–703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. 94.

    Ursprung R, Gray J (2010) Random safety auditing, root cause analysis, failure mode and effects analysis. Clin Perinatol 37(1):141–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. 95.

    Wakjira WW, Singh AP (2012) Total productive maintenance: a case study in manufacturing industry. Glob J Res Eng 12(1):24–32

    Google Scholar 

  96. 96.

    Walter D (2000) Competency-based on-the-job training for aviation maintenance and inspection—a human factors approach. Int J Ind Ergon 26(2):249–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. 97.

    Wudhikarn R (2010) Overall weighting equipment effectiveness. In: Proceedings of the 2010 I.E. IEEM. Chiang Mai, Thailand, pp 23–27

  98. 98.

    Wudikarn R (2011) Implementation of overall equipment effectiveness in wire mesh manufacturing. In: Proceedings of the 2011 I.E. IEEM. Chiang Mai, Thailand, pp 567–576

  99. 99.

    Yazdani AA, Tavakkoli-Moghaddam R (2012) Integration of the fish bone diagram, brainstorming, and AHP method for problem solving and decision making—a case study. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 63(5):651–657

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Syed Mithun Ali.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ahmad, N., Hossen, J. & Ali, S.M. Improvement of overall equipment efficiency of ring frame through total productive maintenance: a textile case. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 94, 239–256 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0783-2

Download citation

Keywords

  • Spinning
  • Ring frame
  • Total productive maintenance
  • Kaizen
  • Overall equipment efficiency (OEE)