Influence of aluminium sheet surface modification on the self-piercing riveting process and the joint static lap shear strength

Open Access
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • 280 Downloads

Abstract

Self-piercing riveting (SPR) has been widely used in automotive as one of the major joining technologies for aluminium structures due to its advantages over some of the more traditional joining technologies. Research has shown that friction is a very important factor that influences both the riveting process and the joint strength for SPR, but these influences have not been fully understood. In this paper, AA5754 sheets with different surface textures, such as original with solid wax, hot water washed, sandpaper ground and grit blasted, were used to study the influence of friction on therivet inserting process, joint features and static lap shear strength. The results of joint features and rivet setting displacement-force curve showed that hot water wash and sandpaper grinding on aluminium sheet did not have significant influence on the rivet inserting process and joint features; however, for joints with grit-blasted substrates, the rivet -setting forces were higher at the beginning, and a middle section of the curve and the joint features, such as interlocks and minimum remaining bottom material thickness (T min), were clearly altered. The lap shear tests showed that hot water washing can slightly increase the lap shear strength, sandpaper grinding increased the static lap shear strength further and grit blasting increased the static lap shear strength the most.

Keywords

Self-piercing riveting Friction Rivet setting process Lap shear strength Displacement-force curve 

References

  1. 1.
    Krause A, Chernenkoff R (1995) A comparative study of the fatigue behavior of spot welded and mechanically fastened aluminum joints. SAE Technical Paper 950710. doi: 10.4271/950710
  2. 2.
    Booth G, Olivier C, Westgate S, Liebrecht F et al (2000) Self-piercing riveted joints and resistance spot welded joints in steel and aluminium. SAE Technical Paper 2000-01-2681. doi: 10.4271/2000-01-2681
  3. 3.
    Sun X, Stephens EV, Khaleel MA (2007) Fatigue behaviors of self-piercing rivets joining similar and dissimilar sheet metals. Int J Fatigue 29(2):370–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Li D, Chrysanthou A, Patel I et al (2017) Self-piercing riveting—a review. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. doi: 10.1007/s00170-017-0156-x
  5. 5.
    Abe Y, Kato T, Mori K (2006) Joinability of aluminium alloy and mild steel sheets by self piercing rivet. J Mater Process Technol 177(1–3):417–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Li D, Han L, Thornton M, Shergold M (2010) An evaluation of quality and performance of self-piercing riveted high strength aluminium alloy AA6008 for automotive applications. SAE Technical Paper 2010-01-0223. doi: 10.4271/2010-01-0223
  7. 7.
    Hoang NH et al (2013) Failure of aluminium self-piercing rivets: an experimental and numerical study. Mater Des 49(0):323–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hoang NH et al (2010) Self-piercing riveting connections using aluminium rivets. Int J Solids Struct 47(3–4):427–439CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Esfahani M et al (2012) Effect of joining process on the coatings of self-piercing rivets. Adv Mater Res 488-489:1501–1505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Han L, Chrysanthou A, Young KW (2007) Mechanical behaviour of self-piercing riveted multi-layer joints under different specimen configurations. Mater Des 28(7):2024–2033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Porcaro R et al (2006) The behaviour of a self-piercing riveted connection under quasi-static loading conditions. Int J Solids Struct 43(17):5110–5131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Li D et al (2012) Influence of rivet to sheet edge distance on fatigue strength of self-piercing riveted aluminium joints. Mater Sci Eng A 558(0):242–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Li D et al (2014) The influence of fatigue on the stiffness and remaining static strength of self-piercing riveted aluminium joints. Mater Des 54(0):301–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Li D et al (2013) Influence of rivet tip geometry on the joint quality and mechanical strengths of self-piercing riveted aluminium joints. Mater Sci Forum 765:746–750CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Li D et al (2012) Influence of edge distance on quality and static behaviour of self-piercing riveted aluminium joints. Mater Des 34:22–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Han L, Chrysanthou A (2008) Evaluation of quality and behaviour of self-piercing riveted aluminium to high strength low alloy sheets with different surface coatings. Mater Des 29(2):458–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Han L, Young K, Hewitt R, Alkahari M et al (2006) Effect of sheet material coatings on quality and strength of self-piercing riveted joints. SAE Technical Paper 2006-01-0775. doi: 10.4271/2006-01-0775
  18. 18.
    Han L, Chrysanthou A, O’Sullivan JM (2006) Fretting behaviour of self-piercing riveted aluminium alloy joints under different interfacial conditions. Mater Des 27(3):200–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Maruyama T, Akagi K, Kobayashi T (2006) Effects of blasting parameters on removability of residual grit. J Therm Spray Technol 15(4):817–821CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.WMG, University of WarwickCoventryUK

Personalised recommendations