Tool overlap effect on redistributed residual stress and shape distortion produced by the machining of thin-walled aluminum parts

  • Xiaohui Jiang
  • Zhenya Zhang
  • Zishan Ding
  • Omar Fergani
  • Steven Y. Liang
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • 99 Downloads

Abstract

As the main factor, residual stress undoubtedly restricts the long-term stability of high-precision machining quality parts, arresting an extensive attention on studying its control method. Therefore, a model is meticulously proposed, along with the optimization method of the overlap rate of cutting tool path. In the roughing, the selection of a larger magnitude of overlap coefficient K is found to be necessary for the optimization of the surface machined residual stress, followed by an indispensable selection of smaller K values in the finishing. The shrinking overlap coefficient K echoes with the decreasing influence of the deformation affected by the residual stress distribution, inevitably accompanied by the lowering material removal rate. Based on all the optimization results, an aerospace thin-walled part is adopted in the application case to verify the proposed approach.

Keywords

Tool overlap Residual stress Distortion Milling Thin-walled parts 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Boiten RG, Cate WT (1952) A routine method for the measurement of residual stresses in plates. Appl Sci Res 3(5):317–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Toshiaki S, Sasahara H, Tsutsumi M (2004) Development of a new tool to generate compressive residual stress within a machined surface. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 44:1215–1221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Arunachalam RM, Mannan MA, Spowage AC (2004) Residual stress and surface roughness when facing age hardened Inconel 718 with CBN and ceramic cutting tools. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 44:879–887CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Navas VG, Gonzalo O, Bengoetxea I (2012) Effect of cutting parameters in the surface residual stresses generated by turning in AISI4340 steel. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 61:48–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sasahara H, Obikawa T, Shirakashi T (1996) FEM analysis of cutting sequence effect on mechanical characteristics in machined layer. J Mater Process Tech 62:448–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Liu CR, Guo Y (2000) Finite element analysis of the effect of sequential cuts and tool-chip friction on residual stresses in a machined layer. Int J Mech Sci 42:1069–1086CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nasr MNA (2015) Effects of sequential cuts on residual stresses when orthogonal cutting steel AISI 1045. Procedia CIRP 31:118–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wang ZJ, Chen WJ, Zhang YD, Chen ZT, Liu Q (2005) Study on the machining distortion of thin-walled part caused by redistribution of residual stress. Chin J Aeronaut 18(2):175–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Outeiroa JC, Umbrello D, Saoubi RM (2006) Experimental and numerical modelling of the residual stresses induced in orthogonal cutting of AISI 316L steel. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 46:1786–1794CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fergani O, Jiang XH, Shao YM, Welo T, Yang JG, Liang SY (2016) Prediction of residual stress regeneration in multi-pass milling. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 83:1153–1160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Robinson JS, Tanner DA, Truman CE, Wimpory RC (2011) Measurement and prediction of machining induced redistribution of residual stress in the aluminium alloy 7449. Exp Mech 51:981–993CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Shao YM, Fergani O, Li BZ, Liang SY (2016) Residual stress modeling in minimum quantity lubrication grinding. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 83:743–751CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zeng HH, Yan R, Peng FY, Zhou L, Deng B (2017) An investigation of residual stresses in micro-end-milling considering sequential cuts effect. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. doi: 10.1007/s00170-017-0088-5
  14. 14.
    Li JG, Wang SQ (2017) Distortion caused by residual stresses in machining aeronautical aluminum alloy parts—recent advances. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 89:997–1012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Treuting RG, Read WT (1951) A mechanical determination of biaxial residual stress in sheet materials. JAppl Phys 22(2):130–134CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sosa AD, Echeverria MD, Moncada OJ, Sikora JA (2007) Residual stresses, distortion and surface roughness produced by grinding thin wall ductile iron plates. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 47:229–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Omar F, Lazoglu I, Ali M, Mohamed EM, Liang SY (2014) Analytical modeling of residual stress and the induced deflection of a milled thin plate. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 75:455–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Omar F, Ali M, Lazoglu I, Yang JG, Liang SY (2014) Prediction of residual stress induced distortions in micro-milling of Al7050 thin plate. Appl Mech Mater 472:677–681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sasahara H (2005) The effect on fatigue life of residual stress and surface hardness resulting from different cutting conditions of 0.45%C steel. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 45:131–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Li BZ, Jiang XH, Yang JG, Liang SY (2015) Effects of depth of cut on the distortion and redistribution of residual stress during the milling of thin-walled part. J Mater Pro Technol 216:223–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Jing S, Liu CR (2004) The influence of material models on finite element simulation of machining. J Manuf Sci Eng 126:849–857CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bil H, Kılıc SE, Tekkaya AE (2004) A comparison of orthogonal cutting data from experiments with three different finite element models. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 44:933–944CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Third Wave Systems, I. (2010). AdvantEdge v5.6-014 Machining Simulation Software. Inc Minneapolis, MN.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Marusich TD, Ortiz M (1995) Modelling and simulation of high-speed machining. J Num Meth in Eng 38(21):3675–3694CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    T.D. Marusich, E. Askari. (2001). Modeling residual stress and workpiece quality in machined surfaces. Third Wave Systems, Inc Minneapolis.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xiaohui Jiang
    • 1
  • Zhenya Zhang
    • 1
  • Zishan Ding
    • 1
  • Omar Fergani
    • 2
  • Steven Y. Liang
    • 3
  1. 1.College of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of Shanghai for Science & TechnologyShanghaiPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.NTNU-Department of Engineering Design and MaterialNorwegian University of Science and TechnologyTrondheimNorway
  3. 3.The George W. Woodruff School of Mechanical EngineeringGeorgia Institute of TechnologyAtlantaUSA

Personalised recommendations