Influence of electrode temperature on electric erosion pit morphology during cool electrode EDM
The mechanism of material removal through cool electrode electrical discharge machining (EDM) was investigated in this study by using single pulse discharge method. The influence of electrode temperature on the electric erosion pit morphology on the surface of the electrode and workpiece was analyzed. Finite element simulation was conducted on the temperature field between the electrode and workpiece under different electrode temperatures, and the simulation results were verified through a single pulse experiment. Under the same single pulse discharge parameters, when the electrode temperature was −20, 20, and 60 °C, the electric erosion pit diameter on the electrode surface increased to 290, 350, and 403 μm, respectively; the change in electric erosion pit diameter on the workpiece surface was small, and the corresponding values were 690, 705, and 718 μm. However, the bulge of the electric erosion pit on the surface of the workpiece became increasingly obvious, and the surface became unsmooth. The results of the single pulse experiment and the finite element simulation were identical. A comparative experiment involving the machining of Ti-6Al-4V titanium alloy was conducted with cool electrode and conventional EDM. Electrode wear, surface roughness, and machining efficiency were analyzed. Compared with that in conventional EDM, electrode wear decreased by 24.5%, the material removal rate increased by 14.16%, and surface roughness decreased by 14.14% in cool electrode EDM. Reducing the electrode temperature changed the electric erosion pit morphology on the electrode and workpiece surface, reduced electrode wear, improved surface processing quality, and increased processing efficiency.
KeywordsEDM Cool electrode Electrode temperature Electrode wear Electric erosion pit
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Liu ZD, Gao CS (2011) Electrical discharge machining technology and application. National Defence Industry Press, Beijing, pp 13–26Google Scholar
- 8.Hui ZG, Liu ZD, Qiu MB, Wang XZ, Cao ZL (2014) Discharge characteristics of cool electrode in EDM based on monopulse discharge. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 75(5–8):731–738Google Scholar
- 11.Xie L, Tang GF (2008) The development and application of semiconductor refrigeration technology. Contamination Control & Air-conditioning Technology 1:68–71Google Scholar
- 12.Qiu MB, Huang YH, Liu ZD, Tian ZJ, Wang W (2009) Study on energy distribution at electrode of electrical discharge machining based on photon emission. Acta Opt Sin 09:2546–2551Google Scholar
- 13.Mingbo Q (2010) Research on electrical discharged machining of semiconductor crystal materials. Nanjing University of Aeronautics and AstronauticsGoogle Scholar
- 14.Li MH (1989) Theoretical basic of EDM. National Defense Industry Press, BeijingGoogle Scholar
- 16.Van Dijck FS, Dutré WL (2002) Heat conduction model for the calculation of the volume of molten metal in electric discharges. Food Science & Technology International Tokyo 7(6):559–584Google Scholar