Advertisement

Effects of variable blank holder forces and a controllable drawbead on the springback of shallow-drawn TA2M titanium alloy boxes

  • Chunjian Su
  • Ke Zhang
  • Shumei Lou
  • Tingting Xu
  • Qing Wang
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • 134 Downloads

Abstract

Springback, which occurs during stamping of shallow-drawn titanium alloy sheets, can negatively influence the stamping accuracy and reliability of follow-up assembly and welding of parts and restrict the application of titanium alloy sheets when high precision is a requirement. Therefore, accurate prediction and control of springback in titanium alloy sheets is an industrial problem that requires urgent attention. In this paper, a TA2M titanium alloy box formed via shallow drawing is used as the research object and springback control during stamping is attempted by varying the magnitude and mode of the blank holder force (VBHF) and height of a controllable drawbead. The influences of drawbead height, VBHF magnitude, and loading mode on the resulting sheet springback are determined by means of finite element simulation and experimentation to determine the best combination yielding the minimum springback. The results of this research provide a reliable reference for future efforts to form tough materials.

Keywords

Variable blank holder force Controllable drawbead Titanium alloy Shallow drawing forming Springback 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Tan FX, Li MZ, Cai ZY, Li XJ (2009) Formability analysis on the process of multi-point forming for titanium alloy retiary sheet. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 41(11):1059–1065Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Xiao R, Li XX, Lang LH, Song Q, Liu KN (2017) Forming limit in thermal cruciform biaxial tensile testing of titanium alloy. J Mater Process Technol 240:354–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Satoh J, Gotoh M, Maeda Y (2003) Stretch-drawing of titanium sheets. J Mater Process Technol 139(1–3):201–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Behera AK, Lu B, Ou H (2016) Characterization of shape and dimensional accuracy of incrementally formed titanium sheet parts with intermediate curvatures between two feature types. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 83(5):1099–1111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yang HC, Chen ZT, Zhou ZT (2015) Influence of cutting speed and tool wear on the surface integrity of the titanium alloy Ti-1023 during milling. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 78(5):1113–1126Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Marretta L, Lorenzo RD (2010) Influence of material properties variability on springback and thinning in sheet stamping processes: a stochastic analysis. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 51(1):117–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Vasudevan D, Srinivasan R, Padmanabhan P (2011) Effect of process parameters on springback behaviour during air bending of electrogalvanised steel sheet. J Zhejiang Univ Sci A 12(3):183–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Duchêne L, Guzmán CF, Behera AK, Duflou JR, Habraken AM (2013) Numerical simulation of a pyramid steel sheet formed by single point incremental forming using solid-shell finite elements. Key Eng Mater 549:180–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Behera AK, Gu J, Lauwers B, Duflou JR (2012) Influence of material properties on accuracy response surfaces in single point incremental forming. Key Eng Mater 504-506:919–924CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Essa K, Hartley P (2011) An assessment of various process strategies for improving precision in single point incremental forming. Int J Mater Form 4(4):401–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Su CJ, Zhao J, Guan YP (2010) Quantitative analysis of cap-shape bending and springback. J Mech Eng 46(8):42–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Duan YC, Guan YP, Zhao J (2012) Prediction and experiment verification of spring-back of tailor welded blanks air bending process. J Mech Eng 48(20):63–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    He DH, Li DS, Li XQ, Jin CH (2010) Optimization on springback reduction in cold stretch forming of titanium alloys aircraft skin. Trans Nonferrous Metals Soc China 12:2350–2357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wei Z, Zhang ZL, Dong XH (2006) Deep drawing of rectangle parts using variable blank holder force. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 29(9):885–889MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kitayama S, Natsume S, Yamazaki K, Han J, Uchida H (2016) Numerical investigation and optimization of pulsating and variable blank holder force for identification of formability window for deep drawing of cylindrical cup. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 82(1):583–593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mrad H, Bouazara M, Aryanpour G (2013) A reliability study of springback on the sheet metal forming process under probabilistic variation of prestrain and blank holder force. Acta Mech Sinica 29(4):557–566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Su CJ, Wang XT, Wang Q (2015) Sheet metal springback control by variable blank holder force and controllable drawbead. J Plast Eng 22(6):47–51Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Su CJ, Zhang P, Wang XT, Wang Q (2016) Influence rule of controllable draw-bead on springback in hat-shape sheet bending. J Plast Eng 23(2):81–86Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zhou J, Hua JJ, Yang DS, Zhuang YY, Yi ZH (2010) Deep drawing simulation for high-strength steel box of controllable drawbead. J Chongqing Univ 33(6):42–49Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wang GK, Cheng SY, Li SY, Zhang XW (2011) Application of numerical simulation in stamping process of complex box-type parts. Adv Mater Res 291-294:579–584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Acquisto LD, Fratini L (2006) Springback effect evaluation in three-dimensional stamping processes at the varying of blankholder force. Proc IMechE 220(11):1827–1837CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ma GY, Huang BB, Jiang SB, Chen K (2013) Analysis of process parameters influencing V-bending based on Dynaform. Appl Mech Mater 423-426:1858–1861CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zeng X, Peng BY, Liao LZ, Cheng YK (2014) Application research and analysis of bending springback of semi-circular arc stamping parts based on DYNAFORM. Appl Mech Mater 543-547:3931–3934CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Koyama H, Wagoner RH, Manabe K (2004) Blank holding force control in panel stamping process using a database and FEM-assisted intelligent press control system. J Mater Process Technol 152(2):190–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Meng DA, Zhao SD, Li L, Liu C (2016) A servo-motor driven active blank holder control system for deep drawing process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 87(9):3185–3193CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chunjian Su
    • 1
  • Ke Zhang
    • 1
  • Shumei Lou
    • 1
  • Tingting Xu
    • 1
  • Qing Wang
    • 2
  1. 1.College of Mechanical and Electronic EngineeringShandong University of Science and TechnologyQingdaoChina
  2. 2.College of Civil Engineering and ArchitectureShandong University of Science and TechnologyQingdaoChina

Personalised recommendations