Advertisement

Additive manufacturing scenarios for distributed production of spare parts

  • Luiz Fernando C. S. Durão
  • Alexander Christ
  • Eduardo Zancul
  • Reiner Anderl
  • Klaus Schützer
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Abstract

Spare parts manufacturing and in-time provision are complex activities for several industries. One of the decisions that need to be made on a spare parts production is related to the location of the production. The distributed manufacturing of spare parts in locations closer to the final user may have several advantages, such as reduced delivery lead times and reduced logistics costs. However, distributed manufacturing by the adoption of advanced manufacturing technologies raises challenges in terms of information exchange, communication, and control between the production sites. The connected industrial environment, brought by what has been called the 4th Industrial Revolution, might be the answer for this challenge. Therefore, the aim of this paper is to characterize centralization and independence levels between a central factory and a distributed production site for the manufacturing of spare parts leveraging additive manufacturing as main production process. Use cases have been developed with design and engineering—providing the product model—in Germany and the additive manufacturing (AM) site—providing the manufacturing structure and machines—in Brazil, together forming a distributed development and manufacturing network. Four implemented use cases demonstrate the evolution of the independence level between the central factory and the distributed site. The analyses focus on implications for work organization, network performance, and intellectual property protection. Results show that the connection, communication, and control brought by advanced manufacturing technologies and connected industrial environment to distributed manufacturing change the organizational structure of both sites creating a flexible focused factory with the production closer to the final client and the specialization centered at the central factory.

Keywords

Distributed manufacturing Additive manufacturing Advanced manufacturing Industrie 4.0 Spare parts Organizational structure 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Anderl R (2015) Industrie 4.0—technological approaches, use cases, and implementation. Automatisierungstechnik 753–765:Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brettel M, Friederichsen N, Keller M, Rosenberg M (2014) How virtualization, decentralization and network building change the manufacturing landscape: an Industry 4.0 perspective. Int J Mech Aerospace. Ind Mechatronics Eng 8:37–44Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ariss S, Raghunathan T, Kunnathar A (2000) Factors affecting the adoption of advanced manufacturing technology in small firms. S.A.M. Adv. Manag. J. 65:Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jonsson P (2000) An empirical taxonomy of advanced manufacturing technology. Int J Oper Prod Manag 20Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Schroder R, Sohal A (1999) Organizational characteristics associated with AMT adoption: towards a contingency framework. Int J Oper Prod Manag 19Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kagermann H, Wahlster W, Helbig J (2013) Recommendations for implementing the strategic initiative INDUSTRIE 4.0. Final Rep Ind 40 WG 82.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Khajavi SH, Partanen J, Holmström J (2014) Additive manufacturing in the spare parts supply chain. Comput Ind 65:50–63. doi: 10.1016/j.compind.2013.07.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Schroder R, Sohal A (1999) Organizational characteristics associated with AMT adoption: towards a contingency framework. Int J Oper Prod Manag 19Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    CY B (2008) Modularity, transactions, and the boundaries of firms: a synthesis. Indust Corp Chang 17:155–196.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zhou YM (2012) Designing for complexity: using divisions and hierarchy to manage complex tasks. Organ Sci 24:339–355. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1120.0744 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Aguiar LJ, Cavalcanti R, Furushio LH, et al (2015) Implementation of global Industrie 4.0 additive manufacturing scenarios. DarmstadtGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Machado B.; Marim, G., Martins, P. A.; Ferreira, M. C.; Farah, K. C.; Gregório MG (2016) Implementation of global Industrie 4.0 quality control scenarios. DarmstadtGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Handfield RB, Nichols EL (1999) Introduction to supply chain management. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Noto La Diega S, Perrone G, Piacentini M (1996) Multiobjectives approach for process plan selection in IMS environment. CIRP Ann - Manuf Technol 45:471–474. doi: 10.1016/S0007-8506(07)63104-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Seuring S (2009) The product–relationship-matrix as framework for strategic supply chain design based on operations theory. Int J Prod Econ 120:221–232. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2008.07.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Selldin E, Olhager J (2004) Supply chain management survey of Swedish manufacturing firms. Int J Prod Econ 89:353–361CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pesch MJ (1996) Defining and understanding the focused factory: a Delphi study. Prod Invent Manag J 37:32–36Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hill T (2000) Manufacturing strategy—text and cases. McGraw-Hill, BostonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Parry TR (1997) Achieving balance in decentralization: a case study of education decentralization in Chile. World Dev 25:211–225. doi: 10.1016/S0305-750X(96)00094-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    S. Schlund DM and OGWB (2014) Industrie 4.0 – Volkswirtschaftliches Potenzial für Deutschland. Bitkom - BerlinGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Schmenner RW (2004) Service businesses and productivity. Decis Sci 35:333–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Robsbawn E (1961) The age of revolution. Foreign Aff an Am Q Rev. doi: 10.2307/2145914 Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Durão LFCS, Christ A, Anderl R, et al (2016) Distributed manufacturing of spare parts based on additive manufacturing: use cases and technical aspects. 49 CIRP C.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ariss S, Raghunathan T, Kunnathar A (2000) Factors affecting the adoption of advanced manufacturing technology in small firms. S.A.M. Adv. Manag. J.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sun H (2000) Current and future patterns of using advanced manufacturing technologies. TechnovationGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Boyer K, Pagell M (2000) Measurement issues in empirical research: improving methods of operations strategy and advanced manufacturing technology. J Oper Manag 18Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kotha S (1991) Strategy, manufacturing structure and advanced manufacturing technology. Natl. Conf. Acad, ManagGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kotha S, Swamidass P (2000) Strategy, advance manufacturing technology and performance: empirical evidence from U.S. manufacturing firms. J. Oper. Manag.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Small M, Yasin M (2000) Human factors in the adoption and performance of advanced manufacturing technology in unionized firms. Ind Manag Data Syst:100Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Zammuto R, O’Connor E (1992) Gaining advanced manufacturing technologies benefits the roles of organization design and culture. Acad Manag Rev 17Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Slack N, Lewis M (2001) Operations strategy: reconciling market requirements and operations resources. Prentice HallGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Rommel S, Fischer A (2013) Additive manufacturing—a growing possibility to lighten the burden of spare parts supply. Digit. Prod. Process Dev. Syst, In, pp 112–123Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Mançanares CG, de S. Zancul E, Cavalcante da Silva J, Cauchick Miguel P a. (2015) Additive manufacturing process selection based on parts’ selection criteria. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. doi: 10.1007/s00170-015-7092-4
  34. 34.
    Gebhardt A (2011) Understanding additive manufacturing: rapid prototyping, rapid tooling. Hanser, Rapid ManufacturingCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Petrovic V, Vicente Haro Gonzalez J, Jordá Ferrando O et al (2011) Additive layered manufacturing: sectors of industrial application shown through case studies. Int J Prod Res 49:1061–1079. doi: 10.1080/00207540903479786 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Grimm M, Christ A, Anderl R (2015) Distributed additive manufacturing—concept for the application of JT (ISO 14306) as downstream process format. ASME 2015 Int. Des. Eng. Tech. Conf. Comput. Inf. Eng. Conf.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Dewar R, Hage J (1978) Size, technology, complexity, and structural differentiation: toward a theoretical synthesis. Admin Sci Quart 23:111–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Becker GSMK (1992) The division of labor, coordination costs, and knowledge. Quart J Econ 107:1137–1160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Boyer K, Leong GK, Ward P, Krajewski L (1997) Unlocking the potential of advanced manufacturing technologies. J Oper Manag 15:331–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Schroder R, Sohal AS (1999) Organisational characteristics associated with AMT adoption: towards a contingency framework. Int J Oper Prod Manag 19:1270–1291. doi: 10.1108/01443579910294237 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Metternich J, Abele E (2015) Process Learning Factory http://www.prozesslernfabrik.de/

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Production Engineering, Polytechnic SchoolUniversity of São PauloSão PauloBrazil
  2. 2.Department of Computer Integrated DesignTechnische Universität DarmstadtDarmstadtGermany
  3. 3.Laboratory for Computer Integrated Design and ManufacturingMethodist University of PiracicabaSanta Bárbara d’OesteBrazil

Personalised recommendations