A novel multi-probe method for separating spindle radial error from artifact roundness error
- 116 Downloads
Conventional three-probe method of artifact roundness and spindle error measurements is subjected to the trouble of harmonic suppression, which is also mathematically complicated due to complex transformation processing. A novel three-probe method by solving system of multivariable equation (SSME) method is presented in this paper. The presented method simplifies the mathematical processing and has good robustness to the measurement angles which are difficult for conventional three-probe method. This paper gives mathematical models, detailed theoretical derivations, and numerical simulations. Selection criteria of the optimal measurement angle combinations can be determined in accordance with rank and condition number of the coefficient matrix. Then, to validate the feasibility and repeatability of the proposed method, experimental measurements are performed on a vertical machine tool spindle by using nanometer-resolution capacitive displacement sensors, high-precision indexing table, and professional data acquisition system. Artifact roundness error and spindle radial error are tested to validate separation accuracy by specialized instruments. The comparisons demonstrate that the proposed method has good feasibility and repeatability (the maximum deviations of spindle error and roundness error are 9.62 and 3.86%). SSME method, due to its simplicity in computation and the uniqueness of the solution provided, is more suitable to separate spindle radial error from the artifact roundness error.
KeywordsMachine tool Spindle error Roundness error Multi-probe error separation method
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.ISO 230–7 (2006) Test code for machine tools. Part 7: Geometric accuracy of axes of rotation, International Standardization Organization. Geneva, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
- 2.ANSI/ASME B89.3.4 (2010) Axes of rotation; Methods for Specifying and Testing. ASME, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 5.Donaldson RR (1972) A simple method for separating spindle error from test ball roundness error. Ann CIRP 21(1):125–126Google Scholar
- 10.Grejda RD (2002) Use and calibration or ultraprecision axes of rotation with nanometer level metrology. PhD Dissertation. Pennsylvania State UniversityGoogle Scholar
- 16.Marsh ER (2010) Precision spindle metrology. DEStech Publications, LancasterGoogle Scholar
- 17.Zhang YH, Wang XL (1998) A method for optimizing the angle positions of the probes in roundness and spindle error motion measurement with three-probe method. Optics Precis Eng 6(5):38–45 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- 21.Lian QR (2000) Linear algebra and analytic geometry. China Higher Education Press Beijing and Springer – Verlag Heidelberg (in Chinese)Google Scholar
- 22.Sauer T (2014) Numerical analysis (Second edition). China Machine PressGoogle Scholar
- 23.Li M (2004) The study on improved genetic algorithm and its application in optimization questions. Thesis of Jilin University (in Chinese)Google Scholar