Advertisement

Cutting temperature analysis and experiment of Ti–MoS2/Zr-coated cemented carbide tool

  • Wenlong Song
  • Zuocheng Wang
  • Jianxin Deng
  • Ke Zhou
  • Shoujun Wang
  • Zongxin Guo
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Abstract

To improve the tribological properties of the cemented carbide, Ti–MoS2/Zr composite coatings were deposited on the substrate surface by medium-frequency magnetron sputtering coupled with multi-arc ion plating. The morphology and fundamental properties of the coatings were examined. Dry machining test on AISI 1045 hardened steel was carried out with the coated tool and uncoated tool. The variation of cutting temperature was tested by a TH5104 thermo tracer. The results showed that cutting speed had a profound effect on the cutting temperature. In low-speed cutting of less than 120 m/min, the cutting temperature was decreased by 18–22% and flank wear resistance was improved by 25–30% in comparison with that of uncoated tool, while in high-speed cutting, there was not much difference in cutting performance owing to the high temperature caused by the elevated cutting speed. Through the analysis of cutting heat distribution theory, two responsible mechanisms are found: as lubricating additive between the tool and chip sliding couple, the Ti–MoS2/Zr composite coatings contribute to the decrease of average shear stress on the rake face and the thermal barrier effect in heat conduction. These may result in the decrease of the cutting temperature of tool and chip, and hence the improvement of tool wear resistance.

Keywords

Cemented carbide Ti–MoS2/Zr composite coatings Wear resistance Cutting temperature Cutting heat distribution 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Ai X (2004) High speed machining technology. National Defense Industry Press, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sreejith PS, Ngoi BKA (2000) Dry machining: machining of the future. J Mater Process Technol 101:287–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Özbek NA, Çiçek A, Gülesin M, Özbek O (2014) Investigation of the effects of cryogenic treatment applied at different holding times to cemented carbide inserts on tool wear. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 86:34–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ahmet M, Ihsan K (2014) Machinability of a Ti-6Al-4V alloy with cryogenically treated cemented carbide tools. Mater Technol 48:577–580Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Serdyuk YD, Semizhon OA, Prokopiv NM, Petasyuk GA, Kharchenko OV, Mel’chuk TV (2011) The influence of thermal compression treatment parameters on quality characteristics and wear mechanisms of T5K10 carbide inserts in rough turning. J Superhard Mater 33:120–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ezugwu EO, Okeke CI (2001) Tool life and wear mechanisms of TiN coated tools in an intermittent cutting operation. J Mater Process Technol 116:10–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Klocke F, Krieg T (1999) Coated tools for metal cutting-features and applications. CIRP Ann-Manuf Technol 48:515–525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Su GS, Liu ZQ (2012) Wear characteristics of nano TiAlN-coated carbide tools in ultra-high speed machining of Aer Met 100. Wear 289:124–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Long Y, Zeng JJ, Yu DH, Wu SH (2014a) Microstructure of TiAlN and CrAlN coatings and cutting performance of coated silicon nitride inserts in cast iron turning. Ceram Int 40:9889–9894CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Long Y, Zeng JJ, Wu SH (2014b) Cutting performance and wear mechanism of Ti-Al-N/Al-Cr-O coated silicon nitride ceramic cutting inserts. Ceram Int 40:9615–9620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Deng JX, Liu AH (2013) Dry sliding wear behavior of PVD TiN, Ti55Al45N, and Ti35Al65N coatings at temperatures up to 600 °C. Int J Refract Met Hard Mater 41:241–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zhang KD, Deng JX, Meng R, Lei ST, Yu XM (2016a) Influence of laser substrate pretreatment on anti- adhesive wear properties of WC/Co-based TiAlN coatings against AISI 316 stainless steel. J Refract Met Hard Mater 57:101–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sahin Y, Sur G (2004) The effect of Al2O3, TiN and Ti (CN) based CVD coatings on tool wear in machining metal matrix composites. Surf Coat Technol 179:349–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Deng JX, Liu JH, Zhao JL, Song WL, Niu M (2008a) Friction and wear behaviors of the PVD ZrN coated carbide in sliding wear tests and in machining processes. Wear 264:298–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yan P, Deng JX, Wu Z, Li SP, Xing YQ, Zhao J (2012) Friction and wear behavior of the PVD (Zr,Ti) N coated cemented carbide against 40Cr hardened steel. J Refract Met Hard Mater 35:213–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rivero A, Aramendi G, Herranz S, de Lacalle LNL (2006) An experimental investigation of the effect of coatings and cutting parameters on the dry drilling performance of aluminium alloys. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 28:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dos Santos JABO, Sales WF, Santos SC, Machado AR, da Silva MB, Bonney J, Ezugwu EO (2007) Tribological evaluation of TiN and TiAlN coated PM-HSS gear cutter when machining 19MnCr5 steel. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 31:629–637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tsao CC (2007) An experiment study of hard coating and cutting fluid effect in milling aluminum alloy. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 32:885–891CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Abdel-Aal HA, Nouari M, El Mansori M, Ginting A (2008) Conceptual tribo-energetic analysis of cutting tool protective coating delamination in dry cutting of hard-to-cut aero engine alloys. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 36:213–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pfeiler M, Kutschej K, Penoy M, Michotte C, Mitterer C, Kathrein M (2009) The effect of increasing V content on structure, mechanical and tribological properties of arc evaporated Ti-Al-V-N coatings. Int J Refract Met Hard Mater 27:502–506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sprute T, Tillmann W, Grisales D, Selvadurai U, Fischer G (2014) Influence of substrate pre-treatments on residual stresses and tribo-mechanical properties of TiAlN based PVD coatings. Surf Coat Technol 260:369–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Quesada F, Mariño A, Restrepo E (2006) TiAlN coatings deposited by r. f. magnetron sputtering on previously treated ASTM A36 steel. Surf Coat Technol 201:2925–2929CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tillmann W, Vogli E, Momeni S (2009) Mechanical and tribological properties of Ti/TiAlN duplex coatings on high and low alloy tool steels. Vacuum 84:387–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Shi MS (2000) Solid lubricating materials. China Chemical Industry Press, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Xing YQ, Deng JX, Zhou YH, Li SP (2014) Fabrication and tribological properties of Al2O3/TiC ceramic with nano-textures and WS2/Zr soft-coatings. Surf Coat Technol 258:699–710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Qin YK, Xiong DS, Li JL (2015) Tribological properties of laser surface textured and plasma electrolytic oxidation duplex-treated Ti6Al4V alloy deposited with MoS2 film. Surf Coat Technol 269:266–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Zhang KD, Deng JX, Lei ST, Yu XM (2016b) Effect of micro/nano-textures and burnished MoS2 addition on the tribological properties of PVD TiAlN coatings against AISI 316 stainless steel. Surf Coat Technol 291:282–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Watanabe S, Noshiro J, Miyake S (2004) Tribological characteristics of WS2/MoS2 solid lubricating multilayer films. Surf Coat Techol 183(2–3):347–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Donnet C, Martin JM, Mogne TL, Belin M (1996) Super-low friction of MoS2 coatings in various environments. Tribol Int 29(2):123–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Martins RC, Paulo SM, Seabra JO (2006) MoS2/Ti low-friction coating for gears. Tribol Int 39(12):1686–1697CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Renevier NM, Oosterling H, Kőnig U, Dautzenberg H, Kim BJ, Geppert L, Koopmans FGM, Leopold J (2003) Performance and limitations of MoS2/Ti composite coated inserts. Surf Coat Techol 172:13–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Renevier NM, Fox VC, Teer DG, Hampshire J (2000) Performance of low friction MoS2/titanium composite coatings used in forming applications. Mater Des 21:337–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Rigato V, Maggioni G, Patelli A, Renevier NM, Teer DG (2000) Properties of sputter-deposited MoS2/metal composite coatings deposited by closed field unbalanced magnetron sputter ion plating. Surf Coat Techol 131:206–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Renevier NM, Hamphire J, Fox VC (2001) Advantages of using self-lubricating, hard, wear-resistant MoS2-based coatings. Surf Coat Technol 142-144:67–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Deng JX, Song WL, Zhang H, Zhao JL (2008b) Performance of PVD Ti-MoS2/Zr coated carbide in cutting processes. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 48:1546–1552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Nakayama K (1985) Principle of metal cutting. China Machine Press, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Chen RY (1993) Metal-cutting principles. China Machine Press, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Usui E (1982) Mechanical metal processing. China Machine Press, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Wang K (2007) Technique of temperature measurement. China Machine Press, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Song WL, Deng JX, Zhang H, Yan P (2011) Cutting performance of cemented-carbides-based self-lubricated tool embedded with different solid lubricants. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 52:477–485CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wenlong Song
    • 1
    • 2
  • Zuocheng Wang
    • 1
  • Jianxin Deng
    • 3
  • Ke Zhou
    • 2
  • Shoujun Wang
    • 2
  • Zongxin Guo
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Material Science and EngineeringShandong UniversityJinanPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.DePartment of Mechanical EngineeringJining UniversityQufuPeople’s Republic of China
  3. 3.Department of Mechanical EngineeringShandong UniversityJinanPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations