Advertisement

Research on mechanism of generating aluminum droplets smaller than the nozzle diameter by pneumatic drop-on-demand technology

  • Song-Yi Zhong
  • Le-Hua Qi
  • Wei Xiong
  • Jun Luo
  • Qing-Xiang Xu
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Abstract

Droplet-based manufacturing (DBM) process has great potential in directly fabricating metal parts. In order to enhance the practicability of DBM, decreasing droplet size becomes the research focus in this field. In the present work, a novel pneumatic-driven droplet generator structure was proposed and the mechanism of generating aluminum droplets smaller than the nozzle diameter was studied. By conducting simulation experiments, the effects of structure parameters on droplet formation process and droplet size were investigated. The results indicated that the aspect ratio of the nozzle hole (i) and the distance between inlet hole and nozzle hole (H 1) had significant effects on droplet size while the diameter of the inlet hole had little effect. Droplets smaller than the nozzle diameter could be produced only when i and H 1 were 1 and 1 mm, respectively. Based on the optimized structure parameters, a generator was developed and droplet-ejecting experiments were carried out. By using a nozzle with the diameter of 500 μm, aluminum droplets with the mean diameter of 359.9 μm were produced stably and then a rectangular tube was fabricated by depositing droplets sequentially. The results demonstrated the capability of the novel generator to produce small droplets and to fabricate parts directly.

Keywords

Droplet-based manufacturing Pneumatic driven Droplet generator Aluminum droplet Droplet formation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Huang SH, Liu P, Mokasdar A, Hou L (2013) Additive manufacturing and its societal impact: a literature review. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 67:1191–1203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Vaezi M, Seitz H, Yang S (2013) A review on 3D micro-additive manufacturing technologies. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 67:1721–1754CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jiang X, Qi L, Luo J, Huang H, Zhou J (2010) Research on accurate droplet generation for micro-droplet deposition manufacture. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 49:535–541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Orme ME, Huang C, Courier J (1996) Precision droplet-based manufacturing and material synthesis: fluid dynamics and thermal control issues. Atomization and Sprays 6:305–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Liu Q, Orme M (2001) On precision droplet-based net-form manufacturing technology. Proc Inst Mech Eng B J Eng Manuf 215:1333–1355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chen C, Acquaviva P, Chun J, Ando T (1996) Effects of droplet thermal state on deposit microstructure in spray forming. Scr Mater 34:689–696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chen C, Chun J, Sohlenius G (1997) Development of a droplet-based manufacturing process for free-form fabrication. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 46:131–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Qi L, Luo J, Zhou J, Hou X, Li H (2011) Predication and measurement of deflected trajectory and temperature history of uniform metal droplets in microstructures fabrication. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 55:997–1006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fang M, Chandra S, Park CB (2008) Building three-dimensional objects by deposition of molten metal droplets. Rapid Prototyp J 14:44–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cao W, Miyamoto Y (2006) Freeform fabrication of aluminum parts by direct deposition of molten aluminum. J Mater Process Technol 173:209–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cao WB, Kirihara S, Miyamoto Y, Matsuura K, Kudoh M (2002) Development of freeform fabrication method for Ti–Al–Ni intermetallics. Intermetallics 10:879–885CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jin Y, He Y, Gao Q, Fu J, Fu G (2014) Droplet deviation modeling and compensation scheme of inkjet printing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 75:1405–1415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lee T, Kang TG, Yang JS, Jo J, Kim K, Choi B, Kim D (2008) Gap adjustable molten metal DoD inkjet system with cone-shaped piston head. J Manuf Sci Eng 130:31113–31116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Taik-Min L, Tae GK, Jeong-Soon Y, Jeongdai J, Kwang-Young K, Byung-Oh C, Dong-Soo K (2008) Drop-on-demand solder droplet jetting system for fabricating microstructure. Electronics Packaging Manufacturing, IEEE Transactions on 31:202–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yamaguchi K, Sakai K, Yamanaka T, Hirayama T (2000) Generation of three-dimensional micro structure using metal jet. Precis Eng 24:2–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cheng SX, Li T, Chandra S (2005) Producing molten metal droplets with a pneumatic droplet-on-demand generator. J Mater Process Technol 159:295–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Luo J, Qi L, Zhou J, Hou X, Li H (2012) Modeling and characterization of metal droplets generation by using a pneumatic drop-on-demand generator. J Mater Process Technol 212:718–726CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sakai S (2000) Dynamics of piezoelectric inkjet printing systems. NIP & Digital Fabrication Conference 2000:15–20Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Chen AU, Basaran OA (2002) A new method for significantly reducing drop radius without reducing nozzle radius in drop-on-demand drop production. Phys Fluids 14(1):L1–L4CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Amirzadeh Goghari A, Chandra S (2008) Producing droplets smaller than the nozzle diameter by using a pneumatic drop-on-demand droplet generator. Exp Fluids 44:105–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Amirzadeh GA (2010) Producing small droplets of aqueous solutions and molten metals using a pneumatic droplet generator. University of Toronto Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Doctor TorontoGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Amirzadeh A, Raessi M, Chandra S (2013) Producing molten metal droplets smaller than the nozzle diameter using a pneumatic drop-on-demand generator. Exp Thermal Fluid Sci 47(5):26–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zhong S, Qi L, Luo J, Zuo H, Hou X, Li H (2014) Effect of process parameters on copper droplet ejecting by pneumatic drop-on-demand technology. J Mater Process Technol 214:3089–3097CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Cheng S, Chandra S (2003) A pneumatic droplet-on-demand generator. Exp Fluids 34:755–762CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Song-Yi Zhong
    • 1
  • Le-Hua Qi
    • 1
    • 2
  • Wei Xiong
    • 1
  • Jun Luo
    • 1
  • Qing-Xiang Xu
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Mechanical EngineeringNorthwestern Polytechnical UniversityXi’anPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.The Key Laboratory of Contemporary Design and Integrated Manufacturing TechnologyNorthwestern Polytechnical UniversityXi’anPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations