Multiple classification of the force and acceleration signals extracted during multiple machine processes: part 1 intelligent classification from an anomaly perspective
This paper is the first in a two-part work, where the investigation into the characteristics of multiple machine processes is made in order to accurately control them via the frequently used machine centre platform. The two machining processes under investigation are grinding and hole making: for grinding anomalies, grinding burn and chatter and for hole making, drilling, increased tool wear and onset of drill tool malfunction, which is also significant to severe scoring and material dragging. Most researchers usually report on one machining process as opposed to multiple which is less consistent with automated flexible systems where more than one machining process must be catered for. For efficient monitoring of automated multiple manufacturing processes, any unwanted anomalies should be identified and dealt with in a prompt and seamless manner. This first part provides two experimental set-ups (same set-up with tool interchange) to obtain signal signatures for both grinding and drilling phenomena (using the same material). Here, an approach based on neural networks and CARTs is used to reliably detect anomalies for both processes using a single acquisition path, opening the door for control implementation.
KeywordsBurn Chatter Force Accelerations Drilling Tool malfunction Grinding CART Neural network STFT
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Zelinski, P. (2005). How to perfect a machining process (Or at least how to make it more trustworthy). Modern Machine ShopGoogle Scholar
- 3.Liu, Q. (2004). Pattern recognition of grinding defects and assessment strategies of grinding. Dissertation University of Nottingham. School of M3.Google Scholar
- 4.Pratap, S., Daultani, Y., Tiwari, M., & Mahanty, B. (2015). Rule based optimization for a bulk handling port operations. Journal of Intelligent manufacturing, 1–25.Google Scholar
- 8.Pour M (2015) Simultaneous application of time series analysis and wavelet transform for determining surface roughness of the ground workpieces. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 85(5–8):1793–1805Google Scholar
- 9.Kaplonek W, Nadolny K, Królczyk G (2016) The use of focus-variation microscopy for the assessment of active surfaces of a new generation of coated abrasive tools. Measuring Science. Review 16(2):42–53Google Scholar
- 10.Dominguez J, Manson G, Marshall M (2016) Tool condition monitoring of ceramic inserted tools in high speed machining through image processing. International Journal of Mechanical, Aerospace, Industrial, Mechatronic and Manufacturing Engineering 10(8):1391–1398Google Scholar
- 13.DeHart, A., & Murphy, D. (2004). Machine shopping: how to become a better-informed machine tool consumer. Retrieved from American Machinist: http://americanmachinist.com/machining-cutting/machine-shopping
- 15.Tonshoff HK, Fremuth T et al (1994) Process monitoring in grinding. Institute of Production Engineering and Machine Tools, HannoverGoogle Scholar
- 16.Griffin J, Chen X (2014) Real-time neural network classifications of characteristics from emitted acoustic emission during horizontal single grit scratch tests. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 1–17Google Scholar
- 17.Rowe WB, Chen X (1996) Grinding vibration detection using a neural network. Journal of Engineering Manufacture 210(4):349–352Google Scholar
- 19.Breiman L, Friedman J, Olshen R, Stone C (1984) Classification and regression trees. WadsworthGoogle Scholar
- 23.Mallet S (1999) A wavelet tour of signal processing. Academic Press, San DiegoGoogle Scholar