Skip to main content
Log in

Numerical investigation of the forming capability of bulge process by using rubber as a forming medium

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A finite element simulation of flexible bulge forming of aluminum sheet metal is carried out. The effect of rubber pad on forming capability is studied by comparing flexible bulge to hydroforming. Based on the theory of Continuum Damage Mechanics (CDM), a local approach with fully coupling between ductile damage and an anisotropic elasto-plastic model with mixed nonlinear kinematic/isotropic hardening is introduced. The model is implemented into a user-defined material (VUMAT) subroutine for the commercial finite element code ABAQUS/Explicit. A Mooney-Rivlin theory is adopted for rubber material behavior. Comparisons between both processes in terms of thickness variation, damage occurrence, and sheet formability are conducted for different rubber shores and friction. Numerical findings are in a good correlation with experiments from literature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Al-Qureshi HA (1971) Factors affecting the strain distribution of thin walled tubes using polyurethane rod. Mech Sei Pergamon Press 13:403–413

    Google Scholar 

  2. Al-Qureshi HA, Das MK (1974) Thin walled tube cropping using elastomer. Mach Tool Des Res 16:77–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Belhassen L, Koubaa S, Wali M, Dammak F (2016) Numerical prediction of springback and ductile damage in rubber pad forming process of aluminum sheet metal. Int J Mech sci 117:218–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gao TJ, Liu Y, Chen P, Wang ZJ (2015) Analysis of bulging process of aluminum alloy by overlapping sheet metal and its formability. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China 25: 1050–1055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ramazeni M, Ripin ZM (2012) Combined experimental and numerical analysis of bulge test at high strain rates using split Hopkinson pressure bar apparatus. Mater Process Technol 210: 1061–1069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ramazeni M, Ripin ZM, Ahmad R (2009) Computer aided modelling of friction in rubber pad forming process. Mater Process Technol 209:4925–4934

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ramazeni M, Ripin ZM, Ahmad R (2010) Combined experimental and numerical analysis of bulge test at high strain rates using split Hopkinson pressure bar apparatus. Manuf Sci Technol 3: 196–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Shen Z, Liu H, Wang X, Wang C (2016) Improving the forming capability of laser dynamic forming by using rubber as a forming medium. Appl Surf Sci 369:288–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sun YN, Wan M, Wu XD (2012) Friction coefficient in rubber forming process of Ti-15-3 alloy. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China 22:2952–2959

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Thiruvarudchelvani S (1994) A theory for the bulging of aluminum tubes using a urethane rod. Mater Process Technol 41:311–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Thiruvarudchelvani S, Lua AC (1991) Bulge forming of tubes with axial compressive force proportional to the hydraulic pressure. Mater Shap Technol 9:133–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Thiruvarudchelvani S, Travis FW (1990) Tube bulging with a yrethane rod. Mater Process Technol 23:195–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang ZJ, Yuan BX (2014) Numerical analysis of coupled finite element with element free Galerkin in sheet flexible die forming. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China 24:462–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ahmed M, Hashmi MSJ (1997) Defects in hydraulic bulge forming of tubular components and their implication for design and control of the process. Advanced Methods in Material Processing Defects

  15. Badreddine H, Saanouni K, Dogui A (2010) On non-associative anisotropic finite plasticity fully coupled with isotropic ductile damage for metal forming. Plasticity 117:218–226

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Chamekh A, Bel Hadg Salah H, Hambli R, Gahbiche A (2006) Inverse identification using the bulge test and artificial neural networks. Mater Process Technol 177:307–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kacem A, Krichen AK, Manach PY (2015) Finite element analysis of hole-flanging process with various anisotropy assumptions. Adv Manuf Technol 80:11–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Koubaa S, Mars J, Wali M, Dammak F (2017) Numerical study of anisotropic behavior of aluminum alloy subjected to dynamic perforation. Int J Impact Eng 101:105–114

  19. Lemaitre J, Chaboche JL (1990) Mechanics of solid materials. Cambridge University Press

  20. Liang JC, Gao S, Teng F, Yu PZ, Song XJ (2014) Flexible 3D stretch bending technology for aluminum profile. Adv Manuf Technol 71:1939–1947

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mac Donald BJ, Hashmi MSJ Finite element simulation of axisymmetric bulge forming: effects of the process on the die. European Congress on Computational Methods in Apllied Sciences and Engineering, Barcelona

  22. Mac Donald BJ, Hashmi MSJ (2001) Three dimensional finite element simulation of bulge processing using a solid bulging medium. Finite Elem Anal Des 37:107–116

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Mars J, Wali M, Jarraya A, Dammak F (2015) Finite element implementation of an orthotropic plasticity model for sheet metal in low velocity impact simulations. Thin Walled Struct 89:93–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Mooney M (1940) A theory of large elastic deformation. Appl Phys 11:582–592

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Moreira Filho LA, Al Qureshi HA (1985) Unconventional tee forming on metal tubes. Transactions of the ASME 107:392–396

  26. Quadrin F, Santo L, Squeo EA (2010) Flexible forming of thin aluminum alloy sheets. Modern Manufacturing Technologies 11:2067–3604

    Google Scholar 

  27. Reis LC, Pratesi PA, Olivera MC, Santos AD, Fernandes JV (2016) Inverse identification of the Swift law parameters using the bulge test. Int J Mater Form. doi:10.1007/s12289-016-1296-5

  28. Texeira P, Santos AD, Andrade Pires FM, Cesar de Sa JMA (2006) Finite element prediction of ductile fracture in sheet metal forming processes. Mater Process Technol 177:278–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Wali M, Autay R, Mars J, Dammak F (2016) A simple integration algorithm for a non associated anisotropic plasticity model for sheet metal forming. Int J Numer Methods Eng 107:183–204

  30. Wali M, Chouchene H, Ben Said L, Dammak F (2015) One equation integration algorithm of a generalized quadratic yield function with Chaboche non linear isotropic kinematic hardening. Int J Mech sci 92:223–232

  31. Wang A, Zhong K, El Fakir O, Liu J, Sun C, Wang LL, Lin J, Dean T (2016) Springback analysis of AA5754 after hot stamping:experiments and FE modelling. Adv Manuf Technol 24:462–469

    Google Scholar 

  32. Xu J, Zhou Y, Cui J, Sun G, Li G (2016) Experimental study for rubber pad forming process of AZ31 magnesium alloy sheets at warm temperature. Adv Manuf Technol 89:1079–1087

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sana Koubaa.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Koubaa, S., Belhassen, L., Wali, M. et al. Numerical investigation of the forming capability of bulge process by using rubber as a forming medium. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 92, 1839–1848 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0278-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0278-1

Keywords

Navigation