Digital twin-driven product design, manufacturing and service with big data

  • Fei TaoEmail author
  • Jiangfeng Cheng
  • Qinglin Qi
  • Meng Zhang
  • He Zhang
  • Fangyuan Sui


Nowadays, along with the application of new-generation information technologies in industry and manufacturing, the big data-driven manufacturing era is coming. However, although various big data in the entire product lifecycle, including product design, manufacturing, and service, can be obtained, it can be found that the current research on product lifecycle data mainly focuses on physical products rather than virtual models. Besides, due to the lack of convergence between product physical and virtual space, the data in product lifecycle is isolated, fragmented, and stagnant, which is useless for manufacturing enterprises. These problems lead to low level of efficiency, intelligence, sustainability in product design, manufacturing, and service phases. However, physical product data, virtual product data, and connected data that tie physical and virtual product are needed to support product design, manufacturing, and service. Therefore, how to generate and use converged cyber-physical data to better serve product lifecycle, so as to drive product design, manufacturing, and service to be more efficient, smart, and sustainable, is emphasized and investigated based on our previous study on big data in product lifecycle management. In this paper, a new method for product design, manufacturing, and service driven by digital twin is proposed. The detailed application methods and frameworks of digital twin-driven product design, manufacturing, and service are investigated. Furthermore, three cases are given to illustrate the future applications of digital twin in the three phases of a product respectively.


Digital twin Product lifecycle Design Manufacturing Service Big data Cyber and physical convergence 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Stark J (2015) Product lifecycle management. Springer International Publishing, SwitzerlandCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Xu LD, He W, Li S (2014) Internet of things in industries: a survey. IEEE Trans Ind Informat 10(4):2233–2243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jiang L, Xu LD, Cai H et al (2014) An IoT-oriented data storage framework in cloud computing platform. IEEE Trans Ind Informat 10(2):1443–1451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    O'Leary DE (2013) Artificial intelligence and big data. IEEE Intell Syst 28(2):96–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Li J, Tao F, Cheng Y, Zhao L (2015) Big data in product lifecycle management. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 81(1–4):667–684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Matsokis A, Kiritsis D (2010) An ontology-based approach for product lifecycle management. Comput Ind 61(8):787–797CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kiritsis D, Bufardi A, Xirouchakis P (2003) Research issues on product lifecycle management and information tracking using smart embedded systems. Advd Engng Inf 17(3):189–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Srinivasan V (2011) An integration framework for product lifecycle management. Comput Aided Des 43(5):464–478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Vezzetti E, Moos S, Kretli S (2011) A product lifecycle management methodology for supporting knowledge reuse in the consumer packaged goods domain. Comput Aided Des 43(12):1902–1911CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tao F, Cheng J, Cheng Y et al (2017a) SDMSim: a manufacturing service supply–demand matching simulator under cloud environment. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 45:34–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Xu LD, Wang C, Bi Z et al (2012) AutoAssem: an automated assembly planning system for complex products. IEEE Trans Ind Informat 8(3):669–678CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dean J (1950) Pricing policies for new products. Harv Bus Rev 28(6):45–53Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Levitt T (1965) Exploit the product life cycle. Harv Bus Rev 43(6):81–94Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rink DR, Swan JE (1979) Product life cycle research: a literature review. J Bus Res 7(3):219–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nevins JL, Whitney DE (1989) Concurrent design of products and processes: a strategy for the next generation in manufacturing. McGraw-Hill Companies, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ryan C, Riggs WE (1996) Redefining the product life cycle: the five-element product wave. Business Horizons 39(5):33–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cao H, Folan P (2012) Product life cycle: the evolution of a paradigm and literature review from 1950–2009. Prod Plan Con 23(8):641–662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zhang J, Gao L, Qin W et al (2016) Big-data-driven operation analysis and decision-making methodology in intelligent workshop. Comput Integr Manuf Sys 22(5):1221–1229Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Grieves M (2014) Digital twin: manufacturing excellence through virtual factory replication.
  20. 20.
    Hochhalter J, Leser WP, Newman JA et al (2014a) Coupling damage-sensing particles to the digital twin concept. NASA Center for AeroSpace InformationGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Reifsnider K, Majumdar P (2013) Multiphysics stimulated simulation digital twin methods for fleet management. 54th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference 1578Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Glaessgen E, Stargel D (2012) The digital twin paradigm for future NASA and US Air Force vehicles. 53rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference 20th AIAA/ASME/AHS Adaptive Structures Conference 14th AIAA 1818Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gabor T, Belzner L, Kiermeier M et al (2016) A simulation-based architecture for smart cyber-physical systems. IEEE International Conference on Autonomic Computing (ICAC) 2016:374–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Tuegel EJ, Ingraffea AR, Eason TG et al (2011) Reengineering aircraft structural life prediction using a digital twin. Int J Aeros Eng. doi: 10.1155/2011/154798 Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Smarslok B, Culler A, Mahadevan S (2012) Error quantification and confidence assessment of aerothermal model predictions for hypersonic aircraft. 53rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference 1817Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bielefeldt B, Hochhalter J, Hartl D (2015) Computationally efficient analysis of SMA sensory particles embedded in complex aerostructures using a substructure approach. ASME 2015 Conference on Smart Materials, Adaptive Structures and Intelligent Systems V001T02A007-V001T02A007Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hochhalter J, Leser WP, Newman JA et al (2014b) Coupling damage sensing particles to the digital twin concept.
  28. 28.
    Tuegel E (2012) The airframe digital twin: some challenges to realization. 53rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference 20th AIAA/ASME/AHS Adaptive Structures Conference 14th AIAA 1812Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Cerrone A, Hochhalter J, Heber G et al (2014) On the effects of modeling as-manufactured geometry: toward digital twin. Int J Aerosp Eng. doi: 10.1155/2014/439278 Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Stackpole B (2015) Digital twins land a role in product design.
  31. 31.
    Boschert S, Rosen R (2016) Digital twin—the simulation aspect. In: Mechatronic futures. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland, pp 59–74Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Tao F, Zhang M, Cheng J et al (2017b) Digital twin workshop: a new paradigm for future workshop. Comput Integr Manuf Syst 23(1):1–9Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Tao F, Bi LN, Zuo Y et al (2016a) A hybrid group leader algorithm for green material selection with energy consideration in product design. CIRP Ann - Manuf Technol 65(1):9–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Tao F, Bi LN, Zuo Y et al (2016b) A cooperative co-evolutionary algorithm for large-scale process planning with energy consideration. J Manuf Sci Eng Trans ASME. doi: 10.1115/1.4035960 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fei Tao
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jiangfeng Cheng
    • 1
  • Qinglin Qi
    • 1
  • Meng Zhang
    • 1
  • He Zhang
    • 1
  • Fangyuan Sui
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Automation Science and Electrical EngineeringBeihang UniversityBeijingPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations