Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Study of the current signal and material removal during ultrasonic-assisted electrochemical discharge machining

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Electrochemical discharge machining (ECDM) is a cost-effective machining process used to shape non-conductive materials such as glass and ceramics. The process can overcome poor machinability of hard and brittle materials. Different types of physical phenomena can be added to the ECDM components to improve the machining efficiency. As the main target of this paper, ultrasonic vibration was integrated to the cathode of the ECDM process (UAECDM), which resulted in vibration concentration only to the machining zone. In order to design the experimental configuration, modal analysis was used. Machining speed was the main output of this investigation. Gas film and electric discharge were two main physical phenomena during ECDM. The thickness of gas film, location, and pattern of discharges were determined, experimentally. Also, current signal was a useful tool that could record significant details of involved mechanisms and phenomena during machining. Images of gas film showed that the application of ultrasonic vibration decreased the thickness of gas film by 65%. In addition, the vibration amplitude of 10 μm created the most uniform current signal, which had a considerable effect on the material removal rate (MRR). Results showed that all levels of vibration amplitude increased the machining speed during discharge and hydrodynamic regimes of the machining process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tölke R, Bieberle-Hütter A, Evans A, Rupp J, Gauckler L (2012) Processing of Foturan® glass ceramic substrates for micro-solid oxide fuel cells. J Eur Ceram Soc 32:3229–3238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Song K-Y, Zhang W-J (2013) Application of nanofluids to microsphere generation using MEMS technology. Recent patents on nanotechnology 7:133–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ziaie B, Baldi A, Lei M, Gu Y, Siegel RA (2004) Hard and soft micromachining for BioMEMS: review of techniques and examples of applications in microfluidics and drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 56:145–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cheema MS, Dvivedi A, Sharma AK (2015) Tool wear studies in fabrication of microchannels in ultrasonic micromachining. Ultrasonics 57:57–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ahmed DH, Naser J, Deam RT (2016) Particles impact characteristics on cutting surface during the abrasive water jet machining: numerical study. J Mater Process Technol 232:116–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. S. Mishra, V. Yadava, Finite element (FE) simulation to investigate the effect of sheet thickness on hole taper and heat affected zone (HAZ) during laser beam percussion drilling of thin aluminium sheet lasers in engineering (Old City Publishing), 30 (2015).

  7. S.Y. Liang, A.J. Shih, Electrical discharge machining, in: Analysis of machining and machine tools, Springer, 2016, pp. 167–179.

  8. Chakraborty S, Dey V, Ghosh S (2015) A review on the use of dielectric fluids and their effects in electrical discharge machining characteristics. Precis Eng 40:1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kurafuji H (1968) Electrical discharge drilling of glass I. Ann CIRP 16:415–419

    Google Scholar 

  10. M. Goud, A.K. Sharma, C. Jawalkar, A review on material removal mechanism in electrochemical discharge machining (ECDM) and possibilities to enhance the material removal rate, Precision Engineering, (2016).

  11. Singh T, Dvivedi A (2016) Developments in electrochemical discharge machining: a review on electrochemical discharge machining, process variants and their hybrid methods. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 105:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wüthrich R, Despont B, Maillard P, Bleuler H (2006) Improving the material removal rate in spark-assisted chemical engraving (SACE) gravity-feed micro-hole drilling by tool vibration. J Micromech Microeng 16:N28–N31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Razfar MR, Behroozfar A, Ni J (2014) Study of the effects of tool longitudinal oscillation on the machining speed of electrochemical discharge drilling of glass. Precis Eng 38:885–892

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Han M-S, Min B-K, Lee SJ (2009) Geometric improvement of electrochemical discharge micro-drilling using an ultrasonic-vibrated electrolyte. J Micromech Microeng 19:065004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Rusli M, Furutani K (2012) Performance of micro-hole drilling by ultrasonic-assisted electro-chemical discharge machining. Adv Mater Res 445:865–870

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology, 424, Hafez Ave, Tehran, Iran

    S. Elhami & M.R. Razfar

Authors
  1. S. Elhami
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M.R. Razfar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M.R. Razfar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Elhami, S., Razfar, M. Study of the current signal and material removal during ultrasonic-assisted electrochemical discharge machining. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 92, 1591–1599 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0224-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0224-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation