Additive manufacturing integration with topology optimization methodology for innovative product design

  • Teresa Primo
  • Maurizio Calabrese
  • Antonio Del Prete
  • Alfredo Anglani
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • 485 Downloads

Abstract

Additive manufacturing (AM) processes enable the production of functional parts with complex geometries, multi-materials, as well as individualized mass production. Another significant benefit of AM is the ability to produce optimized geometries with near perfect strength to weight ratios. Weight plays a crucial role in many functional parts such as parts used in automotive and aeronautic industries. Current topology optimization techniques, a powerful tool for weight reduction and product optimization in general, do not work well for such kind of process since AM methods necessitate applying own dedicated design rules. This paper reports a product/process optimization study of a simple test case geometry (C-Clip), where structural optimization has been applied using an innovative approach based on the design of lattice structure feasible thanks to additive process adoption. Moreover, it has been conducted a study to evaluate the possible advantages offered by the integration of the two previous approaches in order to verify the required design specifications. The aim of the work has been to evaluate the potentiality offered by the integration of the two structural optimization approaches (topological and lattice structures design) to obtain innovative and highly performing structures. This activity represents a necessary step for the definition and the subsequent development of a methodology aimed to the creation of structures obtained with this combined design approach. In order to define an objective evaluation of the component performances, appropriate Key Performance Indicators (KPI) have been developed. An engineering intelligence tool has been used to post process the generated optimization results for the three different approaches. Finally, the first three “best” structural solutions have been manufactured by 3D printing machine, with scaled dimensions, in order to evaluate the printing time considering the geometry complexity for the chosen structural layout in order to have useful feedbacks on Product/Process choices interaction.

Keywords

Additive manufacturing Topology optimization Key performance indicators Lattice approach Hybrid approach 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Becker R, Grzesiak A, Henning A (2005) Rethink assembly design. Assem Autom 25:262–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Almeida HDA, da Silva Bártolo PJ (2010) Virtual topological optimisation of scaffolds for rapid prototyping. Medical Engineering & Physics 32:775–782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sundararajan VG (2010) Topology optimization for additive manufacturing of customized meso-structures using homogenization and parametric smoothing functions, Master of Science in Engineering, Texas at AustinGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rezaie R, Badrossamay M, Ghaie A, Moosavi H (2013) Topology optimization for fused deposition modeling process. Procedia CIRP 6:521–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chen Y (2007) 3D texture mapping for rapid manufacturing. Computer-Aided Design & Applications 4:761–771CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Boothroyd G and Marinwscu I (2002) Product design for manufacture and assembly Marcel DekkerGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Godazandeha E, Badrossamay M, Rezaei R, and Tavoosi M (2011) Evaluating fabrication of rapid manufacturing textiles by applying CAD/CAE/AM, presented at the 3rd International Conference on Manufacturing Engineering ICME2011, Iran, TehranGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zhai Y, Lados DA, LaGoy JL (2014) Additive manufacturing: making imagination the major limitation. JOM 66(5):808–816CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hopkinson N, Hague R, Dickens P (ed) (2006) Rapid manufacturing: an industrial revolution for the digital age. John Wiley & SonsGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bendsoe M, Sigmund O (2003) Topology optimization: theory, methods and applications. Springer, 370 pagesGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bendsoe M (1995) Optimization of structural topology, shape and material. SpringerGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Seepersad CC (2004) A robust topological preliminary design exploration method with materials design applications. Doctoral dissertation. Georgia Institute of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chang KH, Tang PS (2001) Integration of design and manufacturing for structural shape optimization. Adv Eng Softw 32(7):555–567CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Leary M, Merli L, Torti F, Mazur M, Brandt M (2014) Optimal topology for additive manufacture: a method for enabling additive manufacture of support-free optimal structures. Mater Des 63:678–690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Leary M, Babaee M, Brandt M, Subic A (2013) Feasible build orientations for self-supporting fused deposition manufacture: a novel approach to space filling tessellated geometries. Adv Mater Res 633:148–168 Trans Tech Publications, SwitzerlandCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chahine G, Smith P, Kovacevic R (2010) Application of topology optimization in modern additive manufacturing. In: Solid freeform fabrication symposium, Austin, TexasGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Doubrovski Z, Verlinden JC, Geraedts JM (2011) Optimal design for additive manufacturing: opportunities and challenges. In: ASME 2011 international design engineering technical conferences and computers and information in engineering conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, p.635–46Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sigmund O (2000) Topology optimization: a tool for the tailoring of structures and materials. Philos Trans R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 358(1765):211–227MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jakiela MJ, Chapman C, Duda J, Adewuya A, Saitou K (2000) Continuum structural topology design with genetic algorithms. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 186(2):339–356MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pedersen P, Pedersen NL (2006) Reflections on truss and continuum topology optimal designs. In: IUTAM symposium on topological design optimization of structures, machines and materials. Netherlands: Springer, p. 67–76.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Michell AGM (1904) LVIII. The limits of economy of material in frame-structures. London Edinburgh Dublin Philos Mag J Sci 8(47):589–597CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Eschenauer HA, Olhoff N (2001) Topology optimization of continuum structures: a review. Appl Mech Rev 54(4):331–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bendsoe M, Kikuchi N (1988) Generating optimal topologies in structural design using a homogenization method. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 71(2):197–224MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Suzuki K, Kikuchi N (1991) A homogenization method for shape and topology optimization. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 93(3):291–318CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bendsoe MP (1989) Optimal shape design as a material distribution problem. Struct Optim 1(4):193–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Zhou M, Rozvany GIN (1991) The COC algorithm, Part II: topological, geometrical and generalized shape optimization. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 89(1):309–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Rozvany GIN (2001) Aims, scope, methods, history and unified terminology of computer-aided topology optimization in structural mechanics. Struct Multidiscipl Optim 21(2):90–108MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    (2012) Components for rocket engines. In: Ti 2011—Proceedings of the 12th world conference on titanium, vol. 3, Beijing, China, p. 1715–8.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Brandt M, Sun S, Leary M, Feih S, Elambasseril J, Liu Q (2013) High-value SLM aerospace components: from design to manufacture. Adv Mater Res 633:135–147 Trans Tech Publications, SwitzerlandCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Cooper DE, Stanford M, Kibble KA, Gibbons GJ (2012) Additive manufacturing for product improvement at Red Bull Technology. Mater Des 41:226–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wohlers T (2012) Additive manufacturing and 3D printing—state of the industry. In: Wohlers Report 2012. Annual worldwide progress reportGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Gardana N, Schneider A Topological optimization of internal patterns and support in additive manufacturing, Journal of Manufacturing Systems, article in pressGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    HyperWorks User ManualGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    The Data Warehouse Toolkit, second edition (Wiley), Hoepli, Kimball Ralph, Ross Margy 2003.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kanellos A (2007) Topological self-organisation: using a particle-spring system simulation to generate structural space-filling lattices University College LondonGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Hanna S, Haroun Mahdavi S Modularity and flexibility at the small scale: evolving continuous material variation with stereolithography ACADIA: New Materials and New Industry.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Teresa Primo
    • 1
  • Maurizio Calabrese
    • 1
  • Antonio Del Prete
    • 1
  • Alfredo Anglani
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Engineering InnovationUniversità del SalentoLecceItaly

Personalised recommendations