Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Modeling and optimization of turning process parameters during the cutting of polymer (POM C) based on RSM, ANN, and DF methods

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present work concerns an experimental study dealing with cutting parameters’ effects on the surface roughness, cutting force, cutting power, and productivity during turning of the polyoxymethylene (POM C) polymer. For that, a cutting tool made of cemented carbide was used. The work is divided into three steps. The first one deals with unifactorial tests, where the evolution of the machining parameters (roughness criteria, cutting force components, and cutting power) is investigated by varying cutting speed, feed rater, and depth of cut. The second part concerns the modeling of the output parameters: arithmetic roughness, cutting force, cutting speed, and material removal rate by using the results of a full factorial design (L27). The second step concerns the adoption of the two modeling techniques, which are the response surface methodology (RSM) and the artificial neural network (ANN). The obtained results related to two both techniques are compared in order to discern the most efficient one. The last step of the present research work concerns the multi-objective optimization using the desirability function (DF). The optimization was carried out according to three approaches, which are the “quality optimization,” “productivity optimization,” and the combination between the quality and productivity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jiang Q, Zhang LC, Pittolo M (2000) The dependence of surface finish of a spectacle polymer upon machining conditions. Progress of Machining Technology. Aviation Industry Press, Beijing, pp. 7–12

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dusunceli N, Colak OU (2008) The effects of manufacturing techniques on visco-elastic and viscoplastic behavior of high density polyethylene (HDPE). Mater Design 29:1117–1124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bestared M (2006) Etude de la durabilité de pièces thermoplastiques. Application au polyoxyméthylène, thèse de doctorat à l’E.N.S.A.M, École Nationale Supérieure d’Arts et Métiers, Centre de Paris

  4. Yallese MA, Boulanouar L, Chaoui K (2004) Usinage de l’acier 100Cr6 trempé par un outil en nitrure de bore cubique. Mécanique & Industries 5:355–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hessainia Z, Yallese MA, Chaoui K, Mabrouki T, Rigal JF (2013) On the prediction of surface roughness in the hard turning based on cutting parameters and tool vibrations. Measurement 46:1671–1681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Azizi MW, Belhadi S, Yallese MA (2012) Surface roughness and cutting forces modeling for optimization of machining condition in finish hard turning of AISI 52100 steel. J Mech Sci Technol 26:4105–4114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bensouilah H, Aouici H, Meddour I, Yallese MA, Mabrouki T, Girardin F (2016) Performance of coated and uncoated mixed ceramic tools in hard turning process. Measurement 82:1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Aouici H, Yallese MA, Fnides B, Mabrouki T (2010) Machinability investigation in hard turning of AISI H11 hot work steel with CBN tool. MECHANIKA 86:1392–1207

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hessainia Z, Yallese MA, Bouzid L, Mabrouki T (2015) On the application of response surface methodology for predicting and optimizing surface roughness and cutting forces in hard turning by PVD coated insert. Int J Ind Eng Comput 6:267–284

    Google Scholar 

  10. Xiao KO, Zhang LC (2002) The role of viscous deformation in the machining of polymers. Int J Mech Sci (Pergamon) 44:2317–2336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Davim JP, Mata F (2007) A comparative evaluation of the turning of reinforced and unreinforced polyamide. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 33:911–914

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Keresztes, Kalacska, Zsidai, Dobrocsi (2011) Machinability of engineering polymers‖, Sustainable Construction and Design, pp. 106–114.

  13. Kaddeche M, Chaoui K, Yallese MA (2012) Cutting parameters effects on the machining of two high density polyethylene pipes resins. Mechanics & Industry 13:307–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Jagtap TU, Hemant AM (2015) Machining of plastics: a review. International Journal of Engineering and General Science 3:2091–2730

    Google Scholar 

  15. Panda MR, Biswal SK, Sharma YK (2016) Experimental analysis on the effect of process parameters during CNC turning on nylon-6/6 using tungsten carbide tool. International Journal of Engineering Sciences & Research Technology 5(4):2277–9655

    Google Scholar 

  16. Oktem H, Erzurumlu T, Erzincanli F (2006) Prediction of minimum surface roughness in end milling mold parts using neural network and genetic algorithm. Mater Des 27:735–744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gaitonde VN, Karnik SR, Mata F, Davim JP (2009) Modeling and analysis of machinability characteristics in PA6 and PA66GF30 polyamides through artificial neural network, Journal of Thermoplastic Composite Materials, Vol. 00-2009

  18. Lazarevic D, Madic M, Jankovic P, Lazarevic A (2011) Surface roughness minimization of polyamide PA-6 turning by Taguchi method. Journal of Production Engineering 15:1821–4932

    Google Scholar 

  19. Madic M, Marinkovic V, Radovanovic M (2012) Mathematical modeling and optimization of surface roughness in turning of polyamide based on artificial neural network. MECHANIKA 18:2029–6983

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Madic M, Markovic D, Radovanovic M (2012) Optimization of surface roughness when turning polyamide using ANN- IHSA approach. International Journal of Engineering and Technology 4:432–443

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bouzid L, Yallese MA, Chaoui K, Mabrouki T, Boulanouar L (2015) Mathematical modeling for turning on AISI 420 stainless steel using surface response methodology. Proc IMechE Part B: J Engineering Manufacture 229(1):45–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bouzid L, Boutabba S, Yallese MA, Belhadi S, François G (2014) Simultaneous optimization of surface roughness and material removal rate for turning of X20Cr13 stainless steel. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 74:879–891

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Meddour I, Yallese MA, Khattabi R, Elbah M, Boulanouar L (2014) Investigation and modeling of cutting forces and surface roughness when hard turning of AISI 52100 steel with mixed ceramic tool: cutting condition optimization. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 77:1387–1399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Aouici H, Bouchelaghem H, Yallese MA, Elbah M, Fnides B (2014) Machinability investigation in hard turning of AISI D3 cold work steel with ceramic tool using response methodology. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 73:1775–1788

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Vijaya MK, Chincholkar AM (2010) Effect of machining parameters on surface roughness and material removal rate in finish turning of ±30 glass fibre reinforced polymer pipes. Mater Des 31:3590–3598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ansari MS, Sharma D, Nikam S (2014) Study of cutting forces and surface roughness in turning of bronze filled polytetrafluoroethylene. International Journal of Advanced Mechanical Engineering 4:2250–3234

    Google Scholar 

  27. Yallese MA, Chaoui K, Zeghib N, Boulanouar L (2009) Hard machining of hardened bearing steel using cubic boron nitride tool. J Mater Process Technol 209:1092–1104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Harrington EC Jr (1965) the desirability function. Industrial Quality Control 21(10):494–498

    Google Scholar 

  29. Derringer G, Suich R (1980) Simultaneous optimization of several response variables. J Qual Technol 12:214–219

    Google Scholar 

  30. Aouici H, Yallese MA, Belbah A, Ameur MF, Elbah M (2013) Experimental investigation of cutting parameters influence on surface roughness and cutting forces in hard turning of X38CrMoV5-1 with CBN tool. Sadhana 38:429–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Mechanical Department, Structure and Mechanics Laboratory (LMS), University May 8, 1945, P.O. Box 401, 24000, Guelma, Algeria

    A. Chabbi, M.A. Yallese, M. Nouioua & I. Meddour

  2. ENIT, University of Tunis El Manar, Tunis, Tunisia

    T. Mabrouki

  3. Laboratoire Vibrations Acoustique, INSA-Lyon, 25 bis avenue Jean Capelle, 69621, Villeurbanne Cedex, France

    François Girardin

Authors
  1. A. Chabbi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M.A. Yallese
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M. Nouioua
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. I. Meddour
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. T. Mabrouki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. François Girardin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Chabbi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chabbi, A., Yallese, M., Nouioua, M. et al. Modeling and optimization of turning process parameters during the cutting of polymer (POM C) based on RSM, ANN, and DF methods. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 91, 2267–2290 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9858-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9858-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation