Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Integrated product-process design to suggest appropriate manufacturing technology: a review

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The materials and manufacturing processes are evolving very rapidly subject to today’s high performance, shorter lead times, and high part complexity needs. With over 80,000 materials, various manufacturing technologies (additive and traditional), diverse streams of application (aerospace, motor vehicles, health care, etc.), and high cost incurred due to manufacturability of the part, it has become essential to choose the right compromise of technology resource in early stages of design considering the Design for Manufacturing (DFM)/Design for Additive Manufacturing (DFAM) guidelines. The concerned literature to date focuses on manufacturing technology selection by being either part specific or application specific. As multiple criteria are involved for decision making, this paper provides a thorough review on the following questions: (1) What are the common design criteria used in literature for additive and traditional manufacturing technologies with respect to product-process integration? (2) What is the literature contribution for material and manufacturing process selection strategies with special focus on comparison of additive and traditional manufacturing technologies? The paper attempts to provide as a result a basic generic methodology for resource selection (RS) which will not only take into account all of the areas of application, DFM/DFAM guidelines, and three design criteria (function, cost, and environment), but will also discuss avenues for collaborative product development. A complex industrial case study is also presented to test the proposed methodology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Whitney DE (1988) Manufacturing by design. Harv Bus Rev 66(4):83–91

    Google Scholar 

  2. Budiono HDS, Kiswanto G, Soemardi TP (2014) Method and model development for manufacturing cost estimation during the early design phase related to the complexity of the machining processes. International Journal of Technology 2:183–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ranjan R, Samant R, Anand S (2015) Design for Manufacturability in Additive Manufacturing using Graph Based Approach. Proceedings of ASME 2015 International Manufacturing Science and Engineering Conference, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA, pp. V001T02A069, doi:10.1115/MSEC2015-9448

  4. Loch C, Terwiesch C (2000) Product development and concurrent engineering. Encyclopedia of Production and Manufacturing Management 16:567–575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Marx WJ, Mavris DN, Schrage DP (1994) Integrating Design and Manufacturing for a High Speed Civil Transport Wing. Presented at the 19th ICAS/AIAA Aircraft Systems Conference, Anaheim, CA

  6. Yang S, Zhao YF (2015) Additive manufacturing-enabled design theory and methodology: a critical review. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. doi:10.1007/s00170-015-6994-5

    Google Scholar 

  7. Tang X, Bassir DH, Zhang W (2011) Shape, sizing optimization and material selection based on mixed variables and genetic algorithm. Journal of Optimization Engineering 12:111–128

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Farag MM (2002) Quantitative Methods of Material Selection. In: Mechanical Engineers’ Handbook: Materials and Mechanical Design, 3rd edn. doi:10.1002/0471777447.ch14

  9. ASTM (2012) Standard Terminology for Additive Manufacturing Technologies, Standard F2792-12a, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2012, doi:10.1520/F2792-10, www.astm.org

  10. Kuo TC, Huang SH, Zhang HC (2001) Design for Manufacture and Design for ‘X’: concepts, applications and perspectives. Journal of Computers and Industrial Engineering 41:241–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hague R, Mansour S, Saleh N (2003) Design opportunities with rapid manufacturing. Journal of Assembly Automation 23(4):346–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hopkinson N, Dickens P (2006) Emerging rapid manufacturing processes. In: Rapid manufacturing-an industrial revolution for the digital age. Wiley, Chichester, pp. 55–80

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Horn TJ, Harrysson OLA (2012) Overview of current additive manufacturing technologies and selected applications. Journal of Science Progress 95(3):255–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kerbrat O, Mognol P, Hascoet JV (2011) A new DFM approach to combine machining and additive manufacturing. Journal of Computers in Industry 62(7):684–692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hague R, Mansour S, Saleh N (2004) Material and design considerations for rapid manufacturing. Int J Prod Res 42(22):4691–4708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Atzeni E, Iuliano L, Minetola P, Salmi A (2010) Redesign and cost estimation of rapid manufactured plastic parts. Rapid Prototyp J 16(5):308–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Cotteleer M, Holdowsky J, Mahto M (2013) The 3D opportunity primer: the basics of additive manufacturing, a Deloitte series on additive manufacturing. Deloitte University Press, Westlake

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sharon F (2014) Additive manufacturing technology: potential implications for U.S. manufacturing competitiveness. Journal of International Commerce and Economics 6(1):41–74

    Google Scholar 

  19. Giachetti RE (1997) A decision support system for material and manufacturing process selection. J Intell Manuf 9:265–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Jahan A, Ismail MY, Sapuan SM, Mustapha F (2010) Material screening and choosing methods – a review. Journal of Materials and Design 31:696–705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Deng YM, Edwards KL (2007) The role of materials identification and selection in engineering design. Journal of Materials and Design 28:131–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wright IC (1998) Design methods in engineering and product design. McGraw-Hill, London

    Google Scholar 

  23. Gibson I, Rosen D, Stucker B (2015) Additive manufacturing technologies: 3D printing, rapid prototyping, and direct digital manufacturing, 2nd edn. Springer, New York Heidelberg Dordrecht London ISBN: 978-1-4939-2112-6

    Book  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhang L, Luo Y, Tao F, Li BH, Ren L, Zhang X, Guo H, Cheng Y, Hu A, Liu Y (2012) Cloud manufacturing: a new manufacturing paradigm. Enterprise Information Systems. doi:10.1080/17517575.2012.683812

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Farag MM (2014) Materials and process selection for engineering design. Taylor and Francis Group, Boca Raton ISBN: 978-1-4665-6410-7

    Google Scholar 

  26. Quan W, Jianmin H (2006) A study on collaborative mechanism for product design in distributed concurrent engineering. IEEE. doi:10.1109/CAIDCD.2006.329445

    Google Scholar 

  27. Balaji S, Murugaiyan MS (2012) Waterfall vs V-model vs agile: a comparative study on SDLC. International Journal of Information Technology and Business Management 2(1):26–30

    Google Scholar 

  28. Royce W (1970) Managing the development of large software systems. Proceedings of IEEE WESCON 26:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  29. Tichkiewitch S, Veron M (1998) Integration of manufacturing processes in design. CIRP Annals–Manufacturing Technology 47(1):99–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Thibault A, Siadat A, Sadeghi M, Bigot R, Martin P (2008) Knowledge formalization for product-process integration applied to forging domain. International Journal for Advanced Manufacturing Technology 44:1116–1132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Skander A, Roucoules L, Klein Meyer JS (2008) Design and manufacturing Interface modelling for manufacturing processes selection and knowledge synthesis in design. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 37(5–6):443–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Roucoules L, Skander A (2003) Manufacturing Process Selection and Integration in Product Design: Analysis and Synthesis Approaches. Proceeding of the 2003 CIRP Design Seminar, Grenoble, France

  33. Bernard A, Perry N, Delplace JC, Gabriel S (2003) Quotation for the Value Added Assessment during Product Development and Production Processes. Proceeding of the 2003 CIRP Design Seminar, Grenoble, France

  34. Klahn C, Leutenecker B, Meboldt M (2015) Design strategies for the process of additive manufacturing. Procedia CIRP 36:230–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Klahn C, Leutenecker B, Meboldt M (2014) Design for Additive Manufacturing–Supporting the substitution of components in series products. Procedia CIRP 21:138–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Boivie K, Sorby K, Brotan V, Ystgaard P (2011) Development of a hybrid manufacturing cell; integration of additive manufacturing with CNC machining. In: 22nd annual international solid freeform fabrication symposium–an additive manufacturing conference. The University of Texas, Austin, pp. 153–163

    Google Scholar 

  37. Ponche R, Kerbrat O, Mognol P, Hascoet JV (2014) A novel methodology of Design for Additive Manufacturing applied to additive laser manufacturing process. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 30:389–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. D’Antonio G, Segonds F, Bedolla JS, Chiabert P, Anwer N (2016) A proposal of manufacturing execution system integration in design for additive manufacturing. Product Lifecycle Management in the Era of Internet of Things: IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology 467:761–770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Rosen DW (2007) Computer-aided Design for Additive Manufacturing of cellular structures. Computer Aided Design and Applications 4(5):585–594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Shercliff HR, Lovatt AM (2001) Selection of manufacturing processes in design and the role of process modelling. Journal of Progress in Materials Science 46:429–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Ashby MF (2005) Materials selection in mechanical design, 3rd edn. Butterworth-Heinemann Linacre House, Jordan Hill, Oxford, UK ISBN: 0-7506-6168-2

    Google Scholar 

  42. Ashby MF, Cebon D, Silva A (2012) Teaching Engineering Materials: CES EduPack, Granta Teaching Resources, © Granta Design

  43. Tang Y, Hascoet JY, Zhao YF (2014) Integration of Topological and Functional Optimization in Design for Additive Manufacturing. Proceedings of the ASME 2014 12th Biennial Conference on Engineering Systems Design and Analysis, ESDA2014–20381, p 1–8

  44. Ponche R, Kerbrat O, Mognol P, Hascoet JV (2012) Consideration of the Manufacturing Trajectories in a Global Design for Additive Manufacturing Methodology. Proceedings of the ASME 2012 11th Biennial Conference on Engineering Systems Design and Analysis, Nantes, France, p 745–754

  45. Bendsoe MP, Kikuchi N (1988) Generating optimal topologies in structural design using a homogenization method. Journal of Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 71(2):197–224

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  46. Bendsoe MP, Ben-Tal A, Zowe J (1994) Optimization methods for truss geometry and topology design. Journal of Structural Optimization 7(3):141–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Dorn WS, Gomory RE, Greenberg HJ (1964) Automatic Design of Optimal Structures. Journal de Mecanique 3(1):25–52

    Google Scholar 

  48. Xie Y, Steven GP (1993) A simple evolutionary procedure for structural optimization. Comput Struct 49(5):885–896

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Young V, Querin O, Steven G, Xie Y (1999) 3D and multiple load case Bi-directional evolutionary structural optimization (BESO). Journal of Structural and Multi-Disciplinary Optimization 18(2–3):183–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Rozvany GIN, Zhou M, Birker T (1992) Generalized shape optimization without homogenization. Journal of Structural and Multi-Disciplinary Optimization 4:250–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Wang SY, Tai K (2005) Structural topology design optimization using genetic algorithms with a bit-Array representation. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 194(36–38):3749–3770

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  52. Chen Z, Gao L, Qiu H, Shao X (2009) Combining Genetic Algorithms with Optimality Criteria Method for Topology Optimization. In: Proceedings of Bio-Inspired Computing, BICTA'09, IEEE, p 1–6

  53. Wang H, Rosen DW (2002) Parametric Modeling Method for Truss Structures. Proceedings of 2002 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, DETC02/CIE-34495, Atlanta, USA, p 759–767

  54. Chen Y (2007) 3D texture mapping for rapid manufacturing. Computer Aided Design & Applications 4(6):761–771

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Muller P, Mognol P, Hascoet JY (2013) Modeling and control of a direct laser powder deposition process for functionally graded materials (FGM) parts manufacturing. J Mater Process Technol 213(5):685–692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Vayre B, Vignat F, Villeneuve F (2012) Designing for additive manufacturing. 45th CIRP Conference on Manufacturing Systems 3:632–637

    Google Scholar 

  57. Hopkinson N, Dickens P (2003) Analysis of rapid manufacturing-using layer manufacturing processes for production. Proc Inst Mech Eng C J Mech Eng Sci 217(1):31–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Ruffo M, Tuck C, Hague R (2006) Cost estimation for rapid manufacturing–laser sintering production for low to medium volumes. J Eng Manuf 220:1417–1427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Lindemann C, Jahnke U, Moi M, Koch R (2012) Analyzing Product Lifecycle Costs for a Better Understanding of Cost Drivers in Additive Manufacturing. In 23rd Annual International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium–An Additive Manufacturing Conference, Austin, USA

  60. Atzeni E, Salmi A (2012) Economics of additive manufacturing for end-usable metal parts. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 62:1147–1155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Allen J (2006) An Investigation into the Comparative Costs of Additive Manufacture vs. Machine from Solid for Aero Engine Parts. In Cost Effective Manufacture via Net-Shape Processing, Meeting Proceedings RTO-MP-AVT-139, 17, p 17–1–17-10

  62. Huang SH, Liu P, Mokasdar A, Hou L (2013) Additive manufacturing and its societal impact: a literature review. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 67:1191–1203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Telenko C, Seepersad CC (2012) A comparison of the energy efficiency of selective laser sintering and injection molding of nylon parts. Rapid Prototyp J 18(6):472–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Mognol P, Lepicart D, Perry N (2006) Rapid prototyping: energy and environment in the spotlight. Rapid Prototyp J 12(1):26–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Kranz J, Herzog D, Emmelmann C (2015) Design guidelines for laser additive manufacturing of light-weight structures in TiAl6V4. Journal of Laser Applications 27:S14001-1-16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Seepersad CC, Govett T, Kim K, Lundin M, Pinero D (2012) A Designer's Guide for Dimensioning and Tolerancing SLS Parts. 23rd Annual International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium-An Additive Manufacturing Conference, p 921–931

  67. Caramia M, Dell’Olmo P (2008) Multi-objective Management in Freight Logistics: Increasing Capacity, Service Level and Safety with Optimization Algorithms. Springer–Verlag London Limited, ISBN: 978–1–84800-381-1

  68. Ashby MF (1999) Multi-objective optimization in material design and selection. Journal of Acta Materialia 48:359–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Zhou CC, Yin GF, Hu XB (2009) Multi-objective optimization of material selection for sustainable products: artificial neural networks and genetic algorithm approach. Journal of Material Design 30:1209–1215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Shi P (2005) Neural network approach to material selection for injection molded parts. Harbin Gongye Daxue Xuebao/J, Harbin Institute of Technology 37

  71. Ramadan SZ (2016) Binary programming for manufacturing material and manufacturing process selection using genetic algorithms. International Journal of Mechanical, Aerospace, Industrial, Mechatronic and Manufacturing Engineering 10:243–246

    Google Scholar 

  72. Sakundarini N, Taha Z, Rashid SHA, Ghazilla RA (2013) Multi-objective optimization for high recyclability material selection using genetic algorithm. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 68:1441–1451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Farag MM, El-Magd E (1992) An integrated approach to product design, materials selection and cost estimation. Journal of Material Design 13:323–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Najafi A, Rais-Rohani M (2012) Concurrent Process-Product Design Optimization using Coupled Non-Linear Finite Element Simulations. In: Dr. Farzad Ebrahimi (ed) Finite Element Analysis-Applications in Mechanical Engineering. InTech. doi:10.5772/47852

  75. modeFRONTIER (2008) Multi-objective Optimization and Decision Making Process in Engineering Design. modeFRONTIER Special Issue, Newsletter EnginSoft, Downloaded from http://www.enginsoft.com/assets/img/tecnology/pido/MULTIOBJECTIVE_newsletter08-eng.pdf.

  76. Rao RV, Davim JP (2008) A decision-making framework model for material selection using a combined multiple attribute decision making method. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 35:751–760

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Khabbaz RS, Manshadi BD, Abedian A, Mahmudi R (2009) A simplified fuzzy logic approach for materials selection in mechanical engineering design. Journal of Materials and Design 30:687–697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Maleque MA, Dyuti S (2010) Materials selection of a bicycle frame using cost per unit property property and digital logic methods. International Journal of Mechanical and Materials Engineering 5(1):95–100

    Google Scholar 

  79. Ashby MF (2009) Material and Process Charts. The CES EduPack Resource Booklet 2, © Granta Design

  80. Berman AF, Maltugueva GS, Yurin AY (2015) Application of Case-Based Reasoning and Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods for Material Selection in Petrochemistry. Journal of Materials, Design and Applications 1–9

  81. Chen RW, Navin-Chandra D, Nair I, Prinz F, Wadehra IL (1995) ImSelection–An Approach for Material Selection that Integrates Mechanical Design and Lifecycle Environment Burdens. In: Anon (ed) IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment, Orlando, FL, USA, p 68–74

  82. Kumar S, Singh R (2007) An intelligent system for modeling and material selection for progressive die components. Journal of Key Engineering Materials 344:873–880

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Kesteren VIEH, Stappers PJ, De Bruijn JCM (2007) Materials in product selection: tools for including user-interaction in materials selection. International Journal of Design 1(3):41–55

    Google Scholar 

  84. Ipek M, Selvi IH, Findik F, Torkul O, Cedimoglu IH (2013) An expert system based material selection approach to manufacturing. Journal of Materials and Design 47:331–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Zha XF (2005) A web-based advisory system for process and material selection in concurrent product design for a manufacturing environment. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 25:233–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Rao RV (2013) Decision Making in the Manufacturing Environment Using Graph Theory and Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making Methods. Springer Series in Advanced Manufacturing. doi:10.1007/978-1-4471-4375-8_2

  87. Gupta S, Dangayach GS, Singh AK, Rao PN (2015) Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) model for evaluating sustainable manufacturing practices in Indian electrical panel industries. Procedia–Social and Behavioral Sciences 189:208–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Desai S, Bidanda B, Lovell MR (2012) Material and process selection in product design using decision making technique (AHP). European Journal of Industrial Engineering 6(3):322–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Armillotta A (2007) Selection of layered manufacturing techniques by an adaptive AHP decision model. Journal of Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 24:450–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Singh S, Olugu EU, Musa SN, Mahat AB, Wong KY (2015) Strategy selection for sustainable manufacturing with integrated AHP-VIKOR method under interval-valued fuzzy environment. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. doi:10.1007/s00170-015-7553-9

    Google Scholar 

  91. Milani AS, Shanian A (2006) A gear material selection with uncertain and incomplete data: material performance indices and decision aid model. Int J Mech Mater Des 3:209–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. Chakladar ND, Chakraborty S (2008) A combined TOPSIS-AHP-method-based approach for non-traditional machining processes selection. J Eng Manuf 222:1613–1623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. Shanian A, Savadogo O (2006) A non-compensatory compromised solution for material selection of bipolar plates for polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) using ELECTRE IV. Journal of Electrochimica Acta 56:5037–5015

    Google Scholar 

  94. Shanian A, Milani AS, Carcon C, Abeyarante RC (2008) A new application of ELECTRE III and revised SIMO’s procedure of group material selection under weighting uncertainty. Journal of Knowledge Based Systems 21:709–720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Jahan A, Mustapha F, Sapuan SM (2012) A framework for weighting of criteria in ranking stage of material selection process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 58:411–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. Khoda AKMB, Koc B (2013) Functionally heterogeneous porous scaffold Design for Tissue Engineering. CAD Computer Aided Design 45(11):1276–1293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. Podshivalov L, Gomes CM, Zocca A, Guenster J, Bar-Yoseph P, Fischer A (2013) Design, analysis and additive manufacturing of porous structures for biocompatible microscale scaffolds. Procedia CIRP 5:247–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  98. Sroufe R, Curkovic S, Montabon F, Melnyk SA (2000) The new product design process and Design for Environment. International Journal of Operations and Production Management 20(2):267–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. Adam GAO, Zimmer D (2014) Design for Additive Manufacturing-Element Transitions and Aggregated Structures. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol 7(4):20–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Laboratoire de Conception Fabrication Commande (LCFC), Ecole Nationale Supérieure d’Arts et Métiers (ENSAM), Metz Technopole, 4, Rue Augustin Fresnel, 57078, Metz Cedex 3, France

    Uzair Khaleeq uz Zaman, Ali Siadat & Mickael Rivette

  2. College of Electrical and Mechanical Engineering (CEME), National University of Sciences and Technology (NUST), Rawalpindi, Pakistan

    Uzair Khaleeq uz Zaman & Aamer Ahmed Baqai

  3. School of Mechanical Engineering and Automation, Beihang University (BUAA), Beijing, China

    Lihong Qiao

Authors
  1. Uzair Khaleeq uz Zaman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ali Siadat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mickael Rivette
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Aamer Ahmed Baqai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Lihong Qiao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Uzair Khaleeq uz Zaman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khaleeq uz Zaman, U., Siadat, A., Rivette, M. et al. Integrated product-process design to suggest appropriate manufacturing technology: a review. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 91, 1409–1430 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9765-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9765-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation