Advertisement

Effect of sample size on the performance of Shewhart control charts

  • Salah Haridy
  • Ahmed Maged
  • Saleh Kaytbay
  • Sherif Araby
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Abstract

The control chart is one of the most powerful techniques in statistical process control (SPC) to monitor processes and ensure quality. The sample size n plays a critical role in the overall performance of any control chart. This article studies the effect of n on the performance of Shewhart control charts, which have traditionally been used for monitoring both the mean and variance of a variable (e.g., the diameter of a shaft and the temperature of a surface). The study is conducted under different combinations of false alarm rate and process shift. The detection speed of the Shewhart charts is evaluated in terms of average extra quadratic loss (AEQL) which is a measure of the overall performance. It is found that n = 2 is the best sample size of the Shewhart \( \overset{\_}{\boldsymbol{X}}\&\boldsymbol{R} \) and \( \overset{\_}{\boldsymbol{X}}\&\boldsymbol{S} \) charts. The comparative study reveals that the \( \overset{\_}{\boldsymbol{X}}\&\boldsymbol{R} \) and \( \overset{\_}{\boldsymbol{X}}\&\boldsymbol{S} \) charts with n = 2 outperform the \( \overset{\_}{\boldsymbol{X}}\&\boldsymbol{R} \) and \( \overset{\_}{\boldsymbol{X}}\&\boldsymbol{S} \) charts with n ≥ 4 by at least 9 and 7 %, respectively, in terms of AEQL. These results contradict the common knowledge in SPC niche that n between 4 and 6 is usually recommended for the \( \overset{\_}{\boldsymbol{X}}\&\boldsymbol{R} \) and \( \overset{\_}{\boldsymbol{X}}\&\boldsymbol{S} \) charts.

Keywords

Statistical process control Shewhart chart Average extra quadratic loss 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Montgomery DC (2013) Introduction to statistical quality control. John Wiley & Sons, New YorkzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Haridy S, Gouda SA, Wu Z (2011) An integrated framework of statistical process control and design of experiments for optimizing wire electrochemical turning process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 53(1–4):191–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Castagliola P, Celano G, Fichera S, Nenes G (2013) The variable sample size t control chart for monitoring short production runs. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 66(9–12):1353–1366Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Azam M, Aslam M, Jun C-H (2015) Designing of a hybrid exponentially weighted moving average control chart using repetitive sampling. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 77(9–12):1927–1933CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Costa AF, De Magalhaes MS (2007) An adaptive chart for monitoring the process mean and variance. Qual Reliab Eng Int 23(7):821–831CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Reynolds MR, Stoumbos ZG (1998) The SPRT chart for monitoring a proportion. IIE Trans 30(6):545–561Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Domangue R, Patch SC (1991) Some omnibus exponentially weighted moving average statistical process monitoring schemes. Technometrics 33(3):299–313CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wu Z, Tian Y (2005) Weighted-loss-function CUSUM chart for monitoring mean and variance of a production process. Int J Prod Res 43(14):3027–3044CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wu Z, Yang M, Khoo MB, Yu F-J (2010) Optimization designs and performance comparison of two CUSUM schemes for monitoring process shifts in mean and variance. Eur J Oper Res 205(1):136–150MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Costa AF, de Magalhães MS, Epprecht EK (2009) Monitoring the process mean and variance using a synthetic control chart with two-stage testing. Int J Prod Res 47(18):5067–5086CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Arnold JC, Reynolds M (2001) CUSUM control charts with variable sample sizes and sampling intervals. J Qual Technol 33(1):66–81Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Luo H, Wu Z (2002) Optimal np control charts with variable sample sizes or variable sampling intervals. Economic Quality Control 17(1):39–61MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Celano G, Costa A, Fichera S (2006) Statistical design of variable sample size and sampling interval\bar X control charts with run rulescontrol charts with run rules. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 28(9–10):966–977CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kaya I (2009) A genetic algorithm approach to determine the sample size for attribute control charts. Inf Sci 179(10):1552–1566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wu Z, Yang M, Khoo MB, Castagliola P (2011) What are the best sample sizes for the Xbar and CUSUM charts? Int J Prod Econ 131(2):650–662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Haridy S, Wu Z, Lee KM, Bhuiyan N (2013) Optimal average sample number of the SPRT chart for monitoring fraction nonconforming. Eur J Oper Res 229(2):411–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Reynolds MR, Arnold JC (2001) EWMA control charts with variable sample sizes and variable sampling intervals. IIE Trans 33(6):511–530Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lee P-H, Chang Y-C, Torng C-C (2012) A design of S control charts with a combined double sampling and variable sampling interval scheme. Communications in Statistics-Theory and Methods 41(1):153–165CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Reynolds MR Jr, Stoumbos ZG (2004) Control charts and the efficient allocation of sampling resources. Technometrics 46(2):200–214MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wu Z, Xie M, Tian Y (2002) Optimization design of the X & S charts for monitoring process capability. J Manuf Syst 21(2):83–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Montgomery DC, Woodall W (1999) Research issues and ideas in statistical process control. J Qual Technol 31(4):376–387Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Reynolds MR, Amin RW, Arnold JC (1990) CUSUM charts with variable sampling intervals. Technometrics 32(4):371–384MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Khoo MB, Tan EK, Chong ZL, Haridy S (2015) Side-sensitive group runs double sampling (SSGRDS) chart for detecting mean shifts. International Journal of Production Research (ahead-of-print):1–19Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sparks RS (2000) CUSUM charts for signalling varying location shifts. J Qual Technol 32(2):157Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ou Y, Wu Z, Tsung F (2012) A comparison study of effectiveness and robustness of control charts for monitoring process mean. Int J Prod Econ 135(1):479–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Taguchi G, Wu Y (1980) Introduction to off-line quality control. Central Japan Quality Control Association, Nagoya, pp. 49–67Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Shamsuzzaman M, Khoo M, Haridy S, Alsyouf I (2014) An optimization design of the 3-EWMA scheme for monitoring mean shifts. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 74(5–8):1061–1076CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Haridy S, Wu Z, Abhary K, Castagliola P, Shamsuzzaman M (2014) Development of a multiattribute synthetic-np chart. J Stat Comput Simul 84(9):1884–1903MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Salah Haridy
    • 1
    • 2
  • Ahmed Maged
    • 1
  • Saleh Kaytbay
    • 1
  • Sherif Araby
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Benha Faculty of EngineeringBenha UniversityBenhaEgypt
  2. 2.H. Milton Stewart School of Industrial and Systems EngineeringGeorgia Institute of TechnologyAtlantaUSA
  3. 3.School of EngineeringUniversity of South AustraliaMawson LakesAustralia

Personalised recommendations