Establishing a theoretical model for abrasive removal depth of silicon wafer chemical mechanical polishing by integrating a polishing times analytical model and specific down force energy theory
- 117 Downloads
This study uses the polishing pad with cross pattern, and it is supposed that the contact area between polishing pad surface of cross pattern and wafer is Gaussian distribution to establish and analyze an innovative abrasive removal depth theoretical model of chemical mechanical polishing (CMP) silicon wafer. In this model, it uses the binary image pixel division to calculate polishing times and it derives the contact force of each abrasive particle and uses the specific down force energy (SDFE) theoretical equation to calculate the abrasive removal depth on each abrasive particle after down force being applied. This study carries out CMP silicon wafer experiment as well as atomic force microscopy (AFM) measurement experiment of SDFE of silicon wafer. The abrasive removal depth of silicon wafer acquired from simulation analysis is compared with the abrasive removal depth of silicon wafer obtained from CMP experiment of silicon wafer, and the difference in between will also be analyzed. It shows that the difference between the results of simulation and experiment is in the acceptable range.
KeywordsSilicon wafer Chemical mechanical polishing Specific down force energy Abrasive removal depth Polishing times
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 4.Preston FW (1927) The theory and design of plate glass polishing machines. J Soc Glass Technology 11:214–247Google Scholar
- 10.Lin ZC, Chen CC (2005) Method for analyzing effective polishing frequency and times for chemical mechanical planarization polishing wafer with different polishing pad profiles. Journal of the Chinese Society of Mechanical Engineers 26:671–676Google Scholar
- 17.Yu T, Yu C, Orlowski M (1993) A statistical polishing pad model for chemical-mechanical polishing. Proceedings of the 1993 InternationalElectron Devices Meetings, IEEE, Washington DC, pp 865–868Google Scholar