Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of vibration amplitude and relative grain size on the rheological behavior of copper during ultrasonic-assisted microextrusion

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ultrasonic-assisted microextrusion tests were performed on pure copper (Cu) with different amplitudes and dimensions to investigate the effects of amplitude and relative grain size L/D (i.e., the ratio of initial grain size L to dimension after extrusion D) on its rheological behavior. The ratio of average extrusion height H to dimension after extrusion D was used as a microformability evaluation parameter. Results showed that the extrusion stress, friction coefficient, and microhardness of Cu decrease with increasing vibration amplitude, whereas its microformability, surface quality, and deformation temperature increase. The effect of relative grain size on microformability could be divided into three sections under different amplitudes. Microformability decreases with increasing L/D when L/D ≤ 0.15 but gradually increases when L/D > 0.35. When 0.15 < L/D ≤ 0.35, experimental repeatability was the poorest and microformability was the worst among the three sections. Moreover, the results of the X-ray diffraction experiment indicated that ultrasonic vibration could effectively promote grain rotation to the (1 1 1) preferred orientation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chan WL, Fu MW, Lu J (2011b) The size effect on micro deformation behaviour in micro-scale plastic deformation. Mater Des 32:198–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chan WL, Fu MW (2012) Experimental studies of plastic deformation behaviors in microheading process. J Mater Process Technol 212:1501–1512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wang CJ, Shan DB, Zhou J, Guo B, Sun LN (2007) Size effects of the cavity dimension on the microforming ability during coining process. J Mater Process Technol 187–188:256–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Blaha F, Langenecker B (1955) Elongation of zinc monocrystals under ultrasonic action. Die Natur Wissenschafen 42:556–563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ashida Y, Aoyama H (2007) Press forming using ultrasonic vibration. J Mater Process Technol 187–188:118–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mousavi SAAA, Feizi H, Madoliat R (2007) Investigations on the effects of ultrasonic vibrations in the extrusion process. J Mater Process Technol 187–188:657–661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Liu Y, Suslov S, Han QY, Xu C, Hua L (2012) Microstructure of the pure copper produced by upsetting with ultrasonic vibration. Mater Lett 67:52–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhong ZW, Lin G (2006) Ultrasonic assisted turning of an aluminium-based metal matrix composite reinforced with SiC particles. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 27:1077–1081

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hung JC, Tsai YC (2013) Investigation of the effects of ultrasonic vibration-assisted micro-upsetting on brass. Mater Sci Eng A 580:125–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bunget C, Ngaile G (2011) Influence of ultrasonic vibration on micro-extrusion. Ultrasonics 51:606–616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Liu YX, Suslov S, Han QY, Hua L, Xu C (2013) Comparison between ultrasonic vibration-assisted upsetting and conventional upsetting. Metall Mater Trans A 44:3232–3244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sondur SR, Pawar SV, Salunke SA, Salunke SR, Patil SB (2015) A model for deformation in high energy rate micro forming process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 76:189–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Siegert K, Mock A (1996) Wire drawing with ultrasonically oscillating dies. J Mater Process Technol 60:657–660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Yao ZH, Kim GY, Wang ZH, Faidley LA, Zou QZ, Mei DQ, Chen ZC (2012) Acoustic softening and residual hardening in aluminium: modeling and experiments. Int J Plast 39:75–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Siddiq A, Sayed TE (2011) Acoustic softening in metals during ultrasonic assisted deformation via CP-FEM. Mater Lett 65:356–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Siddiq A, Sayed TE (2012) Ultrasonic-assisted manufacturing processes: variational model and numerical simulation. Ultrasonics 52:521–529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chan WL, Fu MW, Yang B (2011a) Study of size effect in micro-extrusion process of pure copper. Mater Des 32:3772–3782

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gu M, Yang FZ, Huang L, Yao SB, Zhou SM (2002) XRD study on highly preferred orientation Cu electrodeposit. Electrochemistry 8:282–287

    Google Scholar 

  19. Krishnan N, Cao J, Dohda K (2006) Study of the size effect on friction conditions in microextrusion—part I: microextrusion experiments and analysis. J Manuf Sci Eng 129(8):669–676

    Google Scholar 

  20. Parasiz SA, Kinsey BL, Mahayatsanun N, Cao J (2011) Effect of specimen size and grain size on deformation in microextrusion. J Manuf Process 13:153–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Y. Lou.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lou, Y., He, J., Chen, H. et al. Effects of vibration amplitude and relative grain size on the rheological behavior of copper during ultrasonic-assisted microextrusion. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 89, 2421–2433 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9288-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9288-7

Keywords

Navigation