Skip to main content
Log in

An integrated holistic model of a complex process

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Conducting experiments to understand and model a complex process or system is usually costly and time-consuming due to multistages, multivariables, and multidisciplinary issues involved in the complex process. To reduce the complexity, for a single experiment, experimenters often fix some variables and investigate the effects of a smaller subset of variables. If then, it is possible to build individual models for each subset of variables, but this only allows partial understanding of the whole process. In this paper, we propose a method for building a holistic model of a complex process using multiple partial models that are learned from multiple sub-experiments that focus on different variables or the same variables but with different variable ranges. Using the proposed holistic model, it should be possible to provide an initial understanding of the complex process involving all variables. The effectiveness of the proposed method is demonstrated using a real example from a buckypaper process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aldalbahi A, Panhuis M (2012) Electrical and mechanical characteristics of buckypapers and evaporative cast films prepared using single and multi-walled carbon nanotubes and the biopolymer carrageenan. Carbon 50:1197–1208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Baughman RH, Zakhidov AA, de Heer WA (2002) Carbon nanotubes—the route toward applications. Science 297:787–792

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Casciato MJ, Vastola JT, Lu J, Hess DW, Grover MA (2013) Initial experimental design methodology incorporating expert conjecture, prior data, and engineering models for deposition of iridium nanoparticles in supercritical carbon dioxide. Ind Eng Chem Res 52:9645–9653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chang C-J, Xu L, Huang Q, Shi J (2012) Quantitative characterization and modeling strategy of nanoparticle dispersion in polymer composites. IIE Trans 44:523–533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chang C-Y, Phillips EM, Liang R, Tozer SW, Wang B, Zhang C, Chiu H-T (2013) Alignment and properties of carbon nanotube buckypaper/liquid crystalline polymer composites. J Appl Polym Sci 128:1360—1368

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chen Y, Cheng C-Y, Miao H-Y, Zhang M, Liang R, Zhang C, Wang L-C, Wang B (2013) Application of response surface methodology in the optimization of laser treatment in buckypaper lighting for field emission displays. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 64:515—536

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chin K-S, Zhao Y, Mok CK (2002) STEP-based multiview integrated product modelling for concurrent engineering. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 20:896—906

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cranford SW, Buehler MJ (2010) In silico assembly and nanomechanical characterization of carbon nanotube buckypaper. Nanotechnology 21(265706)

  9. Dasgupta T, Weintraub B, Joseph VR (2011) A physical–statistical model for density control of nanowires. IIE Trans 43:233—241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ghomashchi M (2000) Squeeze casting: an overview. J Mater Process Technol 101:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hall LJ, Coluci VR, Galvão DS, Kozlov ME, Zhang M, Dantas SO, Baughman RH (2008) Sign change of Poisson’s ratio for carbon nanotube sheets. Science 320:504—507

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jia M, Ding G, Qin S, Li R, He Y (2013) Research of design and analysis integrated information modeling framework for multibody mechanical system: with its application in the LHD design. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 66:2107—2122

    Google Scholar 

  13. Joseph VR, Melkote SN (2009) Statistical adjustments to engineering models. J Qual Technol 41:362—375

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kim S, Kim H, Lu J-C, Casciato MJ, Grover MA, Hess DW, Lu RW, Wang X (2015a) Layers of experiments with adaptive combined design. Nav Res Logist 62:127–142

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Kim S, Kim H, Lu RW, Lu J-C, Casciato MJ, Grover MA (2015b) Adaptive combined space-filling and D-optimal designs. Int J Prod Res 53:5354–5368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Madigan D, Raftery AE (1994) Model selection and accounting for model uncertainty in graphical models using Occam’s window. J Am Stat Assoc 89:1535–1546

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Montgomery DC, Peck EA, Vining GG (2012) Introduction to linear regression analysis, vol 821. Wiley

  18. Muddada RR (2010) Towards resilient supply chain networks. University of Saskatchewan, Master thesis

    Google Scholar 

  19. Pourhabib A, Huang JZ, Wang K, Zhang C, Wang B, Ding Y (2015) Modulus prediction of buckypaper based on multi-fidelity analysis involving latent variables. IIE Trans 47:141–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Singh RK, Joseph VR, Melkote SN (2011) A statistical approach to the optimization of a laser-assisted micromachining process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 53:221–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Treacy MJ, Ebbesen T, Gibson J (1996) Exceptionally high Young’s modulus observed for individual carbon nanotubes. Nature 381:678—680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Vastola JT, Lu J-C, Casciato MJ, Hess DW, Grover MA (2013) A framework for initial experimental design in the presence of competing prior knowledge. J Qual Technol 45:301—329

    Google Scholar 

  23. Vohrer U, Kolaric I, Haque M, Roth S, Detlaff-Weglikowska U (2004) Carbon nanotube sheets for the use as artificial muscles. Carbon 42:1159—1164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Wang JW, Ip WH, Muddada RR, Huang JL, Zhang WJ (2013) On Petri net implementation of proactive resilient holistic supply chain networks. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 69:427—437

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wang K, Vanli A, Zhang C, Wang B (2016) Calibration and adjustment of mechanical property prediction model for poly (vinyl alcohol)-enhanced carbon nanotube buckypaper manufacturing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol:1–13

  26. Wang L, Huang Q (2013) Cross-domain model building and validation (CDMV): a new modeling strategy to reinforce understanding of nanomanufacturing processes. IEEE Trans Autom Sci Eng 10:571—578

    Google Scholar 

  27. Xu G, Zhang Q, Zhou W, Huang J, Wei F (2008) The feasibility of producing MWCNT paper and strong MWCNT film from VACNT array. Appl Phys A 92:531—539

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jye-Chyi Lu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, H., Kim, S., Deng, J. et al. An integrated holistic model of a complex process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 89, 1137–1147 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9088-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9088-0

Keywords

Navigation