Design of a circular hollow ultrasonic horn for USM using finite element analysis

  • Subhankar Roy
  • Jagadish


Ultrasonic machining (USM) is one of the non-conventional techniques extensively used in industries for machining hard and brittle materials. The USM operates on a very high frequency of around 20–40 kHz and the tool which vibrates gives amplitude of around 5 μm. However, in order to achieve proper machining, the tool must have an amplitude of around 10–100 μm. Therefore, the ultrasonic horn magnifies the amplitude of vibrations from the transducer end to the tool end. The magnification factor for the amplitude of vibration is dependent on the design of the ultrasonic horn. In the present work, an ultrasonic circular hollow horn is designed for USM using finite element analysis (FEA) to match the required performance of a conventional ultrasonic machine. Firstly, the profile of the horn is determined using the general differential equation for generating the 3D model. The natural frequencies and the mode shapes are determined by performing the modal analysis. Subsequently, the feasibility of the design is checked by performing the harmonic response analysis to determine the magnification factor and the equivalent stress experienced by the horn. Finally, the suggested design of ultrasonic horn is validated by comparing with the existing design of ultrasonic horns. The study indicates the dominance of the suggested design over other designs, while maintaining the stress value well below the limit of endurance for the horn material. Hence, a circular hollow ultrasonic horn is designed using FEA, which can be used for USM in industrial applications.


Ultrasonic machining (USM) Finite element analysis (FEA) Circular hollow horn (CHH) Amplification/magnification factor (AF/MF) 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Amin SG, Ahmed MHM, Youssef HA (1995) Computer aided design of acoustic horns for ultrasonic machining using finite element analysis. J Mater Process Technol 55:254–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nad M (2010) Ultrasonic horn design for ultrasonic machining technologies. Appl Comput Mech 4:79–88Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Seah KHW, Wong YS, Lee LC (1993) Design of tool holders for ultrasonic machining using FEM. J Mater Process Technol 37:801–816CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kremer D, Ghabrial SM, Moisan A (1981) The state of the art of ultrasonic machining. Ann. CIRP. pp.30. No.1. pp. 107–110Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rawson FF (1987) High power ultrasonic resonant horns. Part 1—basic design concepts: effects of material and horn dimensions. Conf. Proc. UI-87, London, pp 680–685Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mitrofanov AV, Babitsky VI, Silberschmidt VV (2004) Finite element analysis of ultrasonically assisted turning of Inconel 718. J Mater Process Technol 153–154:233–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nad M, Cicmancova L (2012) The effect of the shape parameters on modal properties of ultrasonic horn design for ultrasonic assisted machining. 8th Int. DAAAM Baltic Conf. Industrial Engg., Tallinn, pp, 57–62Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yadava V, Deoghare A (2008) Design of horn for rotary ultrasonic machining using finite element method. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 39:9–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Youssef HA, & El-Hofy H (2008) Machining technology—machine tools and operations. CRC Press Taylor and Francis Group. 13: 978-1-4200-4339-6Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gorman RW (1985) ANSYS-PC manual. Swanson Analysis Systems Inc, PennsylvaniaGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tuncer HK, Norrie DH (1987) Finite element hand-book. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Shigley JE (1986) Mechanical engineering design, 1st metric. McGraw-Hill, SingaporeGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringNational Institute of TechnologySilcharIndia

Personalised recommendations