Advertisement

Smooth particle hydrodynamics study of surface defect machining for diamond turning of silicon

  • Amir Mir
  • Xichun LuoEmail author
  • Amir Siddiq
Open Access
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Abstract

This paper presents the feasibility study of potential application of recently developed surface defect machining (SDM) method in the fabrication of silicon and similar hard and brittle materials using smooth particle hydrodynamics (SPH) simulation approach. Simulation study of inverse parametric analysis was carried out to determine the Drucker-Prager (DP) constitutive model parameters of silicon by analysing the deformed material response behaviour using various DP model parameters. Indentation test simulations were carried out to perform inverse parametric study. SPH approach was exploited to machine silicon using conventional and surface defect machining method. To this end, we delve into opportunities of exploiting SDM through optimised machining quality, reduced machining time and lowering cost. The results of the conventional simulation were compared with the results of experimental diamond turning of silicon. In the SPH simulations, various types of surface defects were introduced on the workpiece prior to machining. Surface defects were equally distributed on the top face of the workpiece. The simulation study encompasses the investigation of chip formation, resultant machining forces, stresses and hydrostatic pressure with and without SDM. The study reveals the SDM process is an effective technique to manufacture hard and brittle materials as well as facilitate increased tool life. The study also divulges the importance of SPH evading the mesh distortion problem and offer natural chip formation during machining of hard and brittle materials.

Keywords

Surface defect machining Diamond turning Silicon SPH 

References

  1. 1.
    King RF, Tabor D (1954) The strength properties and frictional behaviour of brittle solids. Proc Roy Soc Lond Ser Math Phys Sci 223(1153):225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Morris JC et al (1995) Origins of the ductile regime in single-point diamond turning of semiconductors. J Am Ceram Soc 78(8):2015–2020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zarudi I et al (2004) The R8-BC8 phases and crystal growth in monocrystalline silicon under microindentation with a spherical indenter. J Mater Res 19(1):332–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Patten J, Gao W, Yasuto K (2005) Ductile regime nanomachining of single-crystal silicon carbide. J Manuf Sci Eng 127(3):522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Blackley WS, Scattergood RO (1991) Ductile-regime machining model for diamond turning of brittle materials. Precis Eng-J Am Soc Precis Eng 13(2):95–103Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Durazo-Cardenas I et al (2007) 3D characterisation of tool wear whilst diamond turning silicon. Wear 262(3-4):340–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rusnaldy, Ko TJ, Kim HS (2007) An experimental study on microcutting of silicon using a micromilling machine. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 39(1-2):85–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tang X et al (2013) Ultraprecision micromachining of hard material with tool wear suppression by using diamond tool with special chamfer. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 62(1):51–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tanaka H, Shimada S (2013) Damage-free machining of monocrystalline silicon carbide. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 62(1):55–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Suzuki H et al (2013) Development of micro milling tool made of single crystalline diamond for ceramic cutting. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 62(1):59–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wang ZY, Rajurkar KP (2000) Cryogenic machining of hard-to-cut materials. Wear 239(2):168–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ghosh R (2006) Technology assessment on current advanced research projects in cryogenic machining. 1–87Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Umbrello D, Micari F, Jawahir IS (2012) The effects of cryogenic cooling on surface integrity in hard machining: a comparison with dry machining. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 61(1):103–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kumar MN et al (2014) Vibration assisted conventional and advanced machining: a review. Procedia Eng 97:1577–1586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Skelton RC (1967) Turning with an oscillating tool. Int J Mach Tool Des Res 8:239–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Brehl DE, Dow TA (2008) Review of vibration-assisted machining. Precis Eng 32(3):153–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Venkatesan K, Ramanujam R, Kuppan P (2014) Laser assisted machining of difficult to cut materials: research opportunities and future directions—a comprehensive review. Procedia Eng 97:1626–1636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Xavierarockiaraj S, Kuppan P (2014) Investigation of cutting forces, surface roughness and tool wear during laser assisted machining of SKD11Tool steel. Procedia Eng 97:1657–1666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rahman Rashid RA et al (2012) An investigation of cutting forces and cutting temperatures during laser-assisted machining of the Ti–6Cr–5Mo–5V–4Al beta titanium alloy. Int J Mach Tool Manuf 63:58–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mohammadi H et al (2015) Experimental work on micro laser-assisted diamond turning of silicon (111). J Manuf Process 19:125–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rashid WB et al (2013) The development of a surface defect machining method for hard turning processes. Wear 302(1-2):1124–1135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rashid WB et al (2013) An experimental investigation for the improvement of attainable surface roughness during hard turning process. Proc Inst Mech Eng, Part B: J Eng Manuf 227(2):338–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Jackson MJ, Robinson GM (2005) High strain rate induced initial chip formation of certain metals during micromachining processes. Mater Sci Technol 21(3):281–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Priyadarshinin A, Samantaray AK (2012) Finite element modeling of chip formation in orthogonal machining. In: Davim JP (ed) Statistical and computational techniques in manufacturing. London.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Carroll JT, Strenkowski JS (1988) Finite-element models of orthogonal cutting with application to single point diamond turning. Int J Mech Sci 30(12):899–920CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Movahhedy M, Gadala MS, Altintas Y (2000) Simulation of the orthogonal metal cutting process using an arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian finite-element method. J Mater Process Technol 103(2):267–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Gong Y (2010) Meshless methods in LS DYNA: an overview of EFG and SPH. in LS DYNA seminar. Livermore Software Technology Corporation, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Uhlmann E, Gerstenberger R, Kuhnert J (2013) Cutting simulation with the meshfree finite pointset method. Procedia CIRP 8:391–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Gingold RA, Monaghan JJ (1977) Smoothed particle hydrodynamics: theory and application to non shperical stars. Mon Not R Astron Soc: 375–389Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Cleary PW, Prakash M, Ha J (2006) Novel applications of smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) in metal forming. J Mater Process Technol 177(1–3):41–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Rüttimann N et al (2013) Simulation of hexa-octahedral diamond grain cutting tests using the SPH method. Procedia CIRP 8:322–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Das R, Cleary PW (2010) Effect of rock shapes on brittle fracture using smoothed particle hydrodynamics. Theor Appl Fract Mech 53(1):47–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Bui HH et al (2008) Lagrangian meshfree particles method (SPH) for large deformation and failure flows of geomaterial using elastic-plastic soil constitutive model. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 32(12):1537–1570CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Lin J et al (2014) Efficient meshless SPH method for the numerical modeling of thick shell structures undergoing large deformations. Int J Non Linear Mech 65:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Nordendale NA, PK Basu, Heard WF (2013) Modeling of high rate ballistic impact of brittle armors with abaqus explicit. In: Simulia Community Conference, Vienna, AustriaGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Villumsen MF, Fauerholdt TG (2008) Simulation of metal cutting using smooth particle hydrodynamics. in LS-DYNA: metallumformung III. Anwenderforum, BambergGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Zhao H et al (2013) Influences of sequential cuts on micro-cutting process studied by smooth particle hydrodynamic (SPH). Appl Surf Sci 284:366–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Gasiorek D (2013) The application of the smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) method and the experimental verification of cutting of sheet metal bundles using a guillotine. J Theor Appl Mech 51(4):1053–1065Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Xi Y et al (2014) SPH/FE modeling of cutting force and chip formation during thermally assisted machining of Ti6Al4V alloy. Comput Mater Sci 84:188–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Limido J et al (2007) SPH method applied to high speed cutting modelling. Int J Mech Sci 49(7):898–908CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Calamaz M et al (2009) Toward a better understanding of tool wear effect through a comparison between experiments and SPH numerical modelling of machining hard materials. Int J Refract Met Hard Mater 27(3):595–604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Okhrimenko GM (1989) Single crystal silicon piezoelectric ceramics and ferrite under uniaxial compression. Problemy Prochnosti 9:45–80Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Wan H et al (2011) A plastic damage model for finite element analysis of cracking of silicon under indentation. J Mater Res 25(11):2224–2237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Drucker DC, Prager WJ (1952) Soil mechanics and plastic analysis or limit design. Brown University, Division of Applied MathematicsGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Simulia (2014) User documentation, Abaqus 6.14 Software manualGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Seltzer R et al (2011) Determination of the Drucker–Prager parameters of polymers exhibiting pressure-sensitive plastic behaviour by depth-sensing indentation. Int J Mech Sci 53(6):471–478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Yoshino M et al (2001) Some experiments on the scratching of silicon: in situ scratching inside an SEM and scratching under high external hydrostatic pressures. Int J Mech Sci 43(2):335–347MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Jang J-I et al (2005) Indentation-induced phase transformations in silicon: influences of load, rate and indenter angle on the transformation behavior. Acta Mater 53(6):1759–1770CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Zarudi I, Zhang LC (1999) Structure changes in mono-crystalline silicon subjected to indentation experimental finding. Tribol Int 32:701–712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Juliano T, Domnich V, Gogotsi Y (2011) Examining pressure-induced phase transformations in silicon by spherical indentation and Raman spectroscopy: a statistical study. J Mater Res 19(10):3099–3108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Cao YP, Dao M, Lu J (2011) A precise correcting method for the study of the superhard material using nanoindentation tests. J Mater Res 22(05):1255–1264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Kailer A, Gogotsi YG, Nickel KG (1997) Phase transformations of silicon caused by contact loading. J Appl Phys 81(7):3057CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Özel T (2006) The influence of friction models on finite element simulations of machining. Int J Mach Tool Manuf 46(5):518–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Yan J, Zhao H, Kuriyagawa T (2009) Effects of tool edge radius on ductile machining of silicon: an investigation by FEM. Semicond Sci Technol 24(7):075018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Fang N, Jawahir IS (2002) Analytical predictions and experimental validation of cutting force ratio, chip thickness, and chip back-flow angle in restricted contact machining using the universal slip-line model. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 42(6):681–694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Pang L, Kishawy HA (2012) Modified primary shear zone analysis for identification of material mechanical behavior during machining process using genetic algorithm. J Manuf Sci Eng 134(4):041003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Lee S et al (2005) Large strain deformation field in machining. Metall Mater Trans 37(A):1633–1643Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Fang N (2005) Tool-chip friction in machining with a large negative rake angle tool. Wear 258(5-6):890–897CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Cubberley WH, Bakerjian R (1989) Tool and manufacturing engineers handbook, ed. S.o.M.E. (SME). USAGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2016

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Precision Manufacturing, Department of Design, Manufacture and Engineering ManagementUniversity of StrathclydeGlasgowUK
  2. 2.Department of Physical SciencesUniversity of AberdeenAberdeenUK

Personalised recommendations