Numerical analysis method of cemented carbide turning tool’s micro breakage based on peridynamic theory

  • Hongwan Jiang
  • Lin HeEmail author
  • Lin Fan
  • Gang Zhan


This study presented here focuses on numerical analysis method of micro breakage in the region near main cutting edge of cemented carbide turning tool in the process of cutting 40CrMnMo based on peridynamic theory. FEM simulation of this cutting process is carried out firstly to extract load data of turning tool; then in the Visual C++ environment, the program of PD modeling and analysis is written using C language based on PD theory. With image processing unit in MATLAB, micro breakage visualization of the region near the main cutting edge of this tool is achieved, including the crack initiation position, displacement trend of material particle in different directions, and propagation tendency of crack. Combined with numerical simulation and cutting test, the numerical analysis method of cemented carbide tool’s micro breakage based on PD theory is proved to be able to reveal the mechanism and propagation process of micro breakage inside the tool material of the region near the main cutting edge of the cemented carbide turning tool: the micro breakage under given working condition is mainly resulted from the mechanical micro crack in a certain angle with the normal of rake face caused by mechanical shock and has a trend of discontinuous extending to internal material. This method has a certain guiding significance for further research of the discontinuous breakage problems of tool material in the metal cutting process.


Peridaynamic theory Cemented carbide tool Micro breakage Numerical analysis method 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


Compliance with ethical standards


The National Natural Science Foundation of China (51265005)


  1. 1.
    Zhai QP (2015) Thermodynamic analysis of bond breakage and entropy production model for carbide tool. Harbin University of Science and Technology, ChinaGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    He ZJ, Cao HR, Li Z, Zi YY, Chen XF (2009) The 2nd generation wavelet transform principle of detecting breakage of milling cutter. Sci China (Series E) 39(6):1174–1184Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    He XH, Ye P, Zhang JY (2011) On-line tool breakage monitoring method based on power information and cross-correlation algorithm[J]. J Chongqing Univ 34(9):9–16Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hu YL, Yu Y, Wang H (2013) Damage analysis method for laminates based on peridynamic theory. Chinese J Theoretic Appl Mech 45(4):624–628Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Buchkremer S, Klocke F, Veselovae D (2016) 3D FEM simulation of chip breakage in metal cutting. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 82(3):645–661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Agwai A, Guven I, Madenci E (2011) Predicting crack propagation with peridynamics: a comparative study. Int J Fract 171(1):65–78CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ostoja-Starzewski M, Demmie PN, Zubelewicz A (2013) On thermodynamic restrictions in peridynamics. J Appl Mech Trans ASME 80(1):014502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Alali B, Gunzburger M (2015) Peridynamics and material interfaces. J Elast 120(2):225–248MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Seleson P, Beneddine S, Prudhomme S (2013) A force-based coupling scheme for peridynamics and classical elasticity. Comput Mater Sci 66(1):34–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Huang D, Zhang Q, Qiao PZ (2011) Damage and progressive failure of concrete structures using non-local peridynamic modeling. Science. China Technol Sci 54(3):591–596CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lehoucq RB, Silling SA (2008) Force flux and the peridynamic stress tensor. J Mech Phys Solids 56(4):1566–1577MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Oterkus E (2010) Peridynamic theory modeling three-dimensional damage growth in metallic and composite structures. University of Arizona, USAGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yu KB, Xin XJ, Lease KB (2011) A new method of adaptive integration with error control for bond-based peridynamics. Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science 2010, San Francisco, USA: 1041-1046Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Huang D, Lu GD, Qiao PZ (2015) An improved peridynamic approach for quasi-static elastic deformation and brittle fracture analysis. Int J Mech Sci 94(5):111–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gu XM, Huang TZ, Zhao XL (2014) Circulant preconditioned iterative methods for peridynamic model simulation. Applied. Mathematics Comput 248(12):470–479MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Oterkus E, Madenci E, Weckner O (2012) Combined finite element and peridynamic analyses for predicting failure in a stiffened composite curved panel with a central slot. Compos Struct 94(3):839–850CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chen ZG, Bobaru F (2015) Peridynamic modeling of pitting corrosion damage. J Mech Phys Solids 78(5):352–381MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Silling SA (2000) Reformulation of elasticity theory for discontinuities and long-range forces. J Mech Phys Solids 48(1):175–209MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Erbay HA, Erkip A, Muslu GM (2012) The Cauchy problem for a one-dimensional nonlinear elastic peridynamic model. J Differential Eqs 252(8):4392–4409MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Henke SF, Shanbhag S (2014) Mesh sensitivity in peridynamic simulations. Comput Phys Commun 185(1):181–193MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hu WK, Ha YD, Bobaru F (2012) Peridynamic model for dynamic fracture in unidirectional fiber-reinforced composites. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 217(4):247–261MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kilic B, Agwai A, Madenci E (2009) Peridynamic theory for progressive damage prediction in center-cracked composite laminates. Compos Struct 90(2):141–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hu YL, Yu Y, Wang H (2014) Peridynamic analytical method for progressive damage in notched composite laminates. Composite Structure 108:801–810CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mengesha T, Du Q (2014) Nonlocal constrained value problems for a linear peridynamic navier equation. J Elast 116(1):27–51MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Jabakhanji R, Mohtar RH (2015) A peridynamic model of flow in porous media. Adv Water Resour 78(4):22–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    O’Grady J, Foster J (2014) Peridynamic plates and flat shells: a non-ordinary, state-based model. Int J Solid Structure 51(25):4572–4579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ha YD, Bobaru F (2010) Studies of dynamic crack propagation and crack branching with peridynamics. Int J Fract 162(2):229–44CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kilic B, Madenci E (2009) Structural stability and failure analysis using peridynamics theory. International. J Non-Linear Mech 44(8):845–854CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Geratle W, Sau N, Aguilera E (2007) Peridynamic modeling of concrete structures. Nuclear Eng Design 237(12):1250–1258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Bobaru F, Duangpanya M (2010) The peridynamic formulation for transient heat conduction. Int J Heat Mass Transf 53(19):4047–4059CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Buchkremer S, Klock F, Lung D (2015) Finite-element-analysis of the relationship between chip geometry and stress triaxiality distribution in the chip breakage location of metal cutting operations. Simul Model Pract Theory 55(6):10–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Cakir MC, Isik Y (2005) Detecting tool breakage in turning aisi 1050 steel using coating and uncoated cutting tools. J Mater Process Technol 159(2):191–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Cabanes I, Portill E, Marcos M, Sanchez JA (2008) On-line prevention of wire breakage in wire electro-discharge machining. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 24(2):287–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Sevilla-Camacho PY, Herrera-Ruiz G, Robles-Ocampo JB, Jauregui- Correa JC (2011) Tool breakage detection in CNC high- speed milling based in feed-motor current signals. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 53(10):1141–1148CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Mechanical EngineeringGuizhou UniversityGuiyangChina
  2. 2.Guizhou Normal CollegeGuiyangChina

Personalised recommendations