Advertisement

Effect of stress relieving heat treatment on surface topography and dimensional accuracy of incrementally formed grade 1 titanium sheet parts

  • Amar Kumar Behera
  • Hengan Ou
Open Access
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Abstract

The forming of parts with an optimized surface roughness and high dimensional accuracy is important in many applications of incremental sheet forming (ISF). To realize this, the effect of stress relieving heat treatment of grade-1 Ti parts performed before and after forming on the surface finish and dimensional accuracy was studied. It was found that heat treatment at a temperature of 540 °C for 2 h improves the surface finish of formed parts resulting in a surface with little or no visible tool marks. Additionally, it improves the dimensional accuracy of parts after unclamping from the rig used for forming, in particular, that of parts with shallow wall angles (typically <25°). It was also noted that post-forming heat treatment improves the surface finish of parts. The surface topography of formed parts was studied using interferometry to yield areal surface roughness parameters and subsequently using secondary electron imaging. Back-scatter electron microscopy imaging results coupled with energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) analysis showed that heat treatment prior to forming leads to tool wear as indicated by the presence of Fe in samples. Furthermore, post-forming heat treatment prevents curling up of formed parts due to compressive stresses if the formed part is trimmed.

Keywords

Stress relieving Heat treatment Titanium Incremental sheet forming Surface roughness Trimming 

References

  1. 1.
    Krebs RE (2006) The history and use of our earth’s chemical elements: a reference guide, 2nd edn. Greenwood Press, WestportGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bannon B, Mild E (1983) Titanium alloys for biomaterial application: an overview. Titanium alloys in surgical implants. ASTM STP 796:7–15Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Donachie MJ (2000) Titanium: a Technical Guide. 2nd edn. ASM International, Materials Park, OhioGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nishiguchi S, Nakamura T, Kobayashi M, Kim HM, Miyaji F, Kokubo T (1999) The effect of heat treatment on bone-bonding ability of alkali-treated titanium. Biomaterials 20(5):491–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T (2000) Suggested guidelines for the topographic evaluation of implant surfaces. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 15(3):331–344Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T, Andersson B (1995) Bone tissue response to commercially pure titanium implants blasted with fine and coarse particles of aluminum oxide. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 11(1):38–45Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jeswiet J, Micari F, Hirt G, Bramley A, Duflou J, Allwood J (2005) Asymmetric single point incremental forming of sheet metal. Cirp Ann-Manuf Technol 54(2):623–649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Behera AK (2013) Shape Feature Taxonomy Development for Toolpath Optimisation in Incremental Sheet Forming. PhD Thesis. Katholieke Universiteit Leuven ISBN 978-94-6018-733-9Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Behera AK, Lauwers B, Duflou JR (2013) Tool path generation for single point incremental forming using intelligent sequencing and multi-step mesh morphing techniques. Int J Mater Form 8(4):517–532. doi: 10.1007/s12289-014-1174-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kurra S, Rahman NH, Regalla SP, Gupta AK (2015) Modeling and optimization of surface roughness in single point incremental forming process. J Mater Res Technol 4(3):304–313. doi: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2015.01.003
  11. 11.
    Ham M, Powers B, Brown C, Jeswiet J, Hamilton K (2009) Roughness evaluation of single point incrementally formed surfaces. Trans NAMRI/SME 37:411–418Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hamilton K, Jeswiet J (2010) Single point incremental forming at high feed rates and rotational speeds: surface and structural consequences. Cirp Ann-Manuf Technol 59(1):311–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ham M, Powers BM, Loiselle J (2013) Surface topography from single point incremental forming using an acetal tool. Key Eng Mater 549:84–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ham M, Powers BM, Loiselle J (2014) Multiscale analysis of surface topography from single point incremental forming using an acetal tool. J Phys 483:012008Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Behera AK, Lauwers B, Duflou JR (2014) Tool path generation framework for accurate manufacture of complex 3D sheet metal parts using single point incremental forming. Comput Ind 65(4):563–584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Behera AK, Verbert J, Lauwers B, Duflou JR (2013) Tool path compensation strategies for single point incremental sheet forming using multivariate adaptive regression splines. Comput Aided Des 45(3):575–590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Malhotra R, Reddy NV, Cao JA (2010) Automatic 3D spiral toolpath generation for single point incremental forming. J Manuf Sci E-T Asme 132(6):1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Essa K, Hartley P (2011) An assessment of various process strategies for improving precision in single point incremental forming. Int J Mater Form 4(4):401–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Duflou JR, Callebaut B, Verbert J, De Baerdemaeker H (2007) Laser assisted incremental forming: formability and accuracy improvement. Cirp Ann-Manuf Technol 56(1):273–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fan GQ, Gao L, Hussain G, Wu ZL (2008) Electric hot incremental forming: a novel technique. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 48(15):1688–1692CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Verbert J, Duflou JR, Lauwers B (2007) Feature based approach for increasing the accuracy of the SPIF process. Key Eng Mater 344:527–534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lu B, Chen J, Ou H, Cao J (2013) Feature-based tool path generation approach for incremental sheet forming process. J Mater Process Technol 213(7):1221–1233. doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2013.01.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Malhotra R, Cao J, Ren F, Kiridena V, Xia ZC, Reddy NV (2011) Improvement of Geometric Accuracy in Incremental Forming by Using a Squeezing Toolpath Strategy With Two Forming Tools. J Manuf Sci E-T Asme 133(6):061019. doi: 10.1115/1.4005179
  24. 24.
    Göttmann A, Korinth M, Schäfer V, Araghi BT, Bambach M, Hirt G (2013) Manufacturing of individualized cranial implants using two point incremental sheet metal forming. In: Schuh G, Neugebauer R, Uhlmann E (eds) Future trends in production engineering. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 287–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Duflou JR, Behera AK, Vanhove H, Bertol LS (2013) Manufacture of accurate titanium cranio-facial implants with high forming angle using single point incremental forming. Key Eng Mater 549:223–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    ASM Metals Handbook, Volume 4, Heat Treating (1991) ASM International, Materials Park, OhioGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Semiatin SL, Seetharaman V, Weiss I (1997) The thermomechanical processing of alpha/beta titanium alloys. Jom J Miner Met Mater Soc 49(6):33–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Behera AK, Lu B, Ou H (2015) Characterization of shape and dimensional accuracy of incrementally formed titanium sheet parts with intermediate curvatures between two feature types. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 83(5):1099–1111Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lu B, Ou H, Shi S, Long H, Chen J (2014) Titanium based cranial reconstruction using incremental sheet forming. Thematic Issue: Flexible Forming - Incremental Sheet Forming & Roll Forming. Int J Mater Form:1-10. doi: 10.1007/s12289-014-1205-8
  30. 30.
    ISO 25178: Geometrical product specifications (GPS) - Surface texture: Areal (2012) International Organisation for StandardisationGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Welcome to Vision64 (2012) User Manual, Bruker CorporationGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    da Rocha SS, Adabo GL, Henriques GE, Nobilo MA (2006) Vickers hardness of cast commercially pure titanium and Ti-6Al-4V alloy submitted to heat treatments. Braz Dent J 17(2):126–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Fitzpatrick ME, Fry AT, Holdway P, Kandil FA, Shackleton J, Suominen L (2005) Determination of Residual Stresses by X-ray Diffraction – Issue 2. Measurement Good Practice Guide No. 52. National Physical Laboratory. http://www.npl.co.uk/upload/pdf/Determination_of_Residual_Stresses_by_X-ray_Diffraction_-_Issue_2.pdf. Accessed 31 Mar 2016
  34. 34.
    Culity B, Stock S (2001) Elements of X-ray Diffraction, 3rd edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2016

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Engineering, Division of Materials, Mechanics and StructuresUniversity of NottinghamNottinghamUK
  2. 2.School of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of LeedsLeedsUK

Personalised recommendations