Skip to main content
Log in

Decision-making of feature operation chain considering processing requirements and manufacturing stability

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Existing decision-making methods for selection of feature operation chains normally only consider the processing requirements and neglect the impacts of the selected feature operation chain on the production line of the enterprise. As a result, the newly inserted manufacturing task may lead to a decrease in the manufacturing stability, which increases the malfunction probability of some machines and reduces production efficiency simultaneously. To solve this problem, a decision-making method for feature operation chain selection considering processing requirements and manufacturing stability is presented. The proposed method explores the factors affecting selection of a feature operation chain and develops a fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model of feature operation chain selection using hole feature as an example, thus realizing the selection of possible feature operation chains based on processing requirements. The method further applies a complex network theory to build an enterprise manufacturing network model, analyzes the manufacturing network stability, and then evaluates potential feature operation chains using a network stability index. Experimental results show that the proposed method is feasible and effective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bhale S, Baki MF, Azab A (2014) Grouping and sequencing of machining operations for high volume transfer lines. Proc CIRP 17:76–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wong TN, Chan LCF, Lau HCW (2003) Machining process sequencing with fuzzy expert system and genetic algorithms. Eng Comput Ger 19(2):191–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Joshi S, Chang TC (1988) Graph-based heuristics for recognition of machined features from a 3D solid model. Comput Aided Des 20(2):58–66

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Sunil VB, Agarwal R, Pande SS (2010) An approach to recognize interacting features from b-rep cad models of prismatic machined parts using a hybrid (graph and rule based) technique. Comput Ind 61(7):686–701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Deb S, Ghosh K, Paul S (2006) A neural network based methodology for machining operations selection in computer-aided process planning for rotationally symmetrical parts. J Intell Manuf 17:557–569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Li Y, Liu J, Tao Y (2009) Selecting machining method based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation. IEEE Int Conf Intell Comput Intell Syst 1:133–136

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hua GR, Zhou XH, Ruan XY (2007) Ga-based synthesis approach for machining scheme selection and operation sequencing optimization for prismatic parts. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 33:594–603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Guan X, Wang Y, Tao L (2009) Machining scheme selection of digital manufacturing based on genetic algorithm and AHP. J Intell Manuf 20:661–669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wang M, Wang Z, Wang J (2010) Research on ann-based machining operation selection for rotational parts. J Univ Electron Sci and Technol China 39(3):470–474

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kumar A, Choi SK, Goksel L (2011) Tolerance allocation of assemblies using fuzzy comprehensive evaluation and decision support process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 55:379–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Guo L, Gao J, Yang J, Kang J (2009) Criticality evaluation of petrochemical equipment based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation and a bp neural network. J Loss Prev Proc 22(4):469–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chu W, Li Y, Liu C, Mou W, Tang L (2014) A manufacturing resource allocation method with knowledge-based fuzzy comprehensive evaluation for aircraft structural parts. Int J Prod Res 52(11):3239–3258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cohen R, Havlin S (2010) Complex networks: structure robustness and function. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhao L, Diao G, Yan P, Yao Y, Chen H (2015) A gene recombination method for machine tools design based on complex network. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. doi:10.1007/s00170-015-7591-3

    Google Scholar 

  15. He P, Jing CG, Fan T, Chen CZ (2014) Robust decentralized adaptive synchronization of general complex networks with coupling delayed and uncertainties. Complexity 19(3):10–26

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Qin Y, Zhao L, Yao Y, Xu D (2011) Multistage machining processes variation propagation analysis based on machining processes weighted network performance. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 55:487–499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Fu X, Small M, Chen G (2014) Propagation dynamics on complex networks: models, methods and stability analysis. Higher Education Press, Beijing

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Shannon CE, Weaver W (1948) A mathematical theory of communication, 1948. Bell Syst Technol J 27(3):3–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chunlei Li.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, C., Mo, R., Chang, Z. et al. Decision-making of feature operation chain considering processing requirements and manufacturing stability. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 87, 1725–1737 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-8578-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-8578-4

Keywords

Navigation