Skip to main content
Log in

A method to predict possibility of arcing in EDM of TiB2p reinforced ferrous matrix composite

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Electrical Discharge Machining (EDM) is very popular for machining conductive metal matrix composites (MMCs) because the hardness rendered by the ceramic reinforcements to these composites causes very high tool wear and cutting forces in conventional machining processes. EDM requires selection of a number of parameters for desirable results. Inappropriate parameter selection can lead to high overcuts, tool wear, excessive roughness, and arcing during machining and adversely affect machining quality. Arcing leads to short circuit gap conditions resulting in large energy discharges and uncontrolled machining. Arcing is a detrimental phenomenon in EDM which causes spoiling of workpiece and tool electrode and tends to damage the power supply of EDM machine. Parameter combinations that lead to arcing during machining have to be identified and avoided for every tool, work material, and dielectric combination. Proper selection of parameter combinations to avoid arcing is essential in EDM. In the work, experiments were conducted using L27 design of experiment to determine the parameter settings which cause arcing in EDM machining of TiB2p reinforced ferrous matrix composite. Important EDM process parameters were selected in roughing, intermediate, and finishing range so as to study the occurrence of arcing. Using the experimental data, an artificial neural network (ANN) model was developed as a tool to predict the possibility of arcing for selected parameter combinations. This model can help avoid the parameter combinations which can lead to arcing during actual machining using EDM. The ANN model was validated by conducting validation experiments to ensure that it can work accurately as a predicting tool to know beforehand whether the selected parameters will lead to arcing during actual machining using EDM. Validation results show that the ANN model developed can predict arcing possibility accurately when the depth of machining is included as input variable for the model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Saha P, Tarafdar D, Pal SK, Saha P, Srivastava A K, Das K (2009) Modeling of wire electro-discharge machining of TiC/Fe in situ metal matrix composite using normalized RBFN with enhanced k-means clustering technique. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 43(1–2):107–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Nahme H, Lach E, Tarran A (2009) Mechanical property under high dynamic loading and microstructure evaluation of TiB2 particle-reinforced stainless steel. J Mater Sci 44:463–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Tjong SC, Lau KC (2000) Abrasion resistance of stainless-steel composites reinforced with hard TiB2 particle. Combust Sci Technol 60:1141–1146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Rozenek M, Kozak J, Dabrowski L, Lubkowski K (2001) Electrical discharge machining characteristics of metal matrix composites. J Mater Process Technol 109:367–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cogun C (1990) A technique and its application for evaluation of materials contributions in electric discharge machining. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 30(1):19–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ramulu M, Taya M (1989) EDM machining of SiC w /Al composite. J Mater Sci 24:1103–1108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hung NP, Yang IJ, Leong K W (1994) Electrical discharge machining of cast metal matrix composites. J Mater Process Technol 41:229–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hocheng H, Lei WI, Hsu HS (1997) Preliminary study of material removal in electric discharge machining of SiC/Al. J Mater Process Technol 63:813–818

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Karthikeyan R, Lakshmi Narayanan P R, Naagarazan RS (1999) Mathematical modeling for electric discharge machining of aluminium–silicon carbide particulate composites. J Mater Process Technol 87:59–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ramulu M, Paul G, Patel J (2001) EDM surface effects on fatigue strength of 15 vol.% SiC p /Al metal matrix composite material. Compos Struct 54:79–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mohan B, Rajadurai A, Satyanarayana KG (2002) Effect of SiC and rotation of electrode on electric discharge machining of Al-SiC composite. J Mater Process Technol 124:297–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Narender Singh P, Raghukandan K, Pai BC (2004) Optimization by Grey relational of EDM parameters on machining Al–10%SiC p composites. J Mater Process Technol 155–156:1658–1661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mohan B, Rajadurai A, Satyanarayana KG (2004) Electric discharge machining of Al–SiC metal matrix composites using rotary tube electrode. J Mater Process Technol 153–154:978–985

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Seo YW, Kim D, Ramulu M (2006) Electrical discharge machining of functionally graded 15–35 vol.% SiC p /Al composites. Mater Manuf Process 21:479–487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dhar S, Purohit R, Saini N, Sharma A, Hemath Kumar G (2007) Mathematical modeling of electric discharge machining of cast Al–4Cu–6Si alloy–10 wt.% SiC p composites. J Mater Process Technol 194:24–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Riaz Ahamed A, Asokan P, Aravindan S (2009) EDM of hybrid Al–SiC p -B4 C p and Al–SiC p –Glass p MMCs. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 44:520–528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Manna AA, Bhattacharyya B (2006) Taguchi and Gauss elimination method: a dual response approach for parametric optimization of CNC wire cut EDM of PR AlSiC MMC. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 28:67–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Patil NG, Brahmankar PK (2010) Some studies into wire electro-discharge machining of alumina particulate reinforced aluminium matrix composites. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 48(5):537–555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Patil NG, Brahmankar PK (2010) On the response surface modeling of wire electrical discharge machining of Al/SiC p Metal Matrix Composites (MMCs). Journal of Machining and Forming Technologies 2(1/2):47–70

    Google Scholar 

  20. Patil NG, Brahmankar PK (2010) Determination of material removal rate in wire electro-discharge machining of metal matrix composites using dimensional analysis. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 51(5):599–610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kunieda M, Lauwers B, Rajurkar KP, Schumacher BM (2005) Advancing EDM through Fundamental Insight into the Process. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 54(2):64–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kruth JP (1979) Adaptive Control Optimization of Electro-Discharge Machining, Ph.D. thesis 79D3, ME Dept., K. U Leuven

  23. Snoeys R, Dauw D, Kruth JP (1980) Improved adaptive control system for EDM processes. CIRP Ann 29(1):97–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Frohn-Villeneuve L, Curodeau A (2013) Dry die-sinking EDM with mouldable graphite-polymer electrode investigation of process parameters and pulse identification methods. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 65:1125–1139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Wei C, Zhao L, Hu D, Ni J (2013) Electrical discharge machining of ceramic matrix composites with ceramic fiber reinforcements. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 64:187–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Descoeudres A (2006) Characterization of Electrical Discharge Machining Plasmas, Ph.D. thesis 3542, Center for Research in Physics and Plasmas, cole Polytechnique Fderal de Lausanne

  27. Haykin S (1994) Neural networks, a comprehensive foundation. McMillian College Publishing Company, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Kao JY, Tarng YS (1997) A neutral-network approach for the on-line monitoring of the electrical discharge machining process. J Mater Process Technol 69:112–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Tsai KM, Wang PJ (2001) Comparisons of neural network models on material Removal rate in electrical discharge machining. J Mater Process Technol 117:111–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Markopoulos AP, Manolakos DE, Vaxevanidis NM (2008) Artificial neural network models for the prediction of surface roughness in electrical discharge machining. J Intell Manuf 19:283– 292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Assarzadeh S, Ghoreishi M (2008) Neural-network-based modeling and optimization of the electro-discharge machining process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 39:488–500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Fausett L (1994) Fundamentals of neural networks: architectures, algorithms, and applications. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Pandey AB, Brahmankar PK, Purohit HS (2010) Experimental Determination of Parameters to Avoid Arcing in Electrical Discharge Machining of Titanium Diboride Particulate Reinforced Ferrous Matrix Composite, ASME Conference Proceedings (IMECE2010), 993. doi:10.1115/IMECE2010-39886

  34. Garg RK, Singh KK, Sachdeva A, Sharma VS, Ojha K, Singh S (2010) Review of research work in sinking EDM and WEDM on metal matrix composite materials. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 50:611–624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Ho KH, Newman ST (2003) State of the art electrical discharge machining (EDM). Int J Mach Tools Manuf 43:1287–1300

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. B. Pandey.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pandey, A.B., Brahmankar, P.K. A method to predict possibility of arcing in EDM of TiB2p reinforced ferrous matrix composite. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 86, 2837–2849 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-8414-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-8414-x

Keywords

Navigation