Skip to main content

Application of adaptive neuro fuzzy inference system and genetic algorithm for pressure path optimization in sheet hydroforming process

Abstract

One of the most important parameters in success of sheet hydroforming process is loading (pressure) path. Improper pressure of fluid chamber during the process may cause a number of defects such as necking, tearing, and wrinkling. Theoretical calculations and finite element trial-and-error simulations to find the optimum pressure paths are so costly and time-consuming. This study underlines the application of adaptive neuro fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) and genetic algorithm (GA) for pressure path optimization in hydrodynamic hydroforming process of cylindrical-spherical parts. In this research, an ANFIS model has been developed based on finite element simulation results to identify the effect of the pressure path on the maximum thinning in the critical region of the part. In subsequent step, the ANFIS model operated as an objective function for optimization process. For this purpose, GA was incorporated into the ANFIS model to acquire the optimal pressure path in order to obtain minimum thinning in the critical region of the part. The results showed that the combination of adaptive neuro fuzzy inference approach and optimization algorithm is a good scheme to predict an improved loading pressure path minimizing the thinning in the critical region of the part and avoiding numerous trial and error simulations or experiments.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Lang LH, Wang ZR, Kang DC, Yuan SJ, Zhang SH, Danckert J et al (2004) Hydroforming highlights: sheet hydroforming and tube hydroforming. J Mater Process Technol 151:165–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Önder E, Tekkaya AE (2008) Numerical simulation of various cross sectional workpieces using conventional deep drawing and hydroforming technologies. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 48:532–542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Labergere C, Gelin JC (2012) Numerical simulation of sheet hydroforming taking into account analytical pressure and fluid flow. J Mater Process Technol 212:2020–2030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Yossifon S, Tirosh J (1985) Rupture instability in hydroforming deep-drawing process. Int J Mech Sci 27:559–570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Yossifon S, Tirosh J, Kochavi E (1984) On suppression of plastic buckling in hydroforming processes. Int J Mech Sci 26:389–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Rimkus W, Bauer H, Mihsein M (2000) Design of load-curves for hydroforming applications. J Mater Process Technol 108:97–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Shim H, Yang DY (2005) A simple method to determine pressure curve for sheet hydro-forming and experimental verification. J Mater Process Technol 169:134–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lin F-C, Kwan C-T (2003) Investigation of T-shape tube hydroforming with finite element method. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 21:420–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Manabe K-I, Suetake M, Koyama H, Yang M (2006) Hydroforming process optimization of aluminum alloy tube using intelligent control technique. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 46:1207–1211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Choi H, Koç M, Ni J (2007) Determination of optimal loading profiles in warm hydroforming of lightweight materials. J Mater Process Technol 190:230–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Li S-H, Yang B, Zhang W-G, Lin Z-Q (2008) Loading path prediction for tube hydroforming process using a fuzzy control strategy. Mater Des 29:1110–1116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chamekh A, Salah HBH, Hambli R (2009) Inverse technique identification of material parameters using finite element and neural network computation. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 44:173–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chamekh A, BelHadjSalah H, Hambli R, Gahbiche A (2006) Inverse identification using the bulge test and artificial neural networks. J Mater Process Technol 177:307–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Abedrabbo N, Worswick M, Mayer R, van Riemsdijk I (2009) Optimization methods for the tube hydroforming process applied to advanced high-strength steels with experimental verification. J Mater Process Technol 209:110–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mirzaali M, Liaghat GH, Naeini HM, Seyedkashi SMH, Shojaee K (2011) Optimization of tube hydroforming process using simulated annealing algorithm. Procedia Eng 10:3012–3019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mirzaali M, Seyedkashi SMH, Liaghat GH, Moslemi H, Naeini K, Shojaee G, Moon YH (2012) Application of simulated annealing method to pressure and force loading optimization in tube hydroforming process. Int J Mech Sci 55:78–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Yaghoobi A, Baseri H, Bakhshi-Jooybari M, Gorji A (2013) Pressure path optimization of hydrodynamic deep drawing of cylindrical-conical parts. Int J Precis Eng Manuf 14:2095–2100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gorji A, Alavi-Hashemi H, Bakhshi-Jooybari M, Nourouzi S (2011) Investigation of hydrodynamic deep drawing for conical-cylindrical cups. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 56:915–927

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ferreira SLC, Bruns RE, Ferreira HS, Matos GD, David JM, Brandão GC et al (2007) Box-Behnken design: an alternative for the optimization of analytical methods. Anal Chim Acta 597:179–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bezdek JC (1981) Pattern recognition with fuzzy objective function algorithms: Kluwer Academic Publishers

  21. Jang J-S (1993) ANFIS: adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference system. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 23:665–685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Abraham A (2005) Adaptation of fuzzy inference system using neural learning. Fuzzy Syst Eng 83:53–83

    Google Scholar 

  23. Mitchell M (1998) An introduction to genetic algorithms: MIT press

  24. Whitley D (1994) A genetic algorithm tutorial. Stat Comput 4:65–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Bakhshi-Jooybari.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yaghoobi, A., Bakhshi-Jooybari, M., Gorji, A. et al. Application of adaptive neuro fuzzy inference system and genetic algorithm for pressure path optimization in sheet hydroforming process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 86, 2667–2677 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-8349-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-8349-2

Keywords

  • Hydroforming
  • Optimization
  • Pressure path
  • ANFIS
  • Genetic algorithm