Skip to main content
Log in

Stiffness modeling of machine tools based on machining space analysis

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Machining stiffness, which serves the overall stability of a machine tool, plays a significant role in determining the resulting machining errors in a machine tool. Therefore, the machine tools can thus be improved to get high levels of precisions directly from what we behold as the most important determinant, the overall stiffness. In this paper, a novel approach modeling the static stiffness field of the machining space is being discussed. Within this method, a parametric model, considering six-directional static stiffness, is established to design and evaluate the static stiffness model of a high-performance computerized numerical control (CNC) machine tool. The result is then used for further discussions on the estimating and reducing of the machining errors. The machining errors are predicted by using the same CNC model under various load bearings considering the practical machining positions and stress conditions. Moreover, the effect of the six-directional static stiffness on the machining errors according to each position in the machining space is researched, where we investigate the possible solutions to reduce the machining errors with the processing technology put into consideration. In the end, by experimenting on boring-milling machining center, we verify the accuracy and efficiency of the proposed error prediction method by comparing the results from experimental data and those from finite element analysis. The proposed model is then proved to have great efficiency in optimizing the machine tool’s layout and structural design based. This improved modeling strongly suggests a favorable application for future manufacturing processes of machine tools.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rivin EI (1999) Stiffness and damping in mechanical design. Dekker, NY

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Schellekens P, Rosielle N, Vermeulen H (1998) Design for precision: current status and trends. Ann Int Inst Prod Eng Res 47(2):557–586

    Google Scholar 

  3. Huang DT, Lee JJ (2001) On obtaining machine tool stiffness by CAE techniques. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 41(8):1149–1163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Olvera D, López LN, Compeán FI, Valdivielso AF, Lamikiz A, Campa FJ (2012) Analysis of the tool tip radial stiffness of turn-milling centers. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 60:883–891

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bustillo A, Plaza LM, Rodriguez M (2011) New strategy for the optimal design and manufacture of high performance milling heads. Rev Metal 6:462–476

    Google Scholar 

  6. Moez S, Zoubeir B, Ali Z, Gilles D, Maher B (2011) Simulation of the deflected cutting tool trajectory in complex surface milling. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 56:463–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Li BT, Hong J, Liu ZF (2014) Stiffness design of machine tool structures by a biologically inspired topology optimization method. Int J Mach Tool Manuf 84:33–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Xu JH, Zhang SY, Tan JR, Liu XJ (2012) Non-redundant tool trajectory generation for surface finish machining based on geodesic curvature matching. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 62(9):1169–1178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cheng Q, Zhao HW, Zhang GJ, Gu PH, Cai LG (2014) An analytical approach for crucial geometric errors identification of multi-axis machine tool based on global sensitivity analysis. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 75:107–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Yan SN, Li BT, Hong J (2015) Bionic design and verification of high-precision machine tool structures. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. doi:10.1007/s00170-015-7155-6

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lu YY, Wang LP, Guan LW (2008) Stiffness analysis and optimization of a hybrid machine tool based on the stiffness matrix. J Tsinghua Univ 48:180–183

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ertürka A, Özgüvena HN, Budakb E (2006) Analytical modeling of spindle-tool dynamics on machine tools using Timoshenko beam model and receptance coupling for the prediction of tool point FRF. Int J Mach Tool Manuf 46:1901–1912

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sanmiguel RE, Hidalgo MM, Jiménez-González JI, Martín-Alcántara A (2015) Analytical approaches to oscillators with nonlinear springs in parallel and series connections. Mech Mach Theory 93:39–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Aydin G, Rajendra S (2013) Stiffness matrix formulation for double row angular contact ball bearings: analytical development and validation. J Sound Vib 332:5898–5916

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hong J, Talbot D, Kahraman A (2014) A semi-analytical load distribution model for side-fit involute splines. Mech Mach Theory 76:39–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Olmedo A, Santiuste C, Barbero E (2014) An analytical model for the secondary bending prediction in single-lap composite bolted-joints. Compos Struct 111:354–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Budak E (2006) Analytical models for high performance milling. Part I: cutting forces structural deflections and tolerance integrity. Int J Mach Tool Manuf 46:1478–1488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wang YY, Huang T, Zhao XM, Mei JP, Chetwynd DG (2008) A semi-analytical approach for stiffness modeling of PKM by considering compliance of machine frame with complex geometry. Chin Sci Bull 53:2565–2574

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bonnemains T, Chanal H, Bouzgarrou BC, Pascal R (2009) Stiffness computation and identification of parallel kinematic machine tools. J Manuf Sci Eng Trans ASME 4131:289–305

    Google Scholar 

  20. Salgado MA, López LN, Lamikiz A, Muñoa J, Sánchez JA (2005) Evaluation of the stiffness chain on the deflection of end-mills under cutting forces. Int J Mach Tool Manuf 45:727–739

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. López LN, Lamikiz A (2009) Machine tools for high performance machining. Springer, London, pp 46–52

    Book  Google Scholar 

  22. Vladimir TP (2011) Stiffness evaluation of machines and robots: minimum collinear stiffness value approach. J Mech Robot 3:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  23. Gosselin C (1990) Stiffness mapping for parallel manipulators. IEEE Trans Robot Autom 6:377–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Chanal H, Duc E, Ray P (2006) A study of the impact of machine tool structure on machining processes. Int J Mach Tool Manu 46:98–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Cardi AA, Firpi HA, Bement MT, Liang SY (2008) Workpiece dynamic analysis and prediction during chatter of turning process. Mech Syst Signal Process 22:1481–1494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Cheng Q, Zhao H, Zhao Y, Sun B, Gu P (2015) Machining accuracy reliability analysis of multi-axis machine tool based on Monte Carlo simulation. J Intell Manuf. doi:10.1007/s10845-015-1101-1

    Google Scholar 

  27. Uriarte L, Herrero A, Zatarain M, Santiso G, Lopéz LN, Lamikiz A, Albizuri J (2007) Error budget and stiffness chain assessment in a micromilling machine equipped with tools less than 0.3mm in diameter. Precis Eng 31:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Agapiou JS (2008) Estimating the static stiffness for a spindle-toolholder-tooling system. Mach Sci Technol 12:77–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Pashkevich A, Chabla D, Wenger P (2009) Stiffness analysis of over constrained parallel manipulators. Mech Mach Theory 44:966–982

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Wu J, Wang JS, Wang LP, Li TM, You Z (2009) Study on the stiffness of a 5-DOF hybrid machine tool with actuation redundancy. Mech Mach Theory 44:289–305

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Liu HT, Zhao WH (2010) Dynamic characteristic analysis for machine tools based on concept of generalized manufacturing space. Chin J Mech Eng 46:54–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Rosen A, Gur O (2009) A transfer matrix model of large deformations of curved rods. Comput Struct 87:467–484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Rui XT, Zhang JS, Zhou QB (2014) Automatic deduction theorem of overall transfer equation of multibody system. Adv Mech Eng 42:4–16

    Google Scholar 

  34. Yan R, Peng FY, Li B (2008) A method of general stiffness modeling for multi-axis machine tool. Intell Robot Appl 53:1013–1021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Guyan RJ (1965) Reduction of stiffness and mass matrices. AIAA J 02:380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Yu J, Imbimbo M, Bettiet R (2010) Stiffness matrix properties for reduced order models of linear structural systems. J Appl Mech 77:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  37. Zhang XL (2002) Dynamic characteristics and application of mechanical surface. Chinese science and technology press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  38. Schneeberger (2011) Monorail and AMS Profiled linear guideways and integrated measuring systems. Schneeberger Co. Ltd, Shanghai, p 35–47

  39. Grossi N, Sallese L, Scippa A, Campatelli G (2015) Speed-varying cutting force coefficient identification in milling. Precis Eng 42:321–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Baotong Li.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gao, X., Li, B., Hong, J. et al. Stiffness modeling of machine tools based on machining space analysis. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 86, 2093–2106 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-8336-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-8336-z

Keywords

Navigation