Skip to main content
Log in

Throughput maximization and buffer design of robotized flexible production systems with feeder renewals and priority rules

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Automation is a powerful way to reduce production costs. The growing market demand for a wide set of models and small batch production make flexible automated production systems an emerging need in several industries. The aim of this paper is to analyze and to maximize the performance of robotized flexible production systems consisting of a robot, feeder, working station, and unloading station, where the operations of the working cycle are scheduled using a sequencing algorithm based on priority rules. Since the working cycle is not predefined, the cycle time is strongly influenced by the parameters characterizing the workcell such as the workcell layout, the robot transfer movements, the feeder, the working operations, and the presence of a buffer between stations. In this work, we modeled the working cycle of a simple but representative layout of an industrial robotized flexible production system with and without buffer, and we implemented a recursive algorithm to estimate the cycle time. The analytical model derived was compared to the experimental results, obtained by using a prototype of the flexible production workcell. The results show that the analytical model is a powerful tool to estimate the performance of the workcell and to identify the design variables or their combinations that maximize the throughput.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wolfson W, Gordon SJ (1997) Designing a parts feeding system for maximum flexibility. Assem Autom 17(2):116–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Reinhart G, Loy M (2010) Design of a modular feeder for optimal operating performance. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol 3:191–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Heilala J, Montonen J, Vaatainen O (2008) Life cycle and unit-cost analysis for modular reconfigurable flexible light assembly systems. J Eng Manuf 222(10):1289–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Manzini R, Gamberi M, Regattieri A, Persona A (2004) Framework for designing a flexible cellular assembly system. Int J Protein Res 42(17):3505–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Battini D, Faccio M, Ferrari E, Persona A, Sgarbossa F (2007) Design configuration for a mixedmodel assembly system in case of low product demand. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 34:188–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Tay ML, Chua PSK, Sim SK, Gao Y (2005) Development of a flexible and programmable parts feeding system. Int J Prod Econ 98:227–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Battini D, Faccio M, Persona A, Regattieri A (2013) Buffer design for availability: a new simulative study in case of infant and random failures. International Journal of Services and Operations Management 14(2):157–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Rosati G, Faccio M, Carli A, Rossi A (2013) Fully flexible assembly systems (F-FAS): a new concept in flexible automation. Assem Autom 33(1):8–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Rosati G, Faccio M, Finetto C, Carli A (2013) Modelling and optimization of fully flexible assembly systems (F-FAS). Assem Autom 33(2):165–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Finetto C, Rosati G, Faccio M, Rossi A (2015) Implementation framework for a fully flexible assembly system (F-FAS). Assem Autom 35(1):114–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Finetto C, Faccio M, Rosati G, Rossi A (2014) Mixed-model sequencing optimization for an automated single-station fully flexible assembly system (F-FAS). Int J Adv Manuf Technol 70(5–8):797–812

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fradrich T, Pachow-Frauenhofer J, Torsten F, Nyhuis P (2011) Aerodynamic feeding systems: an example for changeable technology. Assem Autom 31(1):47–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhou B, Yu J, Shao J, Trentesaux D (2015) Bottleneck-based opportunistic maintenance model for series production systems. J Qual Maint Eng 21(1):70–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kose SY, Kilincci O (2015) Hybrid approach for buffer allocation in open serial production lines. Comput Oper Res 60:67– 78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Vidalis MI, Papadopoulos CT, Heavey C (2005) On the workload and phase load allocation problems of short reliable production line with finite buffers. Comput Ind Eng 48(4):825837

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Aksoy HK, Gupta SM (2005) Buffer allocation plan for remanufacturing cell. Comput Ind Eng 48(3):657677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Benedetti M, Cesarotti V, Giuiusa A, Introna V (2014) Buffer size design in pharmaceutical packaging lines: an analytical methodology proposal and case study. Source of the Document International Journal of Engineering Business Management 6(1):1–10

    Google Scholar 

  18. Senanayake CD, Subramaniam V (2013) Analysis of a two-stage, flexible production system with unreliable machines, finite buffers and non-negligible setups. Flex Serv Manuf J 25(3):414–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zequeira RI, Valdes JE, Berenguer C (2008) Optimal buffer inventory and opportunistic preventive maintenance under random production capacity availability. Int J Prod Econ 111(2):686696

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Buzacott JA (1967) Automatic transfer lines with buffer stocks. Int J Prod Res 5(3):183200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Diamantidis AC, Papadopoulos CT, Heavey C (2007) Approximate analysis of serial flow lines with multiple parallel machine stations. IIE Trans 39(4):361375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Azzi A, Battini D, Faccio M, Persona A (2012) Sequencing procedure for balancing the workloads variations in case of mixed model assembly system with multiple secondary feeder lines. Int J Prod Res 50(21):60816098

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Battini D, Faccio M, Persona A, Sgarbossa F (2009) Balancings equencing for a mixed model assembly system in case of finite buffer capacity. J Adv Manuf Technol 44(34):345359

    Google Scholar 

  24. Edmondson NF, Redford AH (2002) Generic flexible assembly system design. Assem Autom 22(2):139–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Siciliano B, Sciavicco L, Villani L, Oriolo G (2009) Robotics modelling, planning and control. Springer, London, pp 161– 189

    Google Scholar 

  26. Drobouchevitch IG, Geismar HN, Sriskandarajah C (2010) Throughput optimization in robotic cells with input and output machine buffers: a comparative study of two key models. Eur J Oper Res 206:622–633

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Dawande M, Geismar H, Sethi S, Sriskandarajah C (2005) Sequencing and scheduling in robotic cells: recent developments. J Sched 8:387–426

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Abd K, Abhary K, Marian R (2001) A scheduling framework for robotic flexible assembly cells. International Journal of Applied Science and Technology 4(1):31–38

    Google Scholar 

  29. Abd K, Abharya K, Mariana R (2012) Efficient scheduling rule for robotic flexible assembly cells based on fuzzy approach. In: Proceedings of the 45th CIRP conference on manufacturing systems, pp 483–488

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maurizio Faccio.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rosati, G., Oscari, F., Barbazza, L. et al. Throughput maximization and buffer design of robotized flexible production systems with feeder renewals and priority rules. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 85, 891–907 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7995-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7995-0

Keywords

Navigation